Irisz

The first person who understood the 1st post! The J-11A cannot be implemented even at FC3 level because it is a military secret! Since FC2024 is coming soon and the one I recommended would not even require 1 day of work from ED, in return no one would write about such a problem on the forum for 10 years! Just read "show secret military documents" and nothing will happen! Because everyone has to present documents if they want something that is impossible! I didn't ask for anything that wasn't impossible! Anyone who plays on online PvP servers feels the misery I'm talking about! Those who are not the maximum can think about it, but they don't feel it, so they don't feel the weight of what I'm talking about. I'm not asking for myself, but on behalf of the entire Flanker fan community, because we experience the agony every day when we come here and play with DCS World. I didn't ask for any classified military secrets, just to make the game more enjoyable and more people to give their money to ED! Modifying a radar and installing 2 missiles on an airplane, I bet it takes no more than 1 hour of work, and it will solve a lot of problems for 10 years!

This is a dead idea! No one will pay for this when you can already play Su-27SM and MiG-29SMT for free in other games. There is also a J-11A that has MAWS sensors. The Su-27SM3, the Su-37, and further up to the Su-35S and even the Su-57 are being prepared. DCS World is dead on the Red side because NATO products sell better. FC2024 is also only about saving the development of MAC and not wasting what they have done, there are enough lay people who pay for such things! DCS World would need more flyable FC3 products, but since it is not profitable, this idea is stillborn. They are only interested in what they can do to make money. They don't even deal with existing problems because it doesn't generate direct money for them. Always buy the new product and there will be no problems, then they will treat you as a special customer!

I don't know, and I can't help you with that. I'm not an expert. I found a source that describes the history of Chinese aircraft, and it contained the information I linked above. I would suggest removing the "A" from the name of the FC3 J-11A. It should receive the PL-12 and PL-15 missiles under the name J-11. Additionally, its radar detection distance should be increased to 150 km against a 5 sq meter target. This problem, which hasn't been addressed for years, would finally be solved. The J-11BG is still a modernization of the J-11A. It does not violate military secrets to simply adjust its radar, and the missiles are not classified as they are still in DCS World. They dare not say that there will never be an advanced Flanker in DCS World. The MiG-29C and Su-27S in the clickable version are not more effective in aerial combat, as both are obsolete against modern NATO aircraft. Even a Su-27SM would not be competitive, just as the Su-30MKK is not competitive. My idea for the J-11 would be fun for everyone who likes the Flanker! Unfortunately, the only way to build a NATO simulator is with this marketing text that ED has drilled into everyone's brain. They are unable to allow a special case where the aircraft of the FC series are concerned! If nothing has happened since 2018, nothing will happen after that. Even the third-party developers can't create an outdated N001VE radar! It's just annoying that I came back to the DCS World again because everything is about NATO equipment, and nobody cares that we Flanker fans exist. No one will reveal secret military documents to them! The entire FC series is only good for laymen to pay for it! Sorry for the strong criticism!

No, it is not competitive against AIM-120D and Meteor missiles, there is no long range mode in N001VE radar. This mode gives the N001VEP a detection range of 150 km, which is a satisfactory performance for the PL-12 missile. Look at our N001 radar on the J-11A, it can be used up to 60 km but rather 50 km, it is useless above that, and its detection distance is 100 km! It is only good for serving the R-27ER and RVV-AE because it is effective at about these distances, which is what the N001 can do! The PL-12 missile cannot be mounted on the MKK because the MKK is made entirely of Russian components. The PL-12 missile was installed on the MK2! The PL-12 missile equals and the PL-15 missile surpasses the AIM-120D and Meteor missiles.

