Migow

mission CAS without ground afac ? russia use pilot on the ground he say where you shoot ,when, he use WP marking on friendly so no mistake then WP on enemy (different color) i can do that with trigger but there is no true interactive communication plus it 's horrible to program that in the editor... cas missions especially if target is close of friendly unit are insane without jtac (or afac on the ground) (AI) air interdiction for deep strike in enemy zone (no friendly) we need good mission brief with target point in pvi , threat, good ingress -egress ^^,eventually su24m afac to designate target with wp and coordinate especially if enemy are moving "Besides, having the JTAC for coordinates can be tricky, because he's not in the code of the shark..." -> that 's why i want a russian jtac who tell us coordiante L/L (the last one in decimal or second (choice)) in fact we need to choose ingame the coordinate format. i need some knowledge about procedure about these two type mission:thumbup:

hi the manpad (russia) in the game are sa 18 igla S (sa 24) but they launch "sa 18 gimlet"(wrong designation? gimlet =sa16) missile (with lower ECCM if sa 16) so witch is the good one

hi , it would be great if jtac can provide coordinate with longitude/latitude in degree or decimal (pilot choice ka 50 )or mgrs (a10) :bounce: with WP marking .

Improved Helicopter AI (HAI): • When analyzing a tactical situation, the HAI will take in account all threats, not only the target that the HAI is engaging. • If it possible to engage targets from a safe distance, the HAI will not fly close to threats. If it appears that the HAI is not at a safe position. If too close to enemy air defenses, for example, the HAI will fly away from away the threat(s) and then start engaging targets from safe a distance. • If it appears impossible to engage targets from safe distance, the HAI will make only one short attack (one missile launch / rocket salvo or cannon burst per run. ) from maximum range of that weapon and then breakaway to make new attack if required. This reduces fire effectiveness, but it greatly increases HAI survival when engaging targets with cannon or rockets. Of course, the HAI will never hover in an unsafe location. • If high-priority targets are screened by low-priority targets that makes impossible to attack high-priority target from safe distance, the HAI will attack low-priority targets first to break the screen. In other words, if you have line of enemy APCs and tanks at 4 km and enemy AAA and SAMs at 12 km, the HAI will engage those APCs and tanks first. No more flying over the enemies heads. • Jinking anti-flak maneuvering has been added. When flying in the WEZ of AAA, tanks, and APCs, the HAI will fly at high speed and jink. Of course, HAI will not jink when aiming at a target. :thumbup: at once :)

right engine automatic start... hi ,i bought recently the hotas warthog : in rampstart in MP when i start a mission as host or client the right engine begin to start... even if i "reinitialized" the trottle... the trottle are idle physically and virtually in SP there is no problem even if i move trottle and "reinitialized" the trottle here a track server-20110918-202423.trk

hi, (1.1.0.9) ->the jtac has another bug (night mission) i start jtac conversation(type 2) then i report ip bound on ip i say IN when i go on target he say clear hot when i finish an attack i say OFF to jtac then i go to ip , i report ip bound but it happen nothing // first bug and if i stop jtac cooperation , and ask again it say the job is finished which is wrong // second bug (so 2 bug?) track bugjtac.trk -> i got another bug the game crash after i say IN , i say unable to comply (i missed the attack) the game crash mission test5.miz

hi (1.1.0.9) , there is a bug with jtac designation ,he successfuly designate the target in the first group then in the second group he shifts from the target and designates near the target and sometimes he designates anywhere :D miz jtaclasertrouble.miz track lasertrouble.trk need debug :thumbup: thx

hi , yeah need virtual rudder :thumbup:

hi,i never stated ka50 > ah64D i stated ka50 is less useless than i thought because of STI -> who said that you have to use only one sensor...) as if i don't have the knowledge about what you said... it is even written in the doc ... the ah64D against stationary target can't be used without optics that a serious drawback , the helo must expose himself .... that make RFhellfire useless (plus there more expensive) maybe there are useful if target is identified before it use smoke obscurant the longbow was made so they should not use optic and would not be exposed to enemy fire .it can only work with moving target ->"I have no doubt that this provides faster target acquisition than solely using the relatively narrow field of view of the IIR/CCD sensors" they said they don't use STI , they use flir instead especially in high clutter urban zone . they dont have faster target acquisition because of false alarm.

hi what 's the russian rockets price?(wholesale price) s8 variant? s13 variant? and vihkr missile?

it's stated that russian manpad in DCS have SA 18S igla but when they launch their missile it's sa16 gimlet with worse resilience to IR jamming than SA 24 (SA18 S) so what is it ? SA 24 or SA 16 gimlet? please fix the mistake^^.

you don't understand what i mean it was ironic : i mean none existent communication in this game between sead su 24m and ka 50 is unreal and non sense as my" rwr" and as the compaign in this game also stop talking realism when you see the mission in the official compaign in the helo many thing lack like inu drift,gps in mountain should not properly work, hot start engine , warm start etc... nonsense autorotation

:)

SARH in modern fighter (datalink in the missile) in the last moment the aircraft use CW on the target RWR should detect it and alert pilot in this last moment

terrain masking don't work when you need to engaged enemy again it doesn't work when bad recon

russian common sense = lot attrition of ther own planes against georgia :megalol:

it has to be confused, it make it useless even if roe are free weapon will many attack would be useless(on wrong target false alarm or FF) with expensive weapon

hi i need some info please(your info are precious )about STI mode on ah64d longbow in this topic http://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=80276

well it's common sense to equip with rwr mws etc when you have high threat sam environement it's cheaper than loosing 15 millions dollar helo and good pilot because of sam when he could use terrain masking if he knew he was tracked by sam

hi the ratio kill of sam tor etc is too low i have seen a f16 flying the tor shot 8 missile no one hit f16 (it has a 95 -90 ratio on plane) jamming against them should not denying range (tor ,tunguska ,buk ,s300)info -> frequency bumping ->and laser rangefinder please correct that another thing the SR radar should be on rarely the track radar should be on only when target is near the missile range it should track only by few time , and in continue in the end course missile the tor, s300 , should be able to intercept harm bomb almost everything

:megalol::megalol:

"Further, emerging Rules of Engagement were unlikely to permit radar engagement, particularly of stationary targets, without some visual or infrared confirmation. We reported that the Longbow fire control radar approach to stationary target engagement would only rarely be useful: The forward-looking infrared was a better sensor for stationary targets, and it could cue the RF Hellfire missile more accurately than the fire control radar in the stationary target case.1" and i thought STI was useful :megalol:

if needed they could set a2a missile on ka 50 if needed again in the case of conflict where they need it the simulator is not flexible in those case (iran irak war)

like you said they surely adapt rwr to ka 50 in case of high threat sam if they use it in this case (just check NATO in serbia 1999 ,impossible DEAD mission) i will add that this game is a simulator which mean the conflict doesn't exist or almost , still the official compaign have high threat sam and plane(f18) threat , and they call this realistic in dcs? with ka 50 without rwr nice joke...

that why they should model them before i read the doc about sti unreliable STI , i thought it was used every time ands reliable, now no wonder why in serbia NATO could hardly spot sam (even with Elint ,optic recon)