RvEFuSiOn

Is this the same Model as the other F-15 model by Gys? If so what are the changes? Thx

Dude common mistake its the Su-39 you mean, not 30. Peace

Flying the plane at 132ktas@SL? Which test pilot will do that?

Actually i have participated in 3-4 Red flag events Hajduk ;-) Ive been around in this community when there was a very small community since the Flanker 2.51 days. I'm fully aware of what takes place, but I've come to a realization that most people are egomaniacs in this community and cant be helped. Every suggestion is used to attack the person suggesting change/compromise. People read what they want to read and understand what they want to understand. So on that note i say good luck.

Thx for confirming what i already knew about this community ;-) M*r*ns! Goodluck

If you are using the same code for the aim120c and the r77 in lockon then realism doesn't matter does it?

What im curious to know is why is everyone trying to "simulate" realism in a game when everyone treats it as a game. It has a FEW realistic factors in it, but a lot of factors pertinent to war are not there and or are missing. You want realism in war time scenario, even a pinch of it.... Fly falcon. What you can hope to do is try to simulate realistic aspects of combat by introducing those conditions in FC2, currently the entire Lockon series plays like an arcade game (Air quake), hence mission developers and server hosts can only hope to overcome this by adding conditions so that their clients/players conform to their "idea" of realistic In any war scenario, the first objective is to take down the enemy Air defense network and radar stations, how often do you see this in any game in lockon? If so... how much priority is it really given? Nil or next to nil... Its all just one gigantic never ending air war to bolster individual pilot/squad egos with an end result being a stale mate, and after a while players get demotivated to fly the same thing over and over due to repetitiveness. There is no mentality of team work, where one side competes vigorously and tactically to out do the other side. God help any of you if you think war is conducted anywhere near how its done in Lockon. eg. If you have been eating rice all your life, you wont know what bread tastes like ;-) ^ Some will get that some wont, to those who get it, apply it, be creative in your mission making! Peace

In case you haven't noticed it GG, most Russian pilots are not happy with the flanker, its not just a few.

@aaron886 I'm sorry but i don't see his point.... Fact is if the flanker wasn't built to be an air superiority fighter, then why would china have the biggest fleet? Fact is that they are both tremendous aircraft... and another fact is that F-15's have always met aircraft in the sky that were at least 1-2 generations behind it and not to mention poorly trained pilots, hence you have such a high K/D ratio on the F-15. Now that doesn't take away from its capabilities as an aircraft, but you can't in the same stroke say one is better than the other. As it stands in FC2, the Eagle completely outclasses the Flankers. I fly the Eagle its great and I'm giving and unbiased opinion, but in the interest of fairness and allowing people on both sides to enjoy the game, our =RvE= server will allow the r77 adder on the su27 for the flanker drivers. Yes i know the su27sk carries it, but since the cockpit is the same and its just an avionics upgrade we are allowing it. Again whole point of us all to be a part of this community is to enjoy the time we spend here, and if some of our brethren who fly other aircraft are not enjoying it, we should maybe cater to their needs, so that their experience is better. Edit: one thing that would save a lot of this controversy is if ED just decides to add china to the game with access to the su27sk. Problem solved. Peace!

This line you posted up there tells everyone how much you know actually about aircraft and what they are built for, let alone their performances... I need not say any more.

But what is wrong with this YoYo? Real Pilots have to manage their G forces, they cant pull for ever :-) All this will do is get online pilots to manage their G forces better, instead of pulling non stop at High G's. It will take more throttle management too, instead of yanking the stick back full with full afterburner.

Yeah, well before you GLOC you can pull 13-14G's for a split second on an instantaneous turn, it all comes down to pilot skill when you have the ACS limiter off.... Which is how its supposed to be.... F15 IIRC doesn't have a limiter.Currently with it on it feels like a simplified flight model which doesn't require much skill to dogfight in. You don't have to turn off any GLOC failure.... Any chance this will be done in the next patch?

thx!

YoYo i did some testing, With ACS failure on, the aircraft all feel much more realistic, try it and see what i mean. If ACS limiter is taken off, all that someone would have to do is adjust their curve settings on the pitch axis other than that, all AC fly great. When you pull hard with the ACS Failure on, you can feel the immense drag on the jet, which is excellent otherwise you don't feel this... IMO this should be removed in all jets, that would fix a lot of issues too that we feel with excessive thrust and all that...

how about we do 1v1 GG, you in the Su27 me in f15, 20 fights. If you win 1 Fight I will agree with you that the flanker is fine ;-) If you do not accept, then those are empty words with nothing to back up. F15 can toy with the flankers in this game.

Hey guys i was wondering have the A/C failures been removed in this new version of FC, and if so is there any way to enable them?

Are these sustained turn rates or instantaneous turn rates in your last graph YoYo? edit: nm they look like sustained turn rates, Ps. If possible could you also please give us the instantaneous turn rate values please and the G values if not too much trouble on both graphs. Thx!

this bug has been already mentioned to the ED guys, they haven't implemented flaps properly in this game, the drag factor is almost not there with flaps down.

Explain pls i didn't understand.... Btw i was flying at about 4200ft ASL

I was kinda low but! when i died it said SA-11 hit me... and if a bird strike had hit me shouldn't I have lost my systems and have to bail out? when this happened to me as you can see i just got vaporized and back to A/C selection screen. Thx for reply!

Hey guys recently i was flying on the 104th server, and had a major bug take place! On the way back rtb i was flying feet wet, well away from sam coverage, when suddenly boom i got hit by a SA-11, no warning, nothing. I watched the track in tacview and the track in game, nothing hit me, and i have proof of it! In fact nothing launched, i was outside launch parameters! here are 2 screen shots, taken 8 seconds apart on Tacview. (before and after i exploded) Before: After: As you can clearly see, nothing hit me yet i spontaneously exploded. This is the second time that this has happened, and i can now confirm that I'm not losing my mind :-) Again i had full knowledge of where the Sams were, and had flown this mission a lot for the past few days, I knew not to come anywhere near the coast line. And i had taken no damage prior to my spontaneous explosion. I'm looking for some answers please, as i don't like losing airframes when I'm not at fault. Peace & Have a good one ;-)

Here is how my game looks with these kind of settings This is a very realistic setting, you have to see it to believe it

Obviously they are going to say its good... lol... they want congress to support the aircraft program, and once congress realise how much is being spent on this and what the flaws are of the program, they will most likely make serious cut backs on it or cancel it all together. Ever heard of the navy saying one of its planes sucks? (When in all fact the superhornet is known as the Lemon of the navy) doesnt happen that way.... Washington post hit on alot of points that troubles the USAF and this in turn will piss off congress. Lets watch the show and see how it turns out. My bet is they probably will scrap the f22 program for something more cost effective. I guess thats where the JSF comes in to play.

Here is something interesting you guys should read For all the people that thought the f22 was invincible, think again. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/07/09/AR2009070903020.html all i gotta say is lol what a waste of money:music_whistling:

mehhh thats why i dont fly lockon... it blows no matter how its sugar coated. Falcon all the way