rbz

Thank you @Panzerlang, so it sounds like I am not pulling enough g's to overheat. I usually only fly for about 45 minutes at a time. I do have Aggressive Control Mode selected. MOZA "claims" to cut off at 40C but I haven't tested it or ever noticed it cutting off. It may have and I didn't notice. 9 newton meters is enough to tire my forearm in prolonged guns only dogfights (P-51 &F-4E). But if the force isn't realistic I would have no way of knowing. nullI really wish there was a way we could all just go to a store to test the FFB options and just buy the best one. Maybe MOZA is fine, maybe it isn't. My best comparison is CMDT videos for FF Beast on YouTube. Compared to that proper modules appear to be about the same but Flaming Cliffs and OH-6 are not working so well for me as FFBeast is for CMDT. I suspect, as many people have said that the software is the difference. I thought that meant the Telemetry FFB wasn't possible. But I believe it is that there is no community creating profiles for the MOZA stick to bring FFB to anything but the most popular modules MOZA set up themselves.

I have been using this MOZA AB9 base for about a month now and I like it a lot. My impression is that it is great but I wish more aircraft profiles were available. That is not what I am seeing in the comments. I believe this is because I have never used a force feedback joystick before and am just blown away by getting the feedback (trim, shaking before stalls, etc.). What features am I missing out on that competitors have and MOZA doesn't?

Someone should submit a PR to update this for everyone

Has anyone created any presets for aircraft yet? I feel like this is missing. But only a handful of aircraft are modeled. The F-4E with it's trim system is transformational. The aircraft and the feedback are in perfect sync. If we had some sharing program where pilots of the actual aircraft could Set profiles for OH-58D or P-47D or AH-64D, for example this is the missing piece of the puzzle IMO null

@currenthill, your work is amazing. I can see recently ED has been trying to compete with you on M1A2 and other assets. I am shocked to see the complete lack of quadcopter drones in DCS since they have played such a major role in recent history {Azerbaijan Armenia conflict}, {Ukraine} and {in the middle east} just to name a few. If there were 2 simple drones [recon/direction drone] and kamikaze drone that a player could "Drive" from my non-technical perspective could set up some interesting scenarios.

CGTC is ground texture-specific, aiming for a modern, crisp look with good performance with a focus on the terrain details. Where BARTHEK’s mod is a nearly comprehensive working to fix the entire environment (trees, lighting, water, etc.). CGTC often emphasizes performance improvements with quality textures. BARTHEK’s seems to focus on visual immersion vs. resource usage (this is a guess. I don't know either developer) I am trying to understand @dlder's comments. I know basically nothing in this area and am still amazed by reshade and even just adjusting my Gamma LOL.

@Barthek Is it even possible to beat the following: 1. Install BARTHEK's CAUCASUS REDONE 2022 - REV 2 (by BARTHEK) 2. Install Caucasus CGTC 2.84.1 2023 Edition (by - Luke Marqs) over top of it 3. Install Caucasus_Better_Trees_v6_Dark_Low (by Taz1004) 4. Optionally Install Snowless Caucasus by BARTHEK Default Syria looks amazing is many areas and I have noticed the Massun92's work is being used to upgrade assets across many maps. It looks like real potential is in cities (to replace the Falcon 4.0 quality images with something resembling city streets and houses that are passible without exceeding a basic poly-count. What do you think of this? I am seeing Syria and Sinai as being distantly out in front in terms of quality, Kola is rarely as good as the output of the stacking of your work with "Luke Marqs"'s even after the last update. It would be interesting to know why this is not an acceptable path forward in general, licensing maybe? I know nothing of graphic design. Just layman observations.

Are recent screenshots like [Schlingel mit Kringel] still referring to "Barthek's CAUCASUS REDONE 2022 REV. 2"? https://drive.google.com/file/d/11UQYxK91vFOnwtwxQ-adAw2zH5-vIMDg/view https://drive.google.com/file/d/10oB6YeqAoKhfGTmbtyG0IA7sdGGZa4UQ/view or is there an updated version?