Irisz

Thank you very much! My memory is on CL 14, that's all I did tuning, nothing else. I'll take it down to default XMP!

We could use much less memory for DCS World if the game was not based on the fact that only HIGH-sized very high-resolution textures must first be read into the memory and VRAM and then converted from there to, for example, a LOW preset, which is three times lower resolution. My average memory usage is 33,000 MB of physical and paging files in total, so that all my texture presets are LOW, because these high textures are read by the SSD and written into the memory. Unfortunately, the developers are lazy and do not optimize DCS World and would create LOW - MEDIUM and HIGH separate texture installation packages, so three types, then DCS World would have many more users. Because here, simply, if you don't buy 32 GB of ram in your computer, it won't start, and if you want good performance, you need 64 GB of ram by default. If, for example, we were to install DCS World with the LOW texture package, we would need three times less SSD storage space and three times less memory, which would open the door to DCS World for the masses because not everyone is rich or an oligarch with a lot of money to pour their money into their computer. Sorry for the wording!

I just wanted to fly my favorite Flanker and DCS World crashed! Here are the log files, I already sent the log files to the ED server when DCS World crashed, but I will send them here too! 49,213 MB of my physical memory was used after 7 minutes of online playing! Low texture setting and the map texture is also set to Low. Thanks! dcs.log-20240915-061413.zip Here is the gameplay and the crash!

It's even more certain, but I'll tell you it will arrive sooner than Deka's never-realizable MFI-55, which he promised people, because an AIM-120D is easier to modify with an engineer from the AIM 120C5, so that almost all the information of the AIM-120D is available. I think this official picture of the state of the J-11A MLU in 2015 would be worth more to the community, which has been wanting for 15 years to finally see some change in the state of Redfor. A PL-10 and a PL-15 missile is easier to make than a Belarusian military secret! Meanwhile, the philosophy of the FC series and the FC2024 is about the fact that these aircraft are not based on complete implementation but on simplicity. I was the only one who pointed out that the Su-30MKK will not be a savior because it uses the same missiles as the J-11A. Maybe the PL-10 would be a bit difficult, but the PL-15 is already in mod form in DCS World. So this way would still be easier. Look at how successful the Growling Sidewinder server is with the J-11A PL-12 option, and there is no rebellion to stop using PL-12 immediately, specifically the most popular server among all servers. With these options, I think that for 10 years no one would ask for things on the forum that no one has been able to respond to this problem for 15-20 years. J-11A 2015 MLU citing what allegedly is an official poster from the PLAAF 16th air brigade. This is an official poster for the 2015 status of the J-11A MLU. I will describe it again if necessary, the Chinese will not publicly report on everything they do, this picture is also 9 years old and was only published in 2024. I don't need to be whipped because I would do something so that DCS World is not called a NATO simulator! I think this is exactly what ED should think about, because the F-15C AIM-120D+AIM9X would bring a huge fan base to DCS World. As well as these 3 missiles that are missing from the J-11A, which could be renamed to the J-11A MLU without violating any military secrets. Of course, I'm not saying that Deka shouldn't make Su-30MKK, but that these things would once and for all solve this problem that Redfor fans have been asking for for decades. The N001 radar is only effective at 50-60 km against targets the size of fighter jets, if the Meteor missile arrives, it will have a no escape zone distance that exceeds everything in BVR air combat. The AIM-120D has a no escape zone of about 40 km. So even if these missiles are mounted on the J-11A, it will not be a savior, but it will be much more enjoyable to play DCS World and NATO aircraft will continue to dominate. If Meteor and AIM-120D arrive, without PL-12 and PL-15 we are just target drones. And even if the answer is to make a mission so that the opponent is not strong, it doesn't work because everyone wants the best and strongest. If you do the balanced mission for the players, they simply won't play because the Flanker and Fulcrum will dominate, and if the NATO aircraft suffers, they will go and play on the Growling Sidewinder server. It's simple psychology, I don't play on servers from the 80s as a Flanker fan either, because the FA-18C and F-16CM fly with datalink with modern radars made after 2000, which someone calls 80s, but it's not. This is the real problem here.

If you watch the video, the missile still has enough speed, but its battery is running out. Elsewhere, it has a battery life of 90 seconds, unfortunately not here!

