A.S

and you base your....erm projects ..on THAT? :huh: this is only an envelope ....

“Almost human intelligence” of Russia’s future fighter jet permalinke-mail story to a friendprint version Published 11 February, 2010, 17:39 Edited 11 February, 2010, 23:07 Russian top brass are overjoyed with the PAK FA, the Russian fifth generation fighter that made its maiden flight recently. The chief of general staff said the machine is so good it will have “almost human intelligence.” Yahoo StumbleUpon Google Live Technorati del.icio.us Digg Reddit Mixx Propeller General Nikolay Makarov was describing to journalists the advantages of the PAK FA over its opposite number in the US Air Force, the F-22 Raptor. The Russian model is expected to be much cheaper and superior in terms of cost-to-performance ratio. The senior officer did not elaborate on his mysterious comment, neither revealing a top secret military project for artificial intelligence nor saying that it was a metaphor to describe the aircraft’s advanced electronic equipment. Read more The Sukhoi PAK FA, also known as T-50, made its maiden flight on January 29 at the testing range near Komsomolsk-on-Amur. First deliveries of the aircraft to the Russian Air Force are expected between 2015 and 2017.

No, it is right written. I once only found it in usenext network. It is a really worthy documentation. FLIGHTPATH V | Future Fighter ( once in History Channel ) with Billie Flynn, canadian F-18 Pilot and Testpilot F-35, EF2000 and F-16 Block 60

thx everyone for commenting....it is getting interesting :thumbup: I really enjoy to hear various expiriences and opinions too in this matter.

its nice to read you guys ...but at "ditch a missile" you lost me... what does that mean?

Anisotropic Filtering: ingame ON ...in gfx-card application controled Renderng: only HAL not T&L & HAL should help.... but yes, for biger overviews (battles) tacview is visual more handy.

for correct telemetry and data you have to use ingame ACMI player the converted ones are screwed in that means.

Flighpath V Eurofighter is a very good one.

No i havent. This is free for discussion. Let see how creative this post moves along. PS: we did those curves waaay back in my RvE days.....

Now this is a more valueable feedback. But actually im really only refering to the characteristics, balistics, algorythms, speed-cuvres...chaff resistance....look-down characteristiscs...etc etc ...such things. You know many (who not) complains about lockon missiles...the russian dont like their ERs, the US guys dont like their 120ties ...for good reason. My post was actually just made to open that topic....HOW OTHER SIMS have solved that...what we (lockon) can learn from this? .....2.0 and more future is to come. My idea was to inspire a creative discussion.

Well, then all should be clear here.... What you think about the missiles ?

Have you EVER flown Falcon AF? No trash ... just responding your "strange" post. (Dont try to be a smart###, if you dont know what you speaking about. This post was only made as "general mission" comparsion, and i think we should stick to topic)

Talking about 1v1 guns. You know who you are talking with? :D No, the AI is really better by all means in AF. Even in gunso, but of course, trashing AI in gunso is boring. I doubt that you can trash even the Mig-29 on Ace in AF ...not to mention the EF2000...but thats another topic. As far for the campaigns...the AI operate amazingly smart and provide a really excellent battlefield expirience. But i cant explain you that, or i cant try to convince you from that....you have to feel it by yourself. Im an old lockon guy.....but anyone who came over to to AF, may it be for fun, and saw the depth and substance of it....was like "oh boy...no wonder, they lol at Lockon ers, this amazing...or ..each time i play this i discover more things.....or..crazy how they made the AI ..... << those are comments from old lockon fellows.

Well nothing then.... I think best would be, if you try it for yourself....and compare yourself...maybe that gives you ideas ..dunno. PS1: i had to set the AF AI on "dumb-dummy", cuz purpose was to show the missiles without being fought by AI and screwing up the demo. PS2: i gave the hint in first post (remarkable in both case is the range difference at Rmax, the speed characteristics of the 120Cs (LO and AF) ... tragectory "behaviour", aswell fusing ....)

U.S. Missiles http://www.scribd.com/doc/468212/US-Missiles

:) ... i played that hours back in days .....

then let me correct you kind. YOU ARE VERY WRONG !!! so much, that you dont even know what you talking about. This is a kind serious honest FACT from me to you. AF AI is by ALL MEANS way superior then LOs ..but again...this was not topic. I just posted this comparsion chance for all those of you, who never look further out from their beloved own "cages", but what doesnt suprise me, that instead of thinking about it, many turn even THIS to a "F-15 vs Su-27 whining" :D (just with AF vs LO) post. Me out.

link please.....wishing to watch other publications :book:

EXCELLENT !:thumbup:

gheey

The AI acts never the same and was set on rookie not ACE, and furthermore not topic of the comparsion. And the ER does have (you see it in another shot) but the reason why it crashed into the water, was my 120 went pitbull and forced AI to crank out of his own lock (..timings vs semi-actives ...) .. besides the missiles do have also "ground clutter", but if you look closly, the su-27 doesnt loose lock, till he breaks it..... There many more things to dig and to see in those "clips". Well, if you understand what you looking for first place of course. FROSTIE !! this was really not blowmac s### and AF rocks comparsion, this was just a comparsion to show how "they" modeled missiles. YOU know, all that what they are talking about in 2.0 and so on? Why each time you do good in this community you get an arrogant, ignorant and most non-intelligent feedback back? pfff

its selfexplantory http://lomac.strasoftware.com/tacview-en.php if you have no time....its bad...cuz it would take me aswell time to write it and for you to read it :smilewink:

www.as-private.com/DiffStuff/Aim120CvsAA10-AlamoC-inAF-DEMO.vhs.txt.acmi ..just for the sake of it....i made a AIM 120C vs AA10 Alamo C (R-27ER) demo tacview in Falcon AF. Mind you this is just a demo ....giving you a short comparison with lockon tacviews in same or similar situations. You are free to compare every detail you might think of importance....have fun ...2nd round i die puropsoly btw..... :D edit: here another comparsion in both cases 120Cs are fired at 15kft alt, eta 560 kts groundspeed.....once in AF, once in LO.... as soon as i hit Rmax in DLZ remarkable in both case is the range difference at Rmax, the speed characteristics of the 120Cs (LO and AF) ... tragectory "behaviour", aswell fusing .... http://www.as-private.com/DiffStuff/...ssile-TEST.rar

.

consequently ... speed/fuel