greco.bernardi

Will be nice to have a full module, but i still not understand why ED is developing first as a full module (mossie, C47 or anything else)....if IA one can be fast introduced in DCS World and after that could be completed to full module. I think that is not only a of parachutes animations that is need to built. ED will need to built a proper dynamics to parachutes that is lacking now as you can see in SU25 or SU27 today. Another lacking dynamics that still necessary to built is water interation with boats, ships and airplanes... But its needs another tread!

Thanks @xvii-Dietrichand @philstyle for the reply. I didn´t read the reports in Storm of War. I will be more carefull to find it and read it in future. Thanks for all explanation. See you in SOW skies.

Microprose was the better developer and the 1942 Pacific Air War Gold was my favorite one. Chuck Yeagers was only one of many air combat simulators that i had in ´80s and ´90s.

@philstyle, thanks for make a place (SOW) that a WW2 comunity can enjoy together. Don´t let me wrong... I had hours of fun in Normandy map, but some times i think that Normandy map do a limited time frame and place for a diferent missions types. Are you never think about change the server map to the The Channel map? In Normandy map every body are too close (allies and axis airbases). Its almost impossible to axis planes to operate near the coast line by Navy fire and almost every body goes to fly too low near Caen in a furball. The pros could be that Normandy have a better FPS than a The Channel. I don´t know if when The Channel map come to finish state this month something will change. I think that in the Channel map we could have some pre invasions mission with axis force atacking England targets/convoys or could allies atacking occupied France targets in the cross channels operations. Also we can have some pos invasion missions types with ground combat and operations in france like we have now in normandy, but with a possibilte of allies and axis airbases not operate too close. Allies in this case can operating in france and in cross channel bases from England, but with a better front line.( Allies at West and axis East in France) I don´t know if it is historical correct, and if they had air bases, axis and allies, operating in this part of France from august to setember of 1944. It´s only a question/suggestion. And thank you again for the nice server.

Look like will be the Dakota C47, she talks about transport and parachutes.

Italy 1943/44

Hi Petro! Welcome, We that played the old simulators like Chuck Yeager´s air combat, Aces of europe (sierra) or microprose 1942 pacif air war (I still have the box) have here a very nice place to fly. the VR headset changes all thing... turn this simulator in another world! With a high level of immersion... I have one and hard recommend! If you try a VR you will never fly again without one... And if you can, a ruder pedal is nice too.

You are right... You are confused. DCS is a digital COMBAT simulator. Sorry by the joke. I think this is not about a favorite aircraft. Its more about AI planes and some another things that still missing and without information for long time. By the way, Its very nice to have the Mossie as module.

I know about it and i´m very gratefull to ED for that. When i participated in kickstart WW2 project and after the developer get out, i´m not afraid to lost the money....I´m afraid to lost a passion/hobby. In that time... The old il2 dev.( Oleg Maddox) did close the doors one year before trying to do the new il2 Storm of War (i paid for it in pre-order). Sadly that sim bird dead (without future development). When WW2 project start the crownfound campain it was a hope for WW2 warbirds lovers and when it gone be wrong and ED got to finished what they didn´t start... And without any obligation to do that... It was fantastic! Because it was a better chance to have a great WW2 Sim and future for my hobby. In that time as now, i don´t have problem if ED did can not give me for free anything as a kickstart backers. I would buy all modules and would be happy to have a great Sim developer building a WW2 combat simulator. Why i saying this? You are right about that will be worth the wait...The problem is how many time. If anyone in comunity knows what is in development and what is in wait, it's looking like nothing is in working! I know that is not true... but for someone that bought a WW2 module in early access and still wainting for a simple bug fix for years is difuculty to understand. When to JU88 drop a bomb demand a lot of time...start to be litle frustating for the comunity. I supose that should be fixed by a good comunication... I know that talk too early about something can be a problem here, but don´t talk anything can be also a problem. Again... i love this sim!

almost 8 year ago 4 years ago ... before this we can fly in caucasus map... ...10 years ago i bought a A10 in beta access when DCS World does not exit yet! A10 was a stand alone sim and i will receive the Nevada map as regard when be doned. I flew the mutang in caucasus map when we didn´t have any another place or WW2 axis plane to fight. In my opnion after 8 years we have less AI planes than is needed to do a rich enviroment... And when i said "rich enviroment" its about do diferent missions types...scorting or engaging diferent bomber or fighters types. Now we have only the JU88 (recently with bombs too), a B17 and a A20 as AI bombers. Don´t let me wrong... We have now a better enviroment than before, but...Is its enought? I know that ED don´t like to talk about plans or timeline.I know why...and i can understand that talk about release dates can be a problem but turn a lack of infomation a company policy looks weird. But again, I´m not trynig to blame anyone. It´s only my personal opnion.

I fully agree!