I have passed several R-27 missile tests, I can launch at an altitude above 17 km, even then it does not fly over a distance of more than 100 km! The R-77, on the other hand, would be capable of 120 km if you let it have a bigger battery!

https://forum.dcs.world/topic/78139-rakety-v-dcs/?do=findComment&comment=5476670

R-27EP maximum 200 km searching capability and 110 km ballistic range, the target does not change direction. Otherwise the R-27ET infrared search head is also effective enough for such missile launches. Especially if ED were to modernize the missile's seeker, about which we already gave him enough information, which would make the R-27ET even more effective than the R-27EP! The Russian and Chinese air forces have moved on to active radar seeker heads and long range air to air missiles. I only ask one thing, you launch the R-27EP into a radar radiation and another fighter enters in its direction to search for a target. What if it turns to a friend? I still say the R-27ET works in about the same passive way, and the range of the no escape zone is the same as the R-27EP. I have various situations where the missile would be useless because the target simply changes direction and there is nothing to follow. 110 km ballistic range is not enough to destroy an AWACS, at this distance there is no incompetent person who allows an AWACS to fly without air defense. R-37M - PL-15 - PL-21 and you don't fly over air defenses. We already talked about it in another topic, unfortunately ED prevents him from helping or allowing Deka to do something with the J-11A. As I mentioned earlier, the Su-30MKK is not better in air to air combat because it uses the same missiles as the J-11A. The Su-30MKK has higher drag, so it is even slower. ED also said that they cannot manufacture weapons after 2015 because they are a complete military secret. Here we go back to the J-11A again, why is it not at MLU level, why is it just an R-77 hack.

Personally, I would easily put these missiles on the J-11A, renaming it to J-11A MLU. The helmet sight system wouldn't be a problem for the PL-10 launching at 90 degrees it would just track closer targets better due to the sensor's wide field of view. Unfortunately, I can’t mention the name of the person responsible for preventing this from happening. Imagine, for this MLU, we would only need two more missiles everything else is ready. After all, the FC series isn't about complete authenticity, so it makes sense that a small investment would enhance the product's appeal. It's interesting that the F-15C gets the AIM-120D and AIM-9X by default! That's all we know, we can only criticize them, which is entirely fair. Hopefully, they'll eventually snap out of their NATO admiration! By the way, as the ED engineers calculated what the R-27ER could do, they had to completely rebuild it. Then by doubling the 160 km range of the PL-12 and doubling the battery life, everything else is almost ready, there is even a PL-15 missile model in the form of a mod, I don't think anyone would be offended if they used the mod, the J-11A was also made from a mod that they made money in the FC series. Around 2017, if you search in the user files, you will find the Su-27+R77 mod, from which it was upgraded to official, that's about the end of the story. I laugh and read about every 3 months that this topic comes up and our person always answers the same thing and here is an opportunity and they don't use it!

I understand that ED is unlikely to allow any changes, and Deka hasn't provided much information since 2018. Initially, it all started as a mod driven by enthusiasm, but due to military secrecy, progress stalled, and it only became a Su-27+R77 mod without further development. Considering we don’t even have detailed images of the J-11A MLU cockpit, it's unrealistic to expect China to release detailed information on any additional modifications made to the J-11A MLU in 2024. (This is just my assumption.) So far, we've only encountered speculative reports about what the J-11A MLU might involve, with no official confirmation. I like to look under the hood. Our current DCS World J-11A N001 radar can serve the PL-12 missile. My DCS World tests are coming! The current N001 radar can track the B52 bomber from 210 km away! Here on the YouTube video you can see how the DCS World PL-12 missile reaches the B52 bomber from 160 km away. The DCS World PL-12 could have a longer range, but the missile's battery life prevents a longer range. You saw the picture above, the DCS World PL-12 has a maximum range of about 180 km! So, even the current radar would be enough against bomber sized targets... The PL-15 missile with a range of 300 km requires a more powerful radar. It is justified here that it needs to be modernized because of the PL-15 missile. These are my thoughts and I don't want to start a debate, I just showed the details!

Interesting picture of our little favorite! J-11A 2015 MLU citing what allegedly is an official poster from the PLAAF 16th air brigade.

The original Su-27S HUD!

