Irisz

If you have 64GB or more ram, you can turn off the page file! I can assure you that you won't have any problems because I've been using my computer this way since 2018. This is only an advantage, for example the SSD does not slow down the memory, once the data is in the memory it will work at the same speed, instead of the SSD drive being tortured to write all the time. The most important thing is that it frees the SSD from a lot of writing. Texture preset Medium, Terrain preset Low and thus the total committed memory usage is 28000 MB. If I set all textures to High, it never reaches 40GB, and this is understandable in multiplayer because DCS World uses memory even less in single player. So your computer will speed up if you do this!

Dear developers! I would like a new function or button for the new DCS World Launcher that turns the Track file recording on and off! Here is the description of the disable track file recording mod: https://forum.dcs.world/topic/178239-disable-track-file-recording-in-mp/ Thanks!

Both aircraft types use R-77 and R-27ER missiles, making them no better against AIM-120C5 carriers. Only the MiG-29SMT Zhuk radar is +-85 degrees Azimuth, which compensates a bit because you can defend yourself with a radar lock after launching a missile, but the problem is the R-77 - AIM-120A level! Even the AIM-120B surpasses the R-27ER missile! The carrier must be a R-77-1 - PL-12 - PL15E - PL-15 missile carrier, otherwise you will just be a target drone like the current R-27ER and R-77 carriers. Fly low and hide against AWACS and datalink, the current carriers are also good! If there will be AIM-120C7 and AIM-120D, the situation will get worse! Eurofighter Meteror missile Maximum range: 200 km (110 nmi)+ No Escape Zone: 60 km (32 nmi)+ The counterpart of this Meteor missile is the RVV-BD missile! If ED decided to make a prototype missile for the Su-27 - Su-33 -J-11A - MiG-29 carriers, which would be the R-27AE, it could ease the tension! If you play against a deliberately weakened opponent, it mentally degrades the player that he is in a situation where he is playing directly against the weak and does not feel comfortable, you need the best of everything!

I thought about the thrust vector control and the N011M Bars radar that it already existed in 1998! The Su-30MKI inherited several technologies from the Su-37, particularly in the areas of thrust vectoring and advanced avionics. The Su-30MKI features a similar thrust vectoring capability, using engines with steerable nozzles to achieve supermaneuverability. Additionally, it incorporates advanced avionics systems that were tested on the Su-37, such as the N011M Bars radar and digital fly-by-wire controls.

It was already ready before the Su-30MKI in 1998! This is the avionics and weaponry that the Su-30MKI inherited! You can check it out! The Su-30MK was not the last in the extensive modernization program for the “thirtieth” series fighters. KnAAPO managed to develop and in 2000 complete the construction of another version of a two-seat multi-role aircraft - the Su-35UB (T-10UBM). His tests began in the fall of the same year in Zhukovsky. The first experimental vehicle has a dark blue tail number "801" and is painted in light blue, blue and dark blue colors. From the name of the fighter one could conclude that it is a combat training modification of the Su-35 aircraft. However, this is not at all true. The aircraft was supposed to incorporate all the best that was done on the Su-37 and both variants of the Su-30MK - Su-30MKI and Su-30MKK. It was planned to install the most advanced avionics and modified AL-31FP engines, in which the nozzle would rotate in two planes (at first the prototype was equipped with conventional AL-31F). According to the project, the Su-35UB differed from the Su-30MKK by having engines and a more advanced on-board radar, and from the Su-30MKI by engines and fins of increased height, thickness and area (as on the Su-35 and Su-30MKK), which made it possible to increase the range flight compared to the Su-30MKI. The installation of more advanced equipment, in particular, the N011M airborne radar, will make it possible to use the entire range of serial and advanced air-to-air and air-to-surface missiles and bombs on the Su-35UB.