I´m not talking about me..I´m still here ...and flying in SOW server all time. I have almost all WW2 modules and a lot of modern airplanes, but i love the ww2 warbirds and dedicate my time flying them in DCS. The true is that WW2 modules need a great set of AI assets on ground, sea and air to permit us to fly and flight in a great enviroment. I don´t know why mosquito comes like a module before we have it as AI plane? And why we saw a lot of pictures of anothers AI ww2 planes years ago like dacota and still not present in the DCS world today. I have seen some people that loves ED´s WW2 birds talking about close your ww2 server or that will not add the mosquito in it by the lack of progress in bug clean of some warbird. It´s not good for the WW2 DCS comunity when some consumers feels in this way. I think the ED can do a better comunication of yours plans and timeline. As we have now looks weird. Anyone know what is planned and what the DCS WW2 future. Anyone here know what WW2 module will be done after Mosquito?

Sorry i´m not trying to do weirds comparations....I know that time is necessery to recreate a warbird. And you are right! Almost all planned ww2 modules was built except by the ME262 and we don´t know if still planned. The most importing thing that still remaning to be completed is the AI planeset. Sometime ago ED talked about to do a 109G and 190F as a module and i will love to buy all of them, but i´m afraid of us will be a long waiting...too much. I thing the discution is about what ED still planning to do and if they can show us the timeline. Any infomation is better than what we have now. It will be necessary a decade? Ok... but for what? The worst thing is the lack of information. I prefer to know what ED is planning before buy another ww2 module like the mosquito. I don´t know if the slow progress is about few dozen people working. And again... don´t let me wrong! I love ED´s ww2 warbirds, but if the development still slow and without infomation like now... Many people will lost interest. I just want to undestand why the progress is too slow.

Dont let me wrong.... i´m a WW2 silver backer and i happy to receive my regards from ED. I´m not trying to blame ED or anyone, but its impossible to not think that are something wrong with the slow progress of WW2 modules and AI airplanes assets. Years of slow progress... I´m afraid of dying before see all assets and planes completed as planned. And it is sad! I´m not tryng to blame ED by kickstart faults and i know that ED was not respossible to complete what was promised by another one. In real life in the World War 2, a lot of planes and variants was built in less time than here in this virtual WW2 "DCS World"...about only 4 year in real life. How many time still needed to finish this limited set of airplanes? Should it anyone from ED´s staff can say what is still planned to be done and show us the timeline? Sorry if some words looks weird or wrong ...english is not my mother language.

I would like to have a G model to fly...A iconic plane like a G6 would be too fun! I didn´t like to fly the K4 model and 1945´s maps in old il2...F and G variants was almost all time my preference...and in SOW i ever prefer to take a 109 without MW50. BUT! What is the most correct G variant´s choice?

@NineLine You should confirm that is normal to have too few control range when on 300km/h?

Good to know about a plan for a pre D-day. I understand...6 hours of fuel its a lot. Thanks!

It´s possible to have a pre D day mission or a D day mission? When Allies don´t have airfields on France yet. And Its possible to remove the amount fuel option to all players...i don´t think is realistic that someone can takeoff with less than 100% of fuel.

I prefer the white dots too... It´s not a perfect solution but now i can´t spot anything in my VR.

Its almost impossible to flight with this high limiter control under on low speed. I can only press full rudder or pull and push the stick on full range under 200km/h after 300km/h the 109 pilot have no possibility to use the stick or rudder on full range and have lost great of control range. After 400km/h you lost almost all range.... Why 109 have this high limiter.. I cant see anything like that in my Spit? I dont did the same test with my P51, p47 or FW190D but.... Its will be as is now or its a WIP effect thing that will be tuned soon and it will be implented in another planes.

I don´t know if its possible, but if we can have a dot color like a mix of the colors of plane camouflage it will looks great. We will have a functional camouflage on planes on great distance and correct color to another vehicles and navy objects. Now we have in the liveries the texture map of warbird, numbers maps and a description text file. If we can have a dot color map too in the liveries, we will have a correct color for each camouflage and not a generic color for all. Would that be possible?

Thanks Nineline for the feedback! Merry christmas and happy new year!

I have problem with a VR... I only can see a plane if it is on close distance. I fly all time on SOW server and now i can´t see a big objects like ships! I need to be over coast line to see a ship..how can i see a little plane? Its good to know that its working to someone. I hope that ED make something to keep working for VR users Too.

Sorry, Its feels like a temporal loop Its now hard to see anything in a VR again. I dont know what is the betther solution but now is not fun to fly again with ww2 warbirds in DCS. I Fly all time with WW2 planes in Storm of War server and If you can't see a ship before be almost on coast line ... how can i see a plane? I know that the white dots have inverse problem...you can see everyone on great distance but now... Feels like a problem with a view object cliping parameters, because the ships disaper on few distance. I have a oculus rift cv1 using 1.4 PD...a GTX 1080 and a lot of ram.

Now its the awfull plane that i ever fly!