По крайней мере четверо моих друзей покинули мир DCS в течение 5 или 6 лет из-за этого. Еще мне просто повезло, потому что я уже давно купил 64Гб памяти, если бы у меня не было столько, меня бы уже давно здесь не было! Думаю, я покину форум, потому что больше не могу смириться с тем, что здесь все можно только хвалить, а реальность совсем другая. До свидания, я терпеть не могу, когда мне сверлят мозг историями, в которые я должен верить! Живите в этом мире, в то время как другие намеренно сохраняют низкие минимальные системные требования, чтобы как можно больше людей могли играть в их игры и тратить свои деньги на разработчиков игр, а не на компьютер!

На этих 700 ГБ поместятся 5 популярных игр! Я хочу это подчеркнуть: чтобы сделать DCS World стабильным, нужно вдвое или вчетверо больше памяти, и это удерживает людей от того, чтобы сделать DCS World популярным, ведь только преданные своему делу люди тратят столько денег на компьютер! Рекомендуется: SSD-накопитель: 95 ГБ свободного места! С такой опцией вы сможете играть с текстурами самого высокого разрешения, а это невообразимо в DCS World! Помимо 6 ГБ или 8 ГБ видеопамяти для текстур максимального разрешения, здесь, в DCS World, это 24 ГБ видеопамяти, подозреваю, что когда выйдет RTX 5090, ожидания будут еще выше! Рекомендуемые системные требования должны быть существенно снижены, чтобы сделать мир DCS привлекательным для большего числа людей!

It doesn't cause a problem because if you don't install the pack, your own skin will be the 1 skin you use, if another user installs a different skin on his plane, he will see it. It is not possible to impose on the user what he does not want, and that the user has the right to manage the storage space of the SSD! Here, we could touch on the topic of how buying a lot of memory and SSD storage holds back the popularity of DCS world. Other games are successful because they can be played on a toaster, DCS World is not. DCS World can be started on a 10-year-old computer, but playing with a LOW texture preset is very difficult for the player. Many cockpit labels cannot be read with the LOW texture preset! I have experience where a YouTuber with 1370 subscribers Youtube Link: Viper Zero helps more beginner players come to DCS World. These users are already faced with the fact that those who do not have 32GB of memory in their computer will suffer in the stable running of DCS World. I was the one who made tons of videos for beginner players to learn the basics and finally had to delete the videos because apart from buying products from the E shop, DCS World has no concept. There is a Growling Sidewinder server where you can play against Red VS Blue with 20-year-old Soviet technology against modern NATO equipment from the 2000s, which I would not go into detail about the swear words used by the users who came here from that other game. Where they can already have fun with modern MiG-29SMT and Su-27SM aircraft. I think it is important that ED makes money, but until you learn how to use the product you have purchased, the concept will not be attractive for their product and simulator. In single player, if a beginner player does not know how to edit missions and does not know how to use his own aircraft, he will not be able to create missions for himself. Unfortunately, my community is very toxic and anyone who is not a NATO fan is a very lonely wolf in my community. Simply having a fun game next to DCS World won't appeal. The fact is that in the other game you can achieve success with the time you invest, here in the DCS world, specifically pour your money into ED all the time and as I mentioned elsewhere, the game is based on multiplayer, and a new player comes over here and is a fan of a Soviet aircraft, then that's rough in other words, it is doomed because the whole DCS World is stuck on the Soviet side around 1990. I will write again that if the player goes somewhere else, it doesn't even cost him money to play and have fun with post-2000 Russian military equipment, here in DCS World he will never get what he wants. They buy the FC product and are forced to use NATO equipment even if they don't want to suffer with outdated Soviet equipment, and this is their problem because they like Soviet military equipment and not NATO equipment. After they buy an FC product, they are forced to buy NATO equipment if they don't want to play the game in extra hard mode. If they come to the forum, they are told that this is what you have to love. The end result is that if they don't get what they want, they uninstall DCS World and get rid of this problem. No one will return their money. With this free to play concept, those players will not develop the high level of indifference and hatred towards DCS World that develops due to this problem. Players who are dedicated fans of Russian and Soviet military technology are unfortunately doomed to suffer because they want to enjoy themselves in the on multiplayer servers, but unfortunately these new players can only be target drones. If you screw up the whole concept in the beginning to get the new player to like the DCS World simulator, it will be very hard to undo the damage. Since with this free to play concept they do not feel that their money has been wasted, this hatred and indifference towards the DCS world will not develop. By the way, these games have millions of dollars in revenue and DCS World does not. I believe that competition makes people innovate, and criticism moves the world forward. It's not good to walk around with your eyes closed and always let someone else decide what's good for you! I wrote about this above, where the Russian Soviet equipment was stuck in 1990 and there is no suitable counterpart for the aircraft. FA-18C - MiG-29K (We don't have MiG-29K AI yet) F-16CM - MiG-29SMT (We don't have MiG-29SMT AI yet) F-15E - Su-27SM or Su-27SM3 or Su-30MK or Su-35UB(We don't even have AI with these Russian aircraft types) F-14B - MiG-31 with a weakened R-33 missile (The range of the R-33S missile is similar to that of the AIM-54 missile, but until it gets close it is just a target drone. No MiG-31B with R-33S missiles. Nobody dares to dream about 31BM) Eurofighter Typhoon - Maybe it will bring a lot of money to the kitchen, but it will become depopulated on the multiplayer RedFor side, there is no 4.5 gen MiG-35 (By then we will no longer be alive when the MiG-35 appears, but it is also possible that there will be no DCS world) The MiG-29A has been here for 15 years in the FC2 and FC3 products, the fact that it will have a clickable cockpit will only be needed by dedicated fans. There are people who buy all ED products, but these are not real buyers, just supporters. It is easy to describe that a product is selling well if many people buy from the ED shop out of habit but do not use the product. I can see this because a lot of people in my community are bored in DCS World. They bought a lot of airplanes and don't know how to occupy themselves, and if a new product appears in the E shop, they will neglect their old airplane and deal with the new airplane. I have already written about the problem of buying an unknown product in the E shop and learning to use the simulator. If you master it, it loses its appeal because you will not be concerned with learning, but with the fact that there is nothing to do in the DCS world. AI is 20 years behind, it has an SFM flight model, if you can't come up with an interesting mission, it's all boring. And then comes the fact that there is a new product in the E shop and you will not be bored if you buy a new product and you can learn how to use it again and if you get to the point where you learn this too, then this new product will also be boring. Then you need a well-timed new product in the E shop and you can start all over again. Anyone who is not in this squirrel wheel is concerned with not being able to do anything in DCS World. After a while, Red vs Blue also becomes boring because you reach the upper limit of your knowledge. DCS World is interesting for NATO fans, boring for RedFor fans for years. The answer is disrespectful to go somewhere else, because for many people it is a pride and joy in their life that they can be here with ED and play DCS World. It is disrespectful to send these people away. The product must be made attractive, this is the common goal, not going in one direction! Or if you don't understand what I wrote " - GFM! F-16 and Mirage 2000-5 fly like a weightless UFO!" then you don't even play with Redfor aircraft in Single Player because these two types of aircraft are mentioned in quite a few forum posts because of the outdated SFM they fly like UFOs. That's why I'm only a multiplayer PVP player so that I don't have to deal with such problems that have been there for years. This is your opinion, but you can see how drones are still dominating in the current conflict, they are cheap and efficient. There is already a General Atomics MQ-9 Reaper drone mod and I think it brings joy to many people. The more military equipment a player can control, the more interesting the DCS World and the more opportunities for ED to earn money!