I hope everyone can see that the Su-30MKK would also be a useless target drone on PvP servers because it uses N001VE radar, RVV-AE missile and not have PL-12 missile. The N001VE radar does not have a long range mode, which gives a range of 150 km for target detection, and this is where the Su-30MK2 comes in using the PL-12 missile that was added in 2015. My opinion is that the Su-30MK2 N001VEP is needed for the current DCS World situation with the PL-12 missile, because the AIM-120D missile has not yet appeared and the Meteror missile are not here. The solution is called FC3 or full fidelity J-15 or J-11BG because it has a PL-15 missile with a range of 200 or 300 km. With its 145 km range, the PL-15E missile would surpass the current PvP NATO aircraft in the situation before the Meteor and AIM-120D missiles! If you want to be competitive you have to surpass the enemy in some way, either missile or piloting skills! The Su-35SK would also be a target drone because it does not have an RVV-BD missile with a range of 200 km. The absolute beast would be the Russian Su-35S and R-37M with a range of 396 km, they call it Satan in the sky! My dream aircraft would also be a target drone, and this is the FC3 style Su-37, a real masterpiece! At the moment, I was fighting to get the Ukrainian modernized R-27ET missile on the J-11A, which would be invisible and quite fun, but they don't allow that either. 100 km maximum detection distance with the infrared homing head.

But it was planned, this was announced years ago by the CEO of ED, a very high-ranking person on the forum! Ask others about this and they will confirm it!

I think the problem is that long ago, for financial reasons, ED decided to only make a fully clickable cockpit, which brings more money to the kitchen! The main problem is that FC3 was mixed in, which used to have a functionality. Removethe datalink from the MiG-29, remove the R-27EM missile! The automatic lock on vertical scan mode removed, simulated a more detailed radar behavior, which made the Flanker and Fulcrum radars weaker. There are many more things that could be listed, but here I have described how big improvements ED values, these are actually function removals from a purchased product, which reduce its value and take away happiness from users, because the value of FC3 is constantly decreasing! This is also feedback and then it goes down the drain as usual! Sorry if my criticism is too strong, but this is the reality!

FC3 is not full fidelity! Let me start listing what is missing from the real Su-27? The flight model is also not real because the real Su-27 accelerates faster in horizontal flight. They showed the developers that a Su-27UB, which has more air resistance, accelerates faster than the FC3 Su-27. The FC3 MiG-29C's radar does not detect at greater distances than the FC3 MiG-29A. There is no peer-to-peer datalink connection between Flankers. The real Su-27 uses ground control to see targets on its MFD and can attack them using datalink. I have already presented everything here, but unfortunately there is someone who blocks everything if someone makes a suggestion. It took him 15 years to admit that the R-27EP rocket existed! I didn't want to be disrespectful, but somehow it's tiring that everyone on the ED forum pretends to know nothing about the problem and constantly has to prove it in every case and the end result is NOTHING! I have already described the result of how many times I deleted my account. 2 of my friends also stopped playing DCS world because of these things and play in a place where the developers are interested in what the players want! Here on the ED Forum, this section is practically dead! A lot of people have advised me to keep quiet, but I love Flanker so much that I can't keep these things to myself! You know why DCS World is often mocked, and sometimes they do so rightly! I don't even want to read marketing answers because I know them all by heart!

I didn't ask ED to develop a new plane for free! I would like to quietly indicate that elsewhere they already fly with Su-27SM aircraft and 1000% that there will be Su-27SM3 and Su-37 as well. I asked for simple things, e.g. rewriting the numbers for the rockets in the code, which would keep the FC3 product attractive and nothing more! In many cases, these requests require 10 minutes of work! The texture update of the FC3 product required much more free work! The fact that everything is linked to military documents actually puts a wall in front of the ED so that it cannot develop. Only in the case of FC3, the ED could be a little more lenient in this area. Because in many cases ED is unattractive and your product loses money! Thank you for the answer!

"Sorry" won't change anything! Unfortunately, I don't feel any indication that the Flanker will get anything new in FC2024. We are not making progress with just texture updates! There used to be an R-27EM missile in the FC series, but it was removed! They also removed the datalink function from the FC3 MiG-29 series! The range of the R-27 missile family has been reduced! I asked on the forum for a compromise solution to make FC2024 attractive, which would require about 10 minutes of work from a developer, but everything I try to do here on the forum simply hits a wall! Updating the R-27T, R-27ET, and R-73 homing heads doesn't require secret military documents! The range of the N001VE radar is publicly available on the forum, and others besides me have helped ED find information. Is this also illegal and against military law? There are options for an updated Ukrainian homing head for the R-27ER, which would give the R-27ER the option of an active homing head. In this case, you would only need to modify 2 lines of code and create the existing missile using the copy paste method, everything else is available. Is this also a military secret and impossible? Why has it been impossible to make any changes for 15 years? Please, respectfully, let the right person answer. Honestly, I don't expect such an answer like it's unnecessary and there's no time for it because it doesn't pay! Why was there time to update the textures but not address these needs, which are only corrections?

