ericoh

How do you activate the ELINT pod?

Awesome! Also i will add Vikhr station, i know it is unreal but damn it the su-30 is so cool. Thanks

I cant seem to get the TV weapons to taget via the optical system. Any ideas?

AHA! Finaly! Thanks so much! It would be so damn cool if the Anti-Radiation weapons work! P.S.: Filedropper link is working fine for me.

Is that realy where your imagination ends allready? :huh: Trust me theres people out there more suited for that job. You dont need to be scared that it becomes square land.

Let belsimtek look at it and decide if they wanna do something bout it or not. but realy.... some here are biased like hell.... Man let people nitpick if they like. you think men made it to space cause they said "ahh **** it its fine like that". i doubt...

True, however. Everyone shouts for more realism more more more. i doubt a real a-10's stick is as softy as a x-52. I am almost temptet to say "Deal with it" :D

The HOTAS is not that stiff.... It is exagerated, some people sound like you would need a ton of force to move it lol. I disagree that a 25$ stick does the same... But i agree that for example a X-52 does the same, however it feels less real. Decision decisions. P.S.: I tryed my HOTAS in BF3 out of curiosity, you can forget that. You cannot move the stick fast enought due to weight to compete with all the kids flying with a mouse hahaha...

Why do so much simmers have to be automaticaly boring? :huh: This is why people think about fat boring old men when they hear we play simmulation lol. :doh: BIGNEWY and OGREMAN are right, why not create a fictional terrain with everything inside. you can still call your enemy russia if that makes you hot...

I did not say it is wrong at all, infact i agree with you, hitting might be strong word lol

Okay, everyone i know would say you totaly overdo it. To be honest. I find this awesome lol! Now i would not hit on Belsimtek for that but i love the attention to detail some people in this community have!

!!!!! Awesome!

I know that alot of tradicionalists are looking back