Good day everyone, here is my wish list! - DCS World Texture pack in which the user can choose whether to install textures in SD or HD resolution to the core of DCS World! (less storage space usage, less memory usage, less VRAM usage, MORE and satisfied users in DCS World) - DCS World's new default SD resolution skin system where every aircraft and ground unit has ONLY ONE skin! If the user chooses to install a full SD or HD skin pack, all skins in DCS World will be available! As long as the user does not install the skin pack, every aircraft and ground unit has only one SD skin with every new update, which does not cause problems even on online servers! - Before installation, the DCS World client should ask the user if he wants to install the terrain in SD or HD resolution! (the HD version should have a higher price, the SD version should have a lower price) - Wider selection of modern Redfor AI aircraft in DCS World! - All user-flyable aircraft use the most modern radar technology! - A more attractive free to play program for new players who can get FC products by simply playing! Collect points in some form and get the user-selectable FC product! - More FC products, the more the better! - Su-37 AI Aircraft or user-playable Su-37 FC product! (also good without TVC engine) - Completely reworked AI Aircraft behavior! - GFM! F-16 and Mirage 2000-5 fly like a weightless UFO! - More modern R-27T, R-27ET and R-73 missiles! Mayak-80M (MK-80M) appears to be a version modified for use on the R-27T/ET, which replaced the earlier 36T seeker at some point, rather than an upgraded seeker for the R-73. 1995-1996 Improved R-73M mentioned. R-73M1 and R-73M2 designations used by Janes (erroneously) for basic and improved R-73, with the latter having increased off-bore capability of +-60 deg. Trials said to have begun in 1994. - DCS World user can buy and fly a drone product with lots of weapons! (ED believe me, it makes a lot of money and you can have fun with it on online servers) - Any type of AI Wingman can be selected by a player (ask for a MiG-31 Wingman or whatever you want) can be activated from the menu in single player and online servers and only one wingman is possible!