The R-33S is indeed a real missile, but it does not have a nuclear warhead. The R-33S is an upgraded version of the original R-33, designed for long-range air-to-air engagements primarily using the MiG-31 interceptor. This variant features enhancements such as digital components and increased fuel capacity, extending its range to about 160 kilometers compared to the original's 120 kilometers. The warhead of the R-33S remains a high-explosive fragmentation type, similar to the original R-33 There is no documented version of the R-33 or R-33S with a nuclear warhead. The R-33 missile, developed by the Soviet Union for use with the MiG-31 interceptor, is primarily a long-range air-to-air missile. There are no widely confirmed reports or documentation indicating that the R-33, or its variants like the R-33S, were officially equipped with nuclear warheads. Most sources, including Weaponsystems.net and Missilery.info, describe the R-33 and R-33S as having high-explosive fragmentation warheads designed for destroying high-altitude targets like bombers However, some sources do mention that the R-33 could potentially be equipped with a "special" warhead, which in Soviet and Russian military terminology often refers to a nuclear payload. This capability seems to be more of a theoretical or proposed adaptation rather than a standard feature of the missile. The focus on high-explosive warheads remains predominant in the available information. 6 different websites support it, but I bet there is no documentation that it has a nuclear warhead! But this highlights that your documentation is highly questionable, because for many years the R-33 missile was listed with a false range in the DCS World. Just as you reduced the range of the R-27ER and that of the R-33, it shows that everything is modified from websites available on the Internet. Modifications: — K-33 (“product 410”) — the name of the project and the missile before it was put into service. — R-33 — basic. — R-33S — modified. It features an active radar seeker, the first Soviet missile equipped with a built-in digital on-board computer. The launch range has been increased to 160 km. Used on MiG-31B, MiG-31M. - R-33E - export version of the R-33S. It's simple, you need to increase ED's income, as it has been described several times on the forum, the American market has more money. There is nothing to explain on this topic. Everything is noticeable, you just have to pay attention. Don't look at what I say, but what I do, it's an old Russian trick!

AMRAAM is not difficult for me, it's just boring because I've been doing it for 15 years! He didn't understand what I said, on the red side, nothing has happened between the 4th generation aircraft for 10 years, this problem, the clickable MiG-29A Export downgraded is not new because it has been there for 12 years at the FC3 level. This way you can understand why so many people become inactive! Not everyone's life goal is to buy everything from the E shop! You are offending REDfor fans with this statement! Because you put a 3rd generation aircraft against a 4th generation and it highlights what I'm talking about! Generation 4.5. These include the latest F-15s and F-16s for overseas customers, and the MiG-35, Su-30, and Eurofighter Typhoon. This is currently completely empty, and there is no sign that they will at least make a 4.5 generation AI aircraft. It would be a simple task to modernize the Su-30 AI bot a bit, simple numbers would have to be rewritten, the weapons it would carry are already in DCS World. When you weakened the range of the R-33 missile with the MiG-31 AI, you also took it in the wrong direction! The update should have looked like you keep the R-33 missile and rename it to R-33S because the old R-33 had a range of 160 km. The new R-33, which is now used by the MiG-31 AI, will be renamed R-33. It could have had two types of R-33 missiles, which favors fans of NATO aircraft. This way you just make the game easier so that you can earn more! The only AI that can attack 4 targets at once is the MiG-31 AI. The Su-30 AI had a Bars radar a long time ago, you removed that as well. I won't add anything to this. Everyone can see that it is not progress! Instead of flying planes, we would simulate AI and not clay pigeon shooting in the 4th generation!

Of course, you must play a lot on PvP servers! On the Growling sidewinder server, you have to equip the PL-12 missile on the J-11A because if you only had the R-77 missile, it would be even more painful. Or we can talk about the concept of the 80s, where the planes of the 2000s against the planes of the late 80s are fun because there is no AMRAAM. The F-16 and FA-18 won't have 80s avionics because you don't put AMRAAM on them! Some believe the marketing, some don't. It's easier to get newbies to do something you tell them! "Here comes the marketing text about DCS World not being balanced" I don't want to argue, I just confirmed what someone else wrote above! Usually those who shoot outdated AI bots in Single player or pretend to be fighter pilots don't understand what I'm talking about. PvP is completely different! All in all, if someone other than me draws attention to this topic, it is not unfounded. My favorite Youtube content producer at the moment, who played Flanker, was inactive for 1 year and now plays something completely different, F4 Phantom, and I would ask him where Flanker is, then he might not be happy with the question! By the way, I haven't played for 2 months either, that's why I'm calm! I really miss Flanker, but I don't want to torture myself on a PvP server!