Due to these issues, I left DCS World around 2016, uninstalled the game, and deleted my account, on which I had spent money, just to get rid of the frustration caused by these problems. In 2018, the J-11A Flanker and the MFI-55 display were announced for the J-11A, and I returned. However, there was no 50% sale on FC3, so I bought it at full price because I felt it was a significant update that would finally provide an advanced Flanker, giving me what I had expected from ED after 9 years. In 2021, I left DCS World again delete account and uninstalled the game because the more modern J-11A still had not been released. There is no N001VE radar, which is slightly better than the Su-27's N001 radar. In the meantime, I purchased a Su-27 product from the E shop and soon after deleted my account again. Now, here we are in 2024. I got my original account back that I deleted in 2016, and I'm still here trying to bring information about the J-11A to the forum, where only one person seems interested. When I speak to the developers, I am met with indifference and rejection, especially when discussing the need for something attractive for FC3 with the arrival of FC2024. I have spent a lot of money and I'm still in the same place I was in 2016. There is a fantasy Su-27 that can use the R77 missile and is named J-11A. They are unable to correct the radar as they did with the F-15C. It's incredibly frustrating that if it's a NATO plane, it's an immediate priority, but if someone talks about a Russian or Soviet plane, they are immediately asked to present secret documents. Meanwhile, the entire FC3 is based on fantasy because it does not accurately reproduce the capabilities of real airplanes, only approximately. I don't understand why we have to wait 6 years for a radar range correction. I just wait and wait and wait, but I don't know why!

Here are the misunderstandings why the disinformation is spreading that the J-11A carries a PL-12 missile!

The MiG-29M2 is a multi-role fighter-bomber developed by RSK MiG. The export designation of the aircraft is MiG-29MRCA. The single and double-seat versions of the MiG-29M / MiG-29M2 aircraft are fundamentally new aircraft with an increased flight range, modern on-board equipment, a quadruple redundant three-channel digital fly-by-wire control system, an increased combat load and an expanded range of on-board weapons. The cabs are equipped with liquid crystal multifunctional indicators. The HOTAS principle is implemented. The integrated weapons control system includes a modified radar sighting system with a new Zhuk-ME radar, an optical location station and a helmet-mounted target designation system. On external hardpoints, fighters can carry guided air-to-air missiles RVV-AE, R-27ER1, R-27ET1, R-27R1, R-27T1, R-73E, air-to-surface missiles Kh-29T, Kh- 29L, Kh-31A, Kh-31P, Kh-35E, adjustable bombs KAB-500KR (OD), KAB-500L, as well as unguided missile and bomb weapons. In addition, the aircraft is equipped with a built-in GSh-301 cannon. The aircraft's radar allows it to detect air targets at ranges of up to 120 km, track ten of them and simultaneously attack four targets. When working against surface targets of the destroyer type, the detection range is 250 km, and for targets of the missile boat type - 150 km. MiG-29M/M2 aircraft are distinguished by: High combat effectiveness in difficult operating conditions; Excellent flight performance; Excellent performance characteristics, reliability and safety indicators; Perfect logistics, low operating costs; In-flight refueling system; Fly-by-wire digital aircraft control system - 3-channel, with 4-fold redundancy; New architecture of the onboard equipment complex, cockpit information and control field, HOTAS (unification with the MiG-29K and MiG-29SMT); An integrated weapons control system, including a modified radar sighting system with a new Zhuk-ME radar with increased ranges, multi-channel fire and modern air-to-surface modes, an optical radar station and a helmet-mounted target designation system; New navigation, radio communications, radio countermeasures, control and registration systems, containers with optronics and reconnaissance systems. Weapon system, including air-to-air guided missiles RVV-AE, R-27ER1, R-27ET1, R-27R1, R-27T1, R-73E, built-in GSh-301 cannon, air-to-surface guided weapons X- 29T(TE), Kh-29L, Kh-31A, Kh-31P, Kh-35, KAB-500KR(OD), KAB-500L, unguided missile and bomb weapons. МИГ-29MRCA Многоцелевой истребитель-бомбардировщик

OLS-27 and KOLS and all infra red homing heads will not be able to see through the cloud in the future, so we will be weaker in this regard as well, so don't be happy!

