RvEFuSiOn

Seems like everyone is a know it all on the forums? Where do you get your info from ? Internet? Anyone here a fighterpilot or fired any sort of missile IRL? Amazing how some come out with some facts, but have never even been near aircraft let alone talk about them. Seems that if anyone suggests anything here there are always a few people insulting or flaming others for no reason. GJ Your Flight Degrees are waiting at the door. :thumbup:

Im kinda confused, Pilotasso we flew a few nights ago together and we had this dicussion and when i said removal of aim120 is a good idea you agreed with it. Maybe i heard it wrong but seeing here you think otherwise. Tactics are all well and good, but how often does the russian side get awacs? And dude you cannot maddog the ET as effectively as the aim120. F-15 may be a very great plane, but giving the flanker a missile(s) that barely works shouldnt do that. Im all for upping the F-15's datalink capabilities and EWS. I in no way want to see the F-15 downgraded, but at the same time i dont like the fact that the flanker is. Peace

I think what this sim needs is its missiles changed in order to be more fun and competitive for all. You want to test metal of a pilot, put equal advantages to both. IMO remove aim120 or add the r-77 adder to the flanker series, reasons are as follows. 1.All SAR missiles fired by the flanker can be easily spoofed, easy ECM ON OFF 50 times and your precious ER payload is useless, people seem to program a macro function to their sticks just to do this.I kinda find it annoying knowing that the missiles i carry on my flanker are nothing more than rockets as soon as someone starts doing that. 2. What fun is it to get a whole payload of 8 amraams fired on you out of no where, when you cant reply back with a proper answer? Su27 Flanker can hold its own with an f15 in a 1v1 fight "at times", but in a multiple engagement situation the f15 outclasses it. 3.Isnt this for fun and competition amongst the community? I know many will argue that its not realistic or so on and so forth, but do you think this kind of realism is needed where it causes huge divides?(small thing like addition of a perfectly realistic missile put on a platform that might be able to support it) Flanker IMO has been castrated everystep of the way. So has the F15 in manyways. (G-forces are way to unrealistic and thus screws the f15 in a dogfight) What i would like to see is some sort of AR missile on the flanker, and advanced EWS system on the F15. I think this would be a very enjoyable solution. Well those are my 2 cents, think of it what you will, but i see great squad wars and competitions with these kinds of changes, implementations. Then again its my oppinion. :beer:

Hi all here is my new afterburner effect i just made today, will be soon downloadable. check it out http://img101.imageshack.us/img101/6797/screenshot001if1.jpg http://img433.imageshack.us/img433/528/screenshot016mh2.jpg http://img136.imageshack.us/img136/7484/screenshot013yx8.jpg i copied it off an fa18 i saw take off during wartime in the middle east

nice detail ice. first skin is awsome!

Hi Just wondering if this flare count is going to be fixed Blackshark for the su27/33 I just tested something and saw the flanker has 16 flares, while the f15 has 30 flares. This picture surely says the flares are more than that http://www.patricksaviation.com/uploads/av_images/med/1793.jpg

Very nice screenshots, now fly over a city and paste your fps back here.

Well id like to believe there is some redtape involving that issue, but then the next question is, if there was how come they came out with FC and now BS? Since clearly these 2 expansions or addons require you to tamper with the code. Furthermore to kungfuguy Voicing an oppinion is not crying, seems to me from your comment that you are more concerned about -AS-'s feelings rather than the game. TOUCHÉ This still doesnt validate the massive screw up on ED's part.

Hi ED My squad and i have noticed a big bug with the HSI. When in any other mode the HSI does not give a correct reading, so every time to get a correct heading we have to switch to nav mode, which makes it very very hard to do so when u are locked on to a target and plotting your position according to bullseye. Im hoping this is fixed asap thanks.

Ill get it once SF is not used on it. I dont want 3rd party crap on my computer that u cant even remove. ED shoulda thought of this before... IMO bad move on the SF protection and worse move on the activations 5 times thing... You dont get anything Solid and u pay 35 bucks for it.. Bs dont need it.