The old veteran REDfor fans have already left DCS World here. All my favorite YouTube content producers have stopped producing content. If there is a new Youtuber, in 2 or 3 years he will get tired of the whole concept of fighting against NATO equipment that is 20 years more modern. There is also a Twitch stream option that you can watch, 98% are NATO streams, the rest are rookies who have fun with FC3, and since he is a rookie, what he does is not interesting because he has no talent. A conclusion can be drawn. Even though I write or a user writes to the forum to make the FC2024 product interesting, it falls on deaf ears, I gave the most ideas to the developers here on the forum. Just because the MiG-29A Fulcrum will have a clickable cockpit, it won't have a more powerful radar or a longer range air to air missile. This is the case with almost every game, give money, if you are not interested, play another game!

Video 1: I don't see a mistake, the missile faces a lot of dipole charges, which is huge and the dipole charge was actually invented for this! Video 2: You launch the missile at the target at 90 degrees and the spamming of the dipole charge is also a decisive factor in this situation! It would be nice to see the entire air combat sortie, the missile launch in the HUD view and follow the missile. It is possible that you launch the missile at the border of the no escape zone, instead of waiting a bit with a lot of reserve and giving the missile an adequate reserve to defeat the target. At 90 degrees, we don't launch a missile unless we are aware that there are several missiles we can launch to defeat the opponent, not relying on just one missile, waiting for 1 button press 1 kill, which is a mistake! The whole missile launch happens at a disadvantage because you are not at the same altitude as the opponent, this missile launch situation is an ideal situation for an R-27ET missile, not against an opponent flying similar to a 90 degree notch maneuver! Check out this try hard training, how all missiles can be defeated with a simple barrel roll! This is also true in reality, the barrel roll is the most effective missile exhausting and evasive maneuver!

This phenomenon that you call a problem with missiles has been like this for 10+ years. If you fly at a high altitude, the air is not as dense and the missile can maneuver less. If you fly more and practice, sooner or later you will realize that with the high altitude you have to increase your speed in order to have enough compensation in this regard. BVR air combat is not about firing 1 missile and the opponent dies. It is important to learn the missile launch distances, what a missile launched from different distances can and cannot do! I see many players whose knowledge is such that if the AMRAAM is in launch range, they can launch it and that's it, nothing more! If you start dealing with the non maneuvering target range and the no escape zone launch distance, you will be more successful. If you understand what happens when you are at such distances, you can be a more dangerous opponent, not just a player who got on the American train because the American Air Force is the best in the world. This is true, but you have to learn to use this potential, not just be a passenger on a train! The bottom line is that as long as you launch the AMRAAM missile from a non maneuvering target range, you can only scare the enemy, nothing more. As soon as you have no escape zone launch distance from the enemy, the AMRAAM will engage the target and the chance of the MANEUVERING TARGET being destroyed is maximized! That's why I like Flanker better, because it's better to play with it, you can control the opponent better, because the launch of the FOX 1 and FOX 3 missiles is indicated by the opponent's RWR! Learn that you control what happens, don't let the opponent control you! It should also be taken into account that this is a game, not real life, and if a game is too difficult, not many people will play it!

