59th_LeFty

As I remember, it does not make any sense... Our migs were re-painted too, and the nose is now closer to white, than black :) The black nose will not make your day...

Sorry for 'reopening' an argue which has been closed before, let's close it again. :) All the things you've sad is right, I only had the problems with the "feeding" that BS will be lomac addon and with many new LOMAC features, which we'll lack after all:( Anyway, do we have ANY info about when DCS is about to released, or a demo?

You're next :) Type 508 V-tail prototype of the scimitar.

Supermarine is correct, but has no link to the attacker, nor the Sea Hawk :)

No, and no :) However, quite good point on the similarities to the bucaneer!

'Ending' the LockOn series pissed me off so much that - right now - I wouldn't even pay for the full version either.

Errr... would be better to have an "is there XY 3D modell available" topic, but I didn't find it, so please forgive me for taking the question here, I don't want to open a new one again.. So what I need is an F-22 modell, is there any?

Finally I found something, take that one:

Torwak, you're straight in the middle! It CAN'T :D It's just so ugly, that Earth repels it.

Beriev Be-[dunnowhat] Bartini's or whatever the name is. Type VVA-14

Don't abandon this cool thread :) Take this one: (BTW, I still dunno the exact type yet :D ) http://www.aranysas.hu/images/backgrounds/200804/080402.jpg

War is an ungly thing. Military aviation is good only while it is a "Big game". Damn, I remember that moment, when I just walked the street as a young kid, put my eyes on the sky, and those formations were like moving stars. MANY, MANY stars. I'll never forget it. Patroling F-15s over my head, 30k feet high, Falcons hanging around the tankers, well, ther were 'some' activity in the air in those times :)

That's right. In the case of the meteor there is an integrated booster.

Nonono. Now DO NOT say me, these thing ARE possible, and ED did not implement any of 'em, or I'll scream. :) So if I clearly understood it, we'll have randomised unit (including planes) placement, random unit qualities? What about events or triggers? is it possible to implement such toys?

I've searched the whole internet for this thing, and found NOTHING :D I've tried to use the Hawker Hunter while search such as the Harrier, and other 'like' missiles, but nope. It could be a training version of a missile, e.g. Firestreak. I give up :)

By the way, are you sure that the first missiles are the same as the two others? (pylons are different and the seaker also looks different)

This would be the "Red hawk" missile? (forefather of the Firestreak)

Hi! To avoid confusions, this is now called Su-35BM, and its far more advanced than it was. 21kW high performance man.steered-PESA combo radar (Irbis-E) with 240° FOV (yes, two-four-zero) and latest IRST (OLS-35; 180°FOV) and with glass cockpit, and other funny things. It is sad it can detect "stealth" airframe up to 40kms range (be my guest) and has some RCS downgrade. New, AL-31F based, "117S" engine, heavier than the original ones, and have 4000 flight hours. The aircraft has 11,5 max fuel capability, and can reach 3600kms.

I think this is a major problem in LO modelling, because you have to choose between "reality" and fairplay. I mean, if programmers concentrate on realism, they must ensure that two technologies from the past and the present do not meet. If we have Aim-9X, let's have OEPRNK-30, or ramjet R-77Ts, RVV-AE-PD... You know what I mean. In the case of fairplay, some technologies (like APG-63 in present LockOn) have to be undermodelled due to their Russian counterparts' lacks. I always wondered, which one of these ideas ED is following (followED :) )

Hi! And which one of the 34592837452 topics? Sorry.

And thanks for the effort! ____________ Some notices, I need to confirm they should be fixed. -Flaps out in low speed then accelerating Mach1.5, flaps still extended (liked that in FORTIS CUP :P ) -is it really that hard to make some smoke for the engines? -discussed somewhere before, but anyway the Flanker's speed idicatiors work (IAS, TAS indication 'problems') IRL, my opinion is let it be similar. This is a simulator. -if possible, working/moving navigation instruments (ARK) while in other mode (BB, SLEM, etc.) -still need that AFM for UAZ...

cool_t! Say it like that: "You sure you want to say that, buddy?:spam_laser:"

*---FixTV Proud to present---* A cute video footage from the FORTIS up Enjoy!

Congratulations for RvE! Two times winner of this great event! All participants were tough, and fair. Thank you for taking part in the Dogfightcup! I hope we'll see you guys next year! Cheers!

If we talk about N-019 (referred to E) it's an absolutely NEGATIVE. And except that E (export) version is degraded e.g. for IFF, I don't think it's upgraded in this case.