HanuXXL

Oooh! I was already giving up on this module as FM felt so off! Not any more!

Yes, those names mentioned seem to be correct ones, thanks. Also I just found one missing line in ufcPatch.lua that had to be defined. Now it works in F-14 with dedicated lua definitions. This thing really helps to ulilize F-18 UFC better!

Great work guys! Just noticed this, and started to customize it, as I don't much care about info's that are easilly read from the cockpit... HOWEVER F-14 and IAS is a different thing... I managed to get what I want (IAS on scratchpad and flight mode buttons) via modifying ufcPatchGeneral.lua, but I'd like to have dedicated settings for F-14... I'm not much a coder, but a copy/paste-engineer, so I made a guess and added these F-14 lines in ufcPatch.lua between A-10 and Apache: ... -- A-10C sends throttled data every 0.2 seconds elseif moduleName == "A-10C" then if ufcExportClock.canTransmitLatestPayload then return ufcPatchA10C2.generateUFCData() end -- F-14A sends throttled data every 0.2 seconds elseif moduleName == "F-14A" then if ufcExportClock.canTransmitLatestPayload then return ufcPatchF14.generateUFCData() end -- F-14B sends throttled data every 0.2 seconds elseif moduleName == "F-14B" then if ufcExportClock.canTransmitLatestPayload then return ufcPatchF14.generateUFCData() end -- AH-64D_BLK_II sends information when latest is available ... And my ufcPatchF14.lua looks like this local ufcUtils = require("ufcPatch\\utilities\\ufcPatchUtils") ufcPatchF14 = {} -- Shows static data on the UFC function ufcPatchF14.generateUFCData() local MainPanel = GetDevice(0) -- local FC3RadarAltitudeString = ufcPatchUtils.GenaricRadarAltitudeFeet() -- local HeadingString = ufcPatchUtils.MagHeading() local AirspeedString = ufcPatchUtils.AirspeedKnots() -- local FuelString = ufcPatchUtils.TotalFuel() -- local Vertical = ufcPatchUtils.VerticalV_FPM() -- local FlareCount = ufcPatchUtils.flares() -- local ChaffCount = ufcPatchUtils.chaff() --Send info to UFC components log.write("WWT", log.INFO, "Trying to load custom example") return ufcUtils.buildSimAppProUFCPayload({ option1="T.O.", option2="CRUI", option3="A/A", option4="A/G", option5="LNDG", scratchPadNumbers="AirspeedString", scratchPadString1="O", scratchPadString2="N", com1="X", com2="8", selectedWindows={"1", "2", "3", "4", "5"} }) end return ufcPatchF14 Tried also using "F-14AB" as moduleName as some programs see it, but had no success... I guess the problem is that I have wrong modulename? Or something else? dcs.log looks promising however? 2025-05-02 15:09:48.190 INFO WWT (Main): Winwing export installed! 2025-05-02 15:09:48.191 INFO WWT (Main): Export start! 2025-05-02 15:09:57.546 INFO WWT (Main): F-14B 2025-05-02 15:09:57.546 INFO WWT (Main): UFC Patch Mod Enabled: Setting up now 2025-05-02 15:09:57.546 INFO WWT (Main): Detected module F-14B, UFC Patch Mod Enabled 2025-05-02 15:09:57.546 INFO WWT (Main): Running use custom ufc now But sadly the screens stay black

Explaining a joke is not mandatory

I also wish that the basket would not autodisconnect within seconds if I somehow manage to catch it.

Also check that you have excluded DCS folders from Microsoft Defender. That is one pain in the butt...on and causes random stutters.

Thanks, I guess I'll try the Hormuz. And yes; dedicated server is how I like to run the missions. Got to check that Apache campaign too; thanks for the heads up!

Hi, been enjoying most excellent Baltic_dragons campaings and planned to get in action with a buddy, but what 2-player campaigns could you recommend? Operation Hormuz looks really nice, but the author tells in description already that you need normally at least 4 human players for completion. "Oil in the water" and "Operation Mountain Lion" seem to fill my player requirements. Can anyone tell these still work after all the DCS updates? Anything else you could recommend? Also I've not hosted scripted campaigns yet, so do you have to host these on local server or can you run campaigns in dedicated server also?

Great! Never give up this radio procedure! It brings so much immersion to the missions. It it was one of the main things that guided me to use correct procedures overall.