Just a detail of my usual daily data collection that points out other things so that we can see clearly! "The new fighter-bomber was based to a great extent on the design solutions previously adopted for the Su-27SK and the single-seat fighter Su-27M. The first Su-30MKK was built in the spring of 1999, and made its maiden flight on May 20, 1999. The Su-30MKK exported to China is equipped with the RLPK-27VE radar sighting system, fitted with a N001VE (“Slot Back”) track- while-scan coherent Pulse-Doppler radar (with expanded air-to-ground capabilities, including terrain-mapping, and moving target indication). The main upgrades adopted in the N001VE radar (when compared to the older N001E variant) are its ability to simultaneously engage 2 of the 10 targets tracked, its improved digital processing ability (with a BCVM-486-6 processor), and compatibility with the RVV-AE/R-77 MRAAM. N001VE’s search and target acquisition/engagement ranges are practically identical to the performance displayed by the earlier N001V version." Aircraft Models Equipped with N001V Radar Sukhoi Su-27: Su-27SK: The export version of the Su-27, widely used by various countries including China and Vietnam. Su-27SM: An upgraded version of the Su-27S with modernized avionics and radar capabilities. Sukhoi Su-30: Su-30MKK: Export version developed for China, featuring the N001VE radar. Su-30MK2: Enhanced version with N001VEP radar, used by China, Vietnam, Venezuela, and Indonesia. Shenyang J-11: J-11A: Chinese license-produced version of the Su-27SK, which utilizes the N001V radar. J-11A MLU: Mid-life upgrade version of the J-11A with the N001VE radar.

https://forum.dcs.world/topic/239931-too-much-default-skins/?do=findComment&comment=5467476 It's still relevant, and it's depressing! We hope the new DCS World Launcher will allow us to move forward. I would still consider it an easy task to write a code that allows each plane or helicopter / type to contain only 1 skin, and no more! Other players choose any skin and install it on their planes or helicopters, then you will always only see 1 skin, which should be a few hundred MB / per type!

Su-30MKK Radar and visual map of the earth's surface! DEVELOPMENT OF WEAPONS CONTROL SYSTEMS FOR FIGHT AVIATION in the world) into the anterior hemisphere. The maximum distance in the world) in the front nose of the krestrebitel is 50 km. The composition of 03PS includes the Cem of the not found sight of the NSC OEPS TsVM, which also carries out 27. firing from a cannon and the use of weapons not at earthly prices THE SWORD IS IMPROVING NIIP im. V.V. Tikhomirova continues to work on improving the radar station 2001 “Me. Modernized version. “Mecha” is installed on production Su-30MKK aircraft manufactured by KNAAPO for the Chinese Air Force. The work on pairing this indicator with the medium-range air-to-air missile R-77 (RVV-AE) has been completed. Currently, the second stage of modernization of this radar is underway - the development of air-to-surface modes. Test launches of Kh-31A anti-ship guided missiles were carried out, receiving target designation from a radar operating against sea targets in low-resolution mode. Testing has begun in high-resolution mode when working on ground targets. The Su-30MKK is the second one to receive the new designation Su-30MK2. Currently, aircraft of this type are in serial production for a foreign customer. The strategic course of the NIIP management is to use the new generation processors “Baguette-55” developed by the Korund Design Bureau. The results obtained on radars equipped with these processors (in particular, in the Doppler beam narrowing mode) are no worse than those of the most advanced foreign analogues. The software created within the framework of the Su-30MKK and Su-30MK2 programs is expected to be implemented in other programs, in particular, during the modernization of the Zaslon complex and even on a fifth-generation aircraft. After all, if new hardware, as domestic and world experience shows, can be created in three to four years, then to work out the “mathematics” for 40-50 modes (namely, this is the number of modes that the onboard radar complex of a fifth-generation fighter should have) requires at least seven years. The program currently being implemented will significantly improve the performance of the processor. In two to three years, the productivity of Baguette should be increased by more than 40 times. According to a similar scheme, work is underway to gradually modernize the NOO1 radar of the Su-27 and Su-27UB aircraft of the Russian Air Force (the modernized aircraft, designated Su-27SM, began to enter combat units at the end of 2003). Provided sing Rizhinov robdum mapped station 1001: “air detection of ground-based signals, flapping and determination of one’s own speed itself Tank build-up of the computer processor KOS due to the introduction of a modern processor (both salted in parallel with the receiver) allows the station to solve Complete tasks in the air-to-air mode (ultra-range detection , recognition of target type, recognition of targets in a group, work on helicopters, etc.). moving At the next stage of modernization, it is planned to give the locator the possibility of dual-purpose tracking, which will provide the Su-27 with the ability to directly launch two missiles with radar or body guidance at two targets. The practical operation of this mode (intended, first of all, for implementation in the Russian Air Force, modernized over the years) began in May 2002. At the end of the year, the ultra-long-range detection system was tested in a real flight.