I did it just for myself, I can't do more on the forum to make Flanker and Fulcrum a bit better, the Digital NATO Combat Simulator brings more money to ED! We are just target drones! I feel sorry for those people who don't dare to criticize ED and blindly follow them no matter what they do! A better future, comrades!

This is exactly what I'm talking about! MiG and Su aircraft types can aim at 60 degrees with a helmet sight!

Thanks for the reply! I tried to gather all the information to ask the question! Thank you for informing the forum about what is happening with the Soviet and Russian missiles. Is it possible for this mark 1 to appear in DCS World? Perhaps the appearance of the Ukrainian R-27ET1 with a more modern better homing head is possible? This would benefit the J-11A and other Ukrainian aircraft as well. As I said, Ukraine uses these and China bought the license to produce them itself! I don't think it violates military secrets. I see this one rocket as an opportunity to be a real blood update with the release of FC2024. Perhaps it could also appear as R-27ET and without the 1 marking? I just want FC2024 to be attractive when it comes out! Basically ED rejects all such questions and requests to get a more modern R-27 missile into DCS World? I think there is enough evidence on the Internet that these are not 34 year old missiles preserved in wooden boxes! The bottom line is that I want, and I think many others want, that anything, whatever is possible, for us Flanker fans to be a little better when FC2024 comes out! Unfortunately, there is no reassuring information about FC2024 that has been published so far! The new R-73L is quite attractive among game files, if perhaps its homing head is better and more modern! 1984 R-73 used the Mayak-80 (MK-80) seeker which is a single-block single-channel seeker. Lockon range is 8-12km, off-boresight capability +-45 deg, field of view +-45 deg. It still used to this day on R-73E missiles in production. Mayak-80M (MK-80M) appears to be a version modified for use on the R-27T/ET, which replaced the earlier 36T seeker at some point, rather than an an upgraded seeker for the R-73. 1995-1996 Improved R-73M mentioned. R-73M1 and R-73M2 designations used by Janes (erroneously) for basic and improved R-73, with the latter having increased off-bore capability of +-60 deg. Trials said to have begun in 1994.

Overall, I would like to make forum members aware that if someone searches or talks about R-27 missiles marked 1 on this forum, it is not about the OLD Soviet missiles. So in the case of ED, if you use these missiles as information about what it can do, you create a fantasy missile in DCS World. Because the Su-27 - Su-33 MiG-29 missiles use OLD Soviet Vympel missiles manufactured around 1990. However, if ED uses the data of the current EXPORT missiles, the homing head of the missile is from 2024, and its export engine is from 1990! Su-27SK weakened manual Export not oroginal and better Su-27S manual! MiG-29 9-29B Export manual (weakened export) not original and better Soviet MiG-29 9-12 or 9-13 or 9-13S product! This is the problem, that's why the range of the missiles is reduced! I don't understand why this doesn't bother anyone! Meanwhile, the Russian and Ukrainian missiles went through development, where the Ukrainian developed a proven better R-27ET1 homing head and active homing head R-27 missile! You don't need to create a new CFD simulation for these, just use designation 1 and update the missiles homing heads of the Ukrainian Su-27 and Fulcrum! China manufactures its own R-27 missiles by licensing them from Ukraine, so the J-11A should also receive these new R-27 1 designation missiles. If no one here is interested in this, then as a business decision ED weakens the R-27 missile as it wants, in order to sell more NATO products in the ED shop. Therefore, FC2024 is not attractive because it does not solve any problems that have accumulated over the years. It's only good for attracting lay new users who don't know anything! German MiG-29 (9.12A) - Downgraded export version of the MiG-29 (9.12) MiG-29G the main upgrade in this variant is the availability of the R-27ET1 and R-27ER1 and R-73E missiles which its older predecessor, the MiG-29 (9.12) lacked. The true advantage in this model lies in its airframe type; while the older East German MiG-29 and its Soviet counterpart, the MiG-29 (9.13) lack the advanced R-73 and R-27ET missiles. To make the DCS world authentic with the MiG-29G, there is neither R-27ER1 R-27ET1 nor R-73E among its weapons! So he uses unmarked missiles. As the R-73L appeared recently in the DCS World game files, these missiles could also appear. Again, these are just renamings, and based on the available data, a developer will rewrite the homing head parameters in 10 minutes and add real value to the FC2024, which will make it attractive to more people to buy and those veteran DCS World users will not uninstall DCS World because the current FC3 product is not fun and enjoyable!

Overall, I would like to make forum members aware that if someone searches or talks about R-27 missiles marked 1 on this forum, it is not about the OLD Soviet missiles. So in the case of ED, if you use these missiles as information about what it can do, you create a fantasy missile in DCS World. Because the Su-27 - Su-33 MiG-29 missiles use OLD Soviet Vympel missiles manufactured around 1990. However, if ED uses the data of the current EXPORT missiles, the homing head of the missile is from 2024, and its export engine is from 1990! Su-27SK weakened manual Export not oroginal and better Su-27S manual! MiG-29 9-29B Export manual (weakened export) not original and better Soviet MiG-29 9-12 or 9-13 or 9-13S product! This is the problem, that's why the range of the missiles is reduced!

Ukraine MiG-29 simulator!

R-27R or R-27ER information, knowledgeable people know what it is! Link: https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/69/d1/79/4740f42ef147c3/RU2259536C1.pdf

In its activities, Rosoboronexport supports implementation of large-scale projects aimed at the improvement of defense capacity of partner countries, and at comprehensive consolidation and innovative development of enterprises and entities of Russia’s MIC. http://roe.ru/eng/rosoboronexport/status/ What do you think this suggests? It supports other projects, it is described above that they have become separate! Or explain why it is rational to produce exactly the same missile with two different companies in Ukraine and Russia? What I described seems very true! Or here is another interesting question that shows that what I wrote seems to be confirmed! http://roe.ru/eng/catalog/aerospace-systems/ What do you see here? Original Russian products that exist only in Russia or downgraded export products that are not dangerous for Russia! For example, I would like to draw your attention to the fact that the Su-30SM2 already exists and the Su-35S also has a new and better radar from the Irbis-E radar. Which leads us to conclude that since the Su-30SM and Su-35S are outdated, they can be exported because Russia has better, more modern weapons than these aircraft. Even so, you can conclude why Russia would not use Export products. Russia uses R-37M not Export RVV-BD. To write another example. The RVV-BD has a range of 200 km, and the R-37M has a range of 398 km. And they have an 810 product with an even greater range, exclusively for the Su-57! That's why you should ask him what ED is doing, because he really doesn't like to talk about what's going on. It just pretends that this is an improvement, while the range of the missiles decreases. The point is to put together what's going on, I'm just criticizing things so that everyone is adequately aware that they're getting the best in the DCS World gaming experience! I want the best!

Read here that the Ukrainian missiles have nothing to do with Vympel! "The Ukrainian company Artyom has received a contract worth more than $ 200 million from a foreign customer, involving the production of medium-range R-27 air-to-air guided missiles [...], Defense Blog reports. The publication does not name a specific customer, assuming that we are talking about an Asian country, presumably India or Indonesia. According to the Defense Blog, the signed agreement was the largest for Artem over the past 10-15 years. The Ukrainian company, as the publication notes, has already received an advance payment and has begun to fulfill the order. Defense Blog reminds that the P-27 was developed by the Russian design bureau "Vimpel" and was mass-produced by Russia and Ukraine. According to the publication, these missiles are designed for MiG-29, MiG-31, Su-27, Su-30, Su-33, Su-34 and Su-35 aircraft." https://vpk.name/en/527760_ukraine-has-received-the-largest-contract-for-the-production-of-russian-r-27-missiles.html That's exactly what I wrote above! The ED quietly does not say anything about this! Here you can see the Old R-27ER and R-27ET missiles! Try this altitude against a MiG-31 flying at 20,000 meters at 2,500 km/h and flying head on, if you sweat blood, it won't go over 100 km! I think this is a deliberate weakening!

The range for the R-27ER is reduced from 130 km to 95 km! For the sake of export, so that it is not dangerous for Russia. I want to focus on this, to clarify what the developers are doing, because this is a deliberate weakening of the missiles because they have no other information. It should have been an upgrade with the same ranges, not a 35km reduction! Focus on export, all weapons are export downgraded versions, not genuine Russian or Soviet products!