Ragnarok

Such the ultimate opinion too resembles the magic although practice did not provide confirmation. All assumptions, analysis, interpretation, information and military exercises are not the measure of reality. The only real war in the field is the only authoritative thing. All other admixtures containing of cheering. Of course, I respect anyone who knows and follows the theme, and tries to comprehend...

Question: Will you model jetwash to be able to feel aircraft rocking when behind and close to other taxing jet, and inflight to feel turbulence?

Substitute does not have a lot of, but this for example: (zip-tacview) R vs ER.rar

Спасибо всем за ваши усилия. В следующий раз мы сербы должны хорошие перевести брифинг. У нас не было четкого представления о задаче и графика. Удивил нами расписание синего ПВО. Ми-8 пилоты, извините, но у вас не было никакой защиты!

x2 Su27 (=4c=Ragnarok[sA] & 238.lbaeFalcon)

Thanks. I trust in the progres steps of physics simulation, regardless of the in passing problems.

The phenomenon occurs with the last patch. When the goal is to maneuver with + 7G, speed R-27ER less than 2700KM / h, the distance of 600m or less, missile not intercepts the target is already moving in a straight line as unguided rockets. Proximity fuse of 11m is insufficient to cover the distance of several hundred meters from the target. All this AIM -... working on a much smaller distance, where proximity fuse covers this phenomenon in the final. I enclose tacview + two images before and after a troubled moment. I think the smaller the DLZ at an altitude dealt with this problematic way. Instead of the full overtaking, happens half overtaking with premature abandonment, at speeds of less than 2700km/h, on a target maneuver with +7G. I hope that I was who understood what I wanted to say... problem with ER.rar

Nice video Maestro. Very good!

Absolutely. Thank you! :thumbup:

Guys if someone tried to fly stable backstroke like in this picture?

I try to see the flight phase with the available energy for each missile particularly in separate conditions. Therefore, any change in trajectory, even without changes in aerodynamics, a lot of change concept in the fight. I do not care which the missile is better, but I must to know their value in same conditions. Please, test the loft trajectory, and whether there are changes, and whether it is compensated a decrease in resistance with a particular AoA to achieve r_max?!

@GGTharos with last patch, not only corrected ER, but also AIM-120? Range for ER is 65.5km and this is perfect, but it seems to me that the trajectory for АИМ120 is lowered to a height altitude, quickly passing distance with higher energy expenditure. Especially at more than 33000ft altitude. What this is about? tacview ER vs AIM.rar

HOJ not calculated velocity vector, but it does not work most of the older IC missiles. Not to bore with explanation from me, you can find how it works "the system with three mirrors" in IC (GSN detector or principle of Cassegrin telescope). My translate serbian-english document (imprecisely) 1. aerodynamic cap 2. formwork 3. The magnetic mirror 4. The secondary mirror 5. corrective lens 6-mesh filter (modulating disk) 7. The photo-resistor

Question: - How to transfer AIM-120 texture from "High visibRange" into "low visibRange"?

When you lose a fight on the server, you lose your license and you get a blue screen on the computer? :lol: It would be interesting to see how the pilots flying and fight :music_whistling::megalol:

to cut a long story Tacview - R-3 vs R-27R Therefore, G limit is a different story but here is the kinetic advantage of R-3!

In fact, the practice has shown that the R-60 much more reliable than R-3. Overcoming missile attack from R-3 was the rule, and almost always entered in opposite passage and classic dogfight. I have the impression that you have not tried to test these two missiles.

Question! Do you think that is too strong R-3? In relation to the R-27R is significantly better. Is it this normal? R-3 with one mach to more than R-27R? :(

After thousands of topics which were discussed at the forum more than the Pentagon and the Kremlin together, I have to read this post :doh:

I think it is not working so it is compared with something. Background Doppler is there only to be rejected by the computer, and not to be compared with the aim of flying. At high altitude have no background effect. Lock on then it is stable. If I understand you correctly... Only the receiver records the Doppler effect, so it is important that the speed of the receiver (the receiver is SARH)

By the way, it occurs to me something. If the fins on the R-27 consume more electric power bills of fins on the AIM-120, maybe this is why it is impractical to R-27 to be ARH. Heavy missile with enormous speed requires big fins that consume a lot of electricity. With this has only low power consumption for the receive only. Radar would be an additional problem. I do not know, maybe I missed... :(

It's true. Although the receiver SARH depends on the speed rapprochement. Huhh, these are really sensitive matters. What is really impressive is the battery for the radar to ARH. Passive receiver to SARH is quite relaxed. The battery is charged during flight, but was consumed quickly. The biggest spending goes to electric motors for the fins, but no radar is not frugal. Cost-programmed flight ARH, in the inertial phase, saves power for an electric motors for the fins, which is not the case with SARH, maybe this is the reason. Although, I do not know how to power supply so weakened by saving the SARHs receiver, if SARH still agile... :(

You must understand, forum is a good place to learn a lot, but the best knowledge is not gift. The best knowledge is stealing. If I see that you listen to me more than himself, I'll tell you all wrong, and I will kill you! :D Joke

Sneaking is well on the server that fly unorganized individuals. That's why you have success. Against organized squadron when flying high, you have no chance for either kill. Sneaking is like "fishing in troubled waters". Often you're lucky, but always you have less solution. Superior fight is when you have a lot of solutions, as high fight. When you're high, you have a 1vs.5, consider that this fight 1vs.1 with the primary target. The only difference is that the attack must to last quick, but when you're high and that's enough. If you want to detain as when sneaking, it can not.

You're wrong. Every situation has its implementation. None of tactic is not good enough, because sooner or later enemy knows to adapt. It is important to frequently changed tactics and recognize the situation, and then select the maneuver. This would not be interesting if there were perfect recipe. For your every maneuver, anyone can say "yes, but...". The best tactic is to know all the laws of the game. Your notch is just one of them. Note! Notch is the real thing, but in reality, head 2 head and one 2 one is an extremely rare situation. Therefore, solving your problem is not too important, but it is useful to know as a basic rule!