supraman2turbo

That's a really good idea. I'm gonna start doing that

Yes please!

Yeah a couple squadmates and myself would love to be able to adjust the trim curve. the trim seems too coarse as a squadmate put it perfectly

Okay someone needs to describe the awesomeness of the CBU-97s, how many tanks did they get with 1 cbu-97?!?!

RIP Steve Jobs. The man changed the world a few times over. If you have something against him think of this, whatever device you are using to bash him on the forum, thank him for that device, it was Woz and Jobs's idea.

If you use the TAD method if something is in the way of the triangle. I think (haven't tested this but see the potential) you can use the off profile to clear the clutter.

I found the training in A-10C to be one of the best I ever encountered in a flight sim. After doing them I had a really good idea about how to use the aircraft, now with the 51st they train in the finer points of the A-10 but the basically are taught very well by the training missions. while on the other hand Black Shark's training is pretty much useless for me (sorry Wags)

Me love you long time for some info?

Well I will toss in the response they gave me "It will be done when it is done" which made me sad

What I was really trying to suggest is the Nevada map that the map lends itself rather well to the current DCS and the next DCS.

The Nevada map actually makes the most sense. Hear me out. The next DCS is going to be a US Fighter, that much is confirmed. It makes more sense to release a Red Flag terrain due to the fact that both DCS jets are American. So you can have Red and Blue forces both flying American craft where it makes sense to do so. Yeah it leaves the black shark as the odd ball out but the shark is also the only DCS Helo. If DCS is going in the direction that I think they are. Once they get get an american helo and at least 1 foreign fighter it would make sense to then make a map where it would make sense to have the opfor be from a different country.

I understand Lord EtherealN. All Hail Lord EtherealN

You are so ruining my joke....so harsh to the noobie

Using a holiday of peace for a toy for a game about war....I like it.

Okay fine we can do a eurocopter tiger, I'm cool with that

Came from wikipedia. It is my understanding the B, B+, C were planned but cancelled in favor of just using the A and D. And I didn't know that, well that sucks, I would love a DCS Apache or Longbow module. I wasted my youth playing the JCS Longbow 1 and 2

I said it that way to suggest making the D without the radar since I figured that'd be the still really classified part of the Longbow

With the way the helmet visors are designed in the F-22 you'd think they'd just use that for the AH-64 pilot at least, the co-pilot would have a hard time with it unless the Head Down device was modified. Also since the AH-64D can't be done (prolly due to the radome). why not do the AH-64C/D which is a longbow without the radar. As for SP shamelessly steal the ideas used in JCS Longbow 1 and 2.

If you need help testing. I'm just saying I'm available :thumbup:

Understood. Didn't mean it that way meant it as I couldn't wait for it to come out to reign down death on columns of tanks

When is the patch coming out? I can't wait to play with the new CBU toy.

It has something to do with the Sidewinder missile, if you do the Air to Air training mission the instructor tells you what it is.

I was thinking the same thing. Wouldn't it have been better to keep the BLU-97s overpowered until the CBU-97 was modeled? So say next patch if the CBU-97s come out. Implement the new CBU-97s and in the same patch lower the power of the BLU-97s? I mean I love the game and all just seems that would have been a better route for the users. Still can't wait for the new CBU-97s to reign death on those dang T-72s

So which is it, a X52 or X52 Pro

Other way around the headset isn't working, just checked the speakers and they are working fine.