The video shows the armament of the Su-30MKK and the Chinese Su-30MKK simulator during combat! I won't comment on what kind of simulator they play with, everyone can see it!

Thanks for the reply! I think it's good for everyone to write down their thoughts on a topic. This is not a buff or a nerf, no one talked about it, it's just the need for the correct implementation! I'm not an average Flanker fan, but a dedicated one, so it affects me differently, it's as simple as that! I may say things, but I say them out of frustration because I want the best for myself and others! DCS World is not a game, so I think the tendency towards professionalism is respectable!

These are just thoughts on which aircraft type is competitive against the AIM-120D and the Meteror missile!

I've been a DCS World Flanker dedicated user since 2013, since I'm new to registration, don't you think I've read what you wrote enough times? The J-11A does not need to violate any military secrets, modify the range of the radar as they did with the F-15C and give it the TWS2 mode that is in the MiG-29C. We have been waiting for this for 6 years! If you write to Deka, he points to Chizh, if you write to Chizh what Deka said, he replies that Deka is the developer of the J-11A and nothing will happen. I report elsewhere that within 1 month, with 2 classified pieces of information, the J-11A was given a N001VE radar and MAWS sensors. Since Deka is the developer of the J-11A and not ED, no one knows why it has been going on for 6 years that they simply look at those who are their customers as air. And I will write it down many times, I have bought FC3 products twice since 2013 and Su-27 products once because this situation is so frustrating that they look like air that I deleted my account several times along with all the purchased products! Tragicomedy going on here! To change the detection distance from 100 km to 120 km and copy a TWS2 mode from the MiG-29C, you do not need a military document. The description of what the radar knows was copied from the manufacturer of the radar itself to the forum and it is still available now. This is what the ED does when it comes to R-27 rockets, it shows the manufacturer's website what the range of the rocket is! Both are done with the same procedure that if someone wants to talk about it. The difference is that in one of them the changes were made, in the other they simply laugh at the one who holds them accountable or they talk back and pass the blame, meanwhile Deka brought the J-11A Flanker and promised modifications because people gave money in the E shop! At the moment, no one on the forum has the courage to say this except me. I don't think I wrote anything that is fantasy or doesn't exist! The J-11A uses a N001VE radar and can attack two targets simultaneously with an R-77 missile in TWS2 mode! J-11A: License produced Su-27SK with N-001VE radar. 45 delivered Nov 04? - 06. Estimated in service 2005. • Su-27SK, J-11 units: CTC - 19th Zhangjiakou 2003 - 16, 55th Jining 2016; ETC - 9th Wuhu 1992 - 2001, 40th Nanchang ? - 2016; NTC -1st Anshan 1992 - 20; STC - 4th Foshan, 6th Suixi 1996 - 2017; WTC - 98th Chongqing ? - 2008, 16th Yinchuan, 18th Lintao Mar 21. • J-11A units: CTC - 21st Zhangjiako ? - 2016; ETC - 41st Wuyishan Apr 12?; 86th Quzhou 2008-12; NTC - 1st Anshan ? - 2008; WTC - 98th Chongqing 2008, 111th Korla 2016. • 1996: L-203 Gardeniya-F1UE jammer pods available. Two pods replace two R-73 in above loadouts. • Apr 97: Three were lost and 14 others damaged when they were caught in a typhoon at Fujian airbase. • 2000: R-27ER and R-27ET available. • 2002: RVV-AE available. Can replace R-27 in above loadouts. • 2004: Su-27SK and J-11 updated to N-001VE radar from this date. More than 60 converted by Dec 2006. Estimated KL-609A pods replace L-203. • 25 May 14: First exercises using highway as runway. Elsewhere this source is accepted and implemented on the J-11A Flanker to have N001VE radar, here in DCS World you are paying for a reskinned Su-27 R-77 missile option that has nothing to do with the J-11A: chinas-navy-ships-and-aircraft-of-the-peoples-republic-of-china-1955-2021_compress.pdf I'll get an ED marketing text for this as well, and until then I'll have to stand on one leg and nobody cares!

