Supernova-III

no redundancy at all. I fly only Su-25, and completely ignore Su-25T, they are so different. The only similar thing is the airframe and flight models are close. But even in this respect, non-T version is more agile.

... you know

I'm too smart for this

it's entirely possible to implement pretty precise mouse control. There are some good examples of this.

got it. So it feels better for you knowing that there's just 5% deviation from the docs?

why? I'm pretty sure I'm not alone This is mostly true. But 5% Compared to what? To reality? Don't you mix accuracy of solving differential equations and "closeness to reality"? How to even express that closeness to reality? How do you convince yourself that it's closer to/further from reality with one or another update? I believe, if you as a player haven't witnessed the real thing, you have no ability to recognize that something is close to real. Doesn't matter how complex your equations are and how accurate they solved. It should make the model closer to reality, but most people cannot recognize this. I'm really interested, what you'd answer to this. @draconus I know, for example, that real Su-25 has a "narrow gauge" which makes taxiing a bit trickier, but it also makes takeoff and run after landing very dangerous (especially with crosswind). In DCS I can say the same thing about Su-25, but does it mean that it's close to reality? IMO, no. It's entirely possible that real rook is dangerous in different way in reality, compared to DCS.

DCS is still a simulator. It's still a waaaaaaaaaaaaaay better than WT (the DCS recently started being compared to). It models the systems. In realistic way or not. ED will strive to implement this as realistic as possible if there's info. In every other way, it may help ED to earn more money and finally release my favorite Su-25. Maybe

Anyway guys, how do you know if we actually have accurate simulation of existing planes? How much of us flown F-14/15/16/18? Or maybe Sukhoi's planes? So ask yourself, what do you really mean by saying "I wanna have realistic model". Most of us will never have possibility to verify that the plane flies the way it does in reality. Same to aircraft systems. Most of us have a very limited knowledge how it should work. I'm not even saying about the right feel in the aircraft which is anyway different even for every single pilot. So maybe we have to stop that madness with ultra-realism? It's fine if there's something well-known about the aircraft and it modeled this way in DCS. But otherwise you won't ever verify this anyway. woops, I said it

makes sense!

Me too, but nowadays F-35 is more realistic to release. Hahahaha, I was surprised so much!

I'd like to have Sh modifications of FAB-250 and FAB-500: ShL and ShN.

sorry, not sure I get it

For WW2 birds, release of F-35 means that they cannot fly safe anymore...

but what stops you from using A-10C as simpler attack aircraft? Just don't use guided weapons and targeting pod. Or maybe it kills the vibe for you?

Why not start over and make F-15E from scratch instead of F-15C? F-15E is not absolute property of RAZBAM I guess?

It would make a lot more sense if they could make Su-27 and make sure that it sells like hot cakes. MiG-29 is a legendary plane, no doubts, but it's not competitive against most 4-th gen fighters in DCS. And overall it's not as capable as Su-27, which can carry a lot more weapons and fuel. From that perspective, making MiG-29 doesn't make any sense to me. ED decided to make one of the weakest redfor 4-th gen plane, I won't be surprised if it won't be as popular as one might expect.

does it really mean a lot of information? Look at Su-30, it's also widely exported.

Could you please elaborate more on that? This guy is from ED I guess. Are you guys on the same page about what is possible and what is not? I'm a bit confused. For me it's rather great news that you're working on F-35. For me it means that you don't need secret data for making an aircraft and it's claimed to be realistic (whatever this mean). Which means that there's actually a lot you can do. For example, Su-25 (it's not classified though), F-18E/D, Su-30/35, and so on.

You can enable turbulence and wind. What is wrong with this?

Я когда летал на пружинном джойстике, МиГ-29 управлялся прям плохо и непонятно. Когда у меня появился FFBeast с **правильной** настройкой под МиГ-29 -- это уже радикально другое дело.

got it, thanks

I confirm, in ctrl+v mode it launches all heavy rockets: S-24, S-25. But still, it doesn't allow me to fire just two or four rockets simultaneously, when I press ctrl+space. Save applies to light rockets

when you set salvo mode to 2, it should fire 2 rockets, when salvo mode is 4, it should fire 4 rockets, and so on. For example 0:26, 0:39 in this video. Generally from videos on this channel, it looks like rocket salvo should work somehow. I'm not sure, how exactly but I think you may know it better.