szymixzmb

We can already put "Not correct for DCS version" tag as we will have a version from around 2015 but in general the idea to integrate more drones into DCS would be great.

Haha, okay, that's insane, my bad. I have seen K239 Chunmoo few times so I had to connect it in my mind. Sorry for the trouble

Uhm, okay. If I can give my voice, I would prefer it how it is in real life, it would be nice if ATACMS looks like ATACMS. I would be grateful if you reconsider it My guess is that you did it that way because we can't have two types of missiles in one launcher currently (however reloading procedure and ability to choose would be freaking awesome, maybe one day) so in bigger scenarios it may make sense as it can be any within 10 minutes.

That's actually before launch. Even in a preview it does not display with ATACMS missile, it displays 6 GMLRS rockets.

It's probably a known issue to you but wanted to report as it wasn't fixed in today's patch.

I noticed similar problem but in later missions. That's very weird even with RTX 5090 and 9800X3D I cannot reach these 75 FPS on some missions at the end of the campaign. I remember when I was creating a mission myself and with even nearly empty map some combination caused the FPS to drop significantly so that's rather a DCS bug.

I also had this issue few times (I tried to complete it maybe 15 times). I am nearly sure it's because the trigger zone is closer than the waypoint itself so if you have set 12:24:00 on CRUS page you are reaching it earlier

That's the module I am expecting the most. I thought that I will never get but the best option is that we forget about it for 2 years and they will release it without any prior teaser.

@WHOGX5 I want F16 in the best possible state so feel free to write a report but if you want to change the way of working you need to attach this real world manual. It would be much easier then to convince ED

What I mean that some people here thinks that the quality of the image of the sniper does not take to the account that the videos (reference material) is compressed

Exactly, if we want to change something we need to provide reference material

What we need now is the comparison of real life sniper image without compression otherwise that's an endless discussion. ED will not change something because "we think". From my perspective the DCS image compared to the compressed video is better so probably a little bit adjusted for compression but @Nedum states that it should be much better. Probably the last image I posted is this most real we can get image but it is only from 4.9 NM. However it shows that there is not so much difference between TV and IR cameras in real life. In DCS PIP shows bigger difference.

@NineLine In the attachment there is the same for Kola map. As you can see in the track, that is not only the issue for taxiways and runways bur in general all objects have this weird "flickering" effect. Also in the track I managed to catch the example where XR does not fix all of taxiways , just some of them. First time I noticed it on Persian Gulf so there is high probability that it is for all maps. dcs.log tgp-kola.trk

I think only the original image can tell us the truth. If only somebody has it

@Nedum Good points, I compared to what I could, makes sense with compressed video however if it's not compressed I do not think it will change the quality massively. If you take a look at Naro X4 at original, you can see how blurry the picture is, to be honest in that case DCS picture looks better but maybe it's because of the contrast. I totally agree with aliasing that should be corrected and a different way of making picture worse should be found like grain effect for example.

Will we get sniper Pod for Weasels over Syria both campaigns? I waited to start them until it gets updated but is there anything to wait for?

In the attachment dcs.log tgp.trk

When I use Sniper and zoom on the airport the lines are dotted and these dots are moving. I am aware that the image quality shouldn't be very good but the objects shouldn't be pixelated so much. They should rather appear as blurry and with a grain effect

I did myself a comparison and I do not see any error here, very accurate simulation. There are of course scenarios we cannot compare due to lack of reference material.

I also noticed this with Litening previously but I didn't report it as I thought with Sniper they would revise and test everything anyway so that should be corrected. It's a strange topic, compare Wags video Part 1 and 2 for ATP. In the first one , the cooridantes are going crazy but in the second one they are very steady.

I hope not, there are bunch of more important stuff even from the current roadmap

I am also on the simulation side, if your outcome is that other pods are overperforming just downgrade it

Is there any chance to change maps to have at least one at EU theater? I know it's expeditionary wing but Germany or Kola instead of Persian Gulf would be great

I strongly support this idea, especially modern map with parts of Belarus and Baltics, that would be amazing

Just finished it. I also had an issue with spotting all the action but this is the moment when you make yourself a better pilot. Every mission of each campaign I didn't pass at first, I learned something new. E.g. in this mission I tried to correct the GBU strike point by the little and I missed so decided to do it again. But when you think about it why should you correct pre-planned strike in real life? Also taking account the impact angle of JDAM and the position from the aircraft, if you want to hit a building that high at 60 degrees you need to point behind him.