At least I'm trying to change something! In that topic, the NATO fans nicely decide what is needed and what is not. Those who don't like NATO equipment have a slightly different opinion about what ED does and where it is going! There are people whose thoughts are not guided by the marketing text written by ED and who can think independently about what they want!

It must be understood that the airplane is only a carrier and nothing more. The type and range of the radar, as well as the missile used, determine whether or not the given type of aircraft is attractive and competitive. The Su-30MKI is better than the Su-30MKK only in terms of radar. It has no better missile than the PL-12 missile. Except maybe the K100 missile, of which it carries three and has a range of 400 km and was developed against AWACS! So it would be interesting for some people, but not competitive in practice. Not to mention that it's a complete Russian military secret, so forget it. The solution is a Su-30MK2 or J-11B, but the real timeless, which will remain competitive even after the arrival of the METEOR and AIM120D missiles, is the J-11BG or J-15. These types use PL-12 and PL-15 missiles, which would make them valuable for years. The Su-30MKI use Astra MK1 missile has a range of 80 km, and the PL-12 has a range of 100 km. It also has R-77, which is not competitive. You can see that the PL-12 missile is better, so the SU-30MKI is not better! Su-30SM2 and R-37M... there is no question that they are a Russian military secret! I want a single seat Flanker anyway! Let's face it, Flaming Cliffs is dead after the 90s! Deka doesn't even want N001VE on the J-11A Flanker. As for elsewhere, I can't describe where, it will arrive with N001VE and MAWS sensors, and is considered basic. Here at DCS World, we have been waiting for 6 years for them to fulfill what we gave money for. (I bought the FC3 product twice) Even more annoying! NATO equipment above all else! I'm not asking for an ED marketing text response, thank you very much!

I'll show you what FC2024 needs! ED is itself a limit to its development, because it makes senseless decisions, while there is a need for something other than the production of NATO equipment on an assembly line! I think that for the existing Su-27 - Su-25 and MiG-29 aircraft, only the cockpit should be modified and a completely new product could be produced. There is no need to develop an external model of the aircraft. There is no need to develop new aircraft flight models because they are already ready. Look at what kind of gaming experience the modernized Su-25 would give to the FC2024 product! A new plane? Would it generate revenue for the ED? Entertaining? Will it advance the development of DCS World? Attracting new players to DCS World? A refresher for those who don't fly with NATO equipment and want something new? Is ED deliberately limiting the development of such aircraft in order to lose money? These are interesting thoughts!

ED do you see this? I'm talking about this! This proposal will make you a lot of money! The current FC3 product is not attractive! Look at what this wonderful person wrote about how many people could come here to the DCS world and you are blocking all of this! I don't lose much if I delete my account, in fact I do it because my health is already damaged by waiting 6 years and not getting anything. Meanwhile, I bought FC3 product twice and Su-27 product once to get J-11A, which currently has nothing to do with the real thing! My proposal requires little work, it doesn't break any secrets, but it will attract a lot of people to DCS World! You said it yourself that it is your most successful product! You could be even more successful! I may be stupid and discredit myself, but it's worth it to me because I really like the Flanker! Show ED how much you love your community! I fight for what I love! Apologies to those who are bothered by this!