Thank you! I really appreciate that you've done this without mods. And with multiple versions. Looks really nice; I'll definitely use these in my missions!

I agree here, Mission 2 was great! I had 500kg of fuel left when I landed (I wasted some during... the work); brought some excitement for my part also

That's no moon... It's a space station!

Not pushing or anything, but just a reminder as you felt interested about this idea of developing civAir module. Your participation here takes a heck of a lot of your free time, I can only guess, and I appreciate every bit you do here even without this modification. This feature would be so great for example in Kola map.

BD posted a link couple of messages above; there was an e-mail address https://www.baltic-dragon.net/win-a-hotas

Sure you may post my review, if it's any help for you Just send my proof of purchase.

Great campaign!! Just finished it and I'm still grinning like an idiot! The last mission was the hardest one and thus so satisfying M04 almost beat me to it too, but I managed finally. I guess that was the only time when MAVF hit the correct target (damn I hate those IR-Mavs, which pick whom they like as their target, especially from convoys, mixed group of units: ie. häröpallo's.) So many things I learned/realized while playing this, that I don't even dare to list them, but I owe you a debt of gratitude when putting me into learning path! Excellent voice actors, great story. Difficulty and dedication to actual procedures was just spot on for me. Highly recommended!

M04 has been so far the hardest mission for me. I had really really hard time spotting it against all snow etc, but finally on the fifth take I managed to bag that mission. Really great campaign so far; only two missions left. I however need a lot of more practice with F-16 to start that part of the "same" campaign, but that is the intention. I thought I was quite adept with F-18 before I tried this one, but no... It has been one great learning experience. Surely I'm not ready for the same level of campaign with Viper yet!

Hmm, guess you are right Phantom, I must have fumbled with elevation, probably mixed up the meters/feets.

Can you get the CCIP mode as active any more in F-18 in the latest patch? In DDI you can see CCIP being selected, but in HUD it reads as AUTO and works like auto. Thanks, rob10. You were correct. ----- Also AUTO misses the target by dropping Mk20's long. Mk82's hit where the should hit in AUTO. CCIP-always-auto.trk

S! Just some small errors I noted during briefing: Briefing page 4, "Boomerang" has had too little coffee as he speaks Devil 1 and "Slick" from the last mission, as he should be talking about Devil 2 and "Bigi". As in page 5 onward he does. On Kneeboard page 3/5, ROCK WP is written 99, as it actually is 59 (The latest, yes) Minor stuff, sure. But just you to know. Having a great time so far.

But you DO get it to work? In Arctic Thunder I was pulling my hair as I could not enter the bearing, and finally noticed the same as topic opener. I decided to train a bit and created a mission with some targets around a WP and used ruler in ME to bearing and range... But when I try to Weapon Designate FLIR to those O/S points, they are way off (sic). Seems like it designates several degrees below the intended area.

Thanks for the great campaign! Feeling great so far! But could I also hope that the kneeboards could have a bit better resolution? They are quite blurry. For example in F-16 Arctic Thunder those are more readable.

Thank you for the Yeller model explanation. I've had hard time grasping this, but I think that even a blockhead like me understood this.

Great job again, thanks! By the way, if time permits and you get inspiration... Especially when using CAM on civAir, it would be much more immersive if you could set altitude per plane. I mean if you could somehow separate the behaviour of the planes. The best example is naturally Cessna; when they are cruising on 10km like intercontinental planes it feels quite awkward. And usually they should only fly short bush trips, compared to Boeing 747 which have very different flight profile. Different type of trigger perhaps, civAir_domestic with cruise altitude value, which would not be connected in route-finding algorithm to general civAir triggerzones, but would connect only those domestic/local triggers. Just a suggestion. I hope you understood what I was trying to describe. Thank you for doing this and adding CAM overall here; for historical reasons been using MOOSE RAT traffic, but as we are aware it keeps degrading and thus I've been using DML in my latest missions.

Just came here to say if someone has problems that the displays are not showing anything, but can be seen in device manager, the very likely problem is that you could have too old Displaylink drivers. Mine were from 2019 IIRC in my gaming rig where windows installation is originally quite old. They were not updated for example when I went from Win 10 -> Win 11. https://www.synaptics.com/products/displaylink-graphics/downloads/windows Windows could not find any update for these, but as I troubleshooted I noticed that displays were working on my gaming laptop and it had newer drivers. So I downloaded those and after driver update the displays started working fine.