SilentSierra

Up! No answer yet. The F-5E is finished, but the manual don't.

Silent Brazil Viggen

I never purchased this kind of product second hand, there's no warranty and still expensive. Don't worry, I found one model of GTX 1070 for a "good" price, comparing others online stores. I can pay for it, but it will be the most expensive piece of hardware of my life. I think there's a lot of people mining cryptocurrencies and the prices increased for everybody.

I know some people in USA, but Brazil has huge budget deficit, they are taxing everything they could, including sendings as gifts. The flight simulators are very expensive hobby and thats it's my problem, I know. I'm a frustrated pilot like most people here and I had no problem to put some money to entertain myself with these stuffs. The ED did a great job creating this level of simulation in DCS 2.5 and I want to run this beauty like the screenshots.

The GTX 1070 looks great, but in Brazil, it's equivalent to pay US$2000,00 for it. My money don't worth anything. The brazilian currency is devaluated against dollar. Brazil is a burocratic, regulation and taxation madness. Tax over tax. Beyond the currency conversion, I pay one VGA for me, one for the government and the reseller profit. Thats why it's a third world country. I can pay for it, but it's a small fortune thats will be obsolete after 5 years, like the GTX 770. I'll think about it.

I'm already looking for a new VGA. The GTX 1070 8GB is too expensive for me, but I can pay for the GTX 1060 6GB, I found some tests on YT, the GTX 1060 6GB looks to be nearly equivalent to GTX 980 4GB. The new Caucasus can be heavier than Nevada and Normandy, I'll wait for DCS 2.5 to see what is the best choice.

Did you had good FPS rates with this VGA with medium/high settings over Las Vegas and Normandy? In Brazil, this VGA costs almost a month of my salary. I need the best choice for the next years in cost/benefit matters. PS: I know it's my problem, I get it, whatever.

Thanks for the advice. I need to check, but probably the new VGA generation will have bottleneck with my CPU generation. Best regards.

I'm sorry, I didn't noticed they released the requirements of 2.5 in the Facebook page. My PC meets the 2.x requirements in download section, my mistake.

Yeah, I know. I said I did what could for now to reach what is recommended in download section. I hope to have enough to run the DCS 2.5 with +30 FPS with some quality. I'm asking what to expect, I'm not saying what developer should or not do.

My PC meets the recommended requirements, it's running with high settings, anti-aliasing 8x, anisotropic filtering 16x and resolution 1080p. In DCS 1.5, I have between 30~60 FPS, but in DCS 2.1 I don't reach good FPS rates. When I'm in Nellis, flying low over Las Vegas or Normandy, I have between 20~30 FPS. If I decrease the anti-aliasing to 2x, I can reach >30 with "ugly edges". I would like to know what to expect about the performance of DCS 2.5? PS 1: I know it's alpha version and early access, I'm only asking a question. PS 2: I'm waiting the release of DCS 2.5 to figure out what I need to fix. Best regards.

I have this issue during a MiG-21bis flight. The other modules are drawing ok. I tried these options below, but it still showing big font size.

Purchased, thanks!

I'm looking some plane or campaign for this autumn sale. I have almost everyone, except some WWII and trainer planes. For me, each one is very expensive (dollar + taxes), but the AJS looks promising (cost / benefit).

Hi there, I would like to suggest some improvements in the kneeboard of the DCS. window: draggable and resizeble. map: draggable (move up/down/left/right) and scrollable (zoom in/out). chapter tabs: clickable tabs to select (briefing, charts, checklists, etc.). generic briefing: briefing pages with editable notes like WDP. interactive checklists: each plane embed interactive checklist with clickable checkboxes like Xchecklist plugin. PS 1: The Kneeboard Builder developer did a good job. PS 2: If the interactive checklist software or file available for customization, community members could develop for free. PS 3: Generic briefing generated by WDP: Best regards.

Hi there, I noticed the Ka-50 cockpit textures are too bright in DCS 2.1. The cables and other stuffs behind the seat looks flat. Is there any plans to do some improviments in the 3D model and texture for new DCS engine? PS: The BS was the first DCS module and new customers will notice the this little details. The new modules are in the state of art. Best regards.

Hi there, I'm interested in purchase this aircraft, but it's still WIP. I would like to know the current status of the project? Is it stable enough to purchase? Are there many missing features? Best regards.

Looks great. If ED had no resources to do the job, could contract or support this guy.

Looks great. I'll test it when I come home. Official threads: https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=180469 https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=180374 Download: https://virpil.com/…/58-vpc-airfield-equipment-dlya-dcs-wor… Site: http://kregred.smile-pilots.ru/index.php/en/

I suggested this sometime ago. Ground services https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=185912

I know the LotAtc, but it's an external tool that could be embedded to the game. The price in brazilian currency it's something like US$ 80. The DCS SRS is an other good external tool thats could be embed. I expect the DCS have these features in plans. They already spending time and money developing the next generation of combat flight simulator, these features will be nice to have in hands.

I would like to suggest some improvements in the F10 map view, probably, the ED already have these in plans. Add an option to show the flight plan when select an aerial unit. Add an option to change to units shown: metric or imperial. Fix the coordinates to show the longitude, is showing only the latitude for me. Show the MGRS and the bullseye coordinate of any unit (ground, sea or air) of the current commander side. Fix the repeated player name when enabled the label option, could be shown the callsign instead. In this label, could add the altitude, speed, bearing, coordinate (latitude/longitude, MGRS and bullseye) instead of the board in the bottom left corner. Add, if possible, some drawing tools like ARMA3 for briefing. Best regards.

I'm sorry if you live in USA and have a potato PC, but I expect the same standards of ED and Belsimtek modules. The price of a single module is the same of a new AAA game.

Your post shows only performence differences, but the aircrafts are different by different developers running over a WIP plataform, it's a lot of variables. I think these performance differences related by you, there's nothing to do with 3D modeling or texture, it's more about how the aircraft systems and the flight model was coded. You could have the FPS increased/decreased by a lot of factors: hardware, software, game settings, scenaries, objects, scripts, etc. The developers can add more routines iterating to simulate sensors, gauges, aircraft behaviors, etc. All these stuffs can be tunned by developers. The DCS still a WIP, each new release, everything can change for better or not.

I didn't notice already have a thread about it. The switch covers looks flat, the clock, etc., these details could be improved. I don't know if is needed redo the a entire cockpit because of this. I hope they fix it in the future.