If you turn off the page file, it will be transferred to the physical memory, that's the secret! What you can read on the internet that you must use a page file is somewhat outdated, because in the past you needed a page file because you couldn't put 64GB or 128GB of physical memory in your computer! This is also the name of the page file, an extended memory that is on the SSD or the Winchester. It is extended, so if you cancel it, it will not be extended to the drive and it will not use the slower drive. I repeat, you will not experience the difference until you try it. You can see in the pictures that on an online server, 20+ players do not reach the 35 - 40GB usage without a page file. My memory usage is less 28000 MB comitted because the texture preset is Medium and the terrain texture is Low! People often stick to their habits and find it difficult to change them!

You have to enter the password twice to start DCS World, this is a problem and unnecessary. The new Launcher has very good potential and while it is a one-to-one copy of the old in-game menu. It should be expanded with the following functions to make sense of the new Launcher! - Enable/disable track file recording on/off function! - Replay file player with a function that can be started directly from the Launcher! - All CoreMods/Liveries files can be selected drastically reduced size skins and the current TOO LARGE skins SD/HD/UHD (currently this is how the storage space reservation should be SD: 31.5 GB/HD: 63 GB /UHD: 126 GB) optional option to choose which pack the Launcher should install for the DCS World core. (My DCS World client increased by 25 GB in 1.5 months without purchasing anything)

I would like to ask the developers if it is possible for the FC3 F-15C to receive AIM-9X and AIM-120D missiles in the future? Are they open to it or completely reject it? This move would attract a lot of new people to DCS World!

Setting the preload radius to 100 also helps, because reading a lot of small is better than sometimes reading a BIG that hangs the game. ED should have locked this preload radius to 100 by default long ago and deleted it from the settings! The huge texture size is also a problem, ED solves the whole thing by not caring about these things! (buy faster and bigger) and they are surprised that DCS World is a layered game and not a popular mass game. Buy a big SSD and 64GB of RAM, it leads to the road to unpopularity, not to popularity! If DCS World runs on a toaster they could make a lot more money because a lot more people would spend their money on ED products instead of expensive computer parts!

Because you are wrong about VRAM, if VRAM runs out, it uses physical memory. As long as there is no CPU limit and there is enough memory, the only settings that limit the computer are whether DCS World runs at maximum performance or energy saving or optimal Windows setting. If someone doesn't make the tweaks so that every component in the computer works performance centric, you can talk about whatever you want. If you've done all the tweaks and everything is performance centric and still lags or stutters, you're using graphics settings that are too high. The problem is here: "I even reset my pc" It doesn't even mention how you set up your VR. It is difficult to solve the problem if there is hardly any information! If OP provide more information, we can help him. Guessing is not my table!

" I even reset my pc" This problem is that you are using your computer on default settings. No CPU parking off, power management scheme set to maximum performance, NVIDIA settings optimized for performance rather than quality, and similar tweaks to increase performance.

The memory is low, as it approaches the maximum usage and starts to run out, your computer cannot use more, so it stutters or lags!

Only do it if you have 64GB of RAM! As a first step, do what you said and you will see that your computer will not crash! Then turn off the page file and you will see that your computer will not crash! It recommends 9 GB for the paging file and I have 0! Here is the DCS world without the paging file where I play in multiplayer where DCS World uses much more memory! The page file was invented a long time ago because there was not enough physical memory. I'm sorry you don't try it. Nowadays, you can put as much physical memory in your computer as in a server! There is no difference, except that it does not stress the SSD. Simply, if there is no paging file, only the physical memory is used, the speed of which is dramatically faster compared to the SSD. I have 64 GB of RAM with 4 GB of VRAM and everything on High preset has never crashed since DCS World 2018. It can only crash if it runs out of memory! As long as you only fantasize about your computer crashing and don't try it, you won't experience it. Only DCS World approaches 32GB of memory usage without a paging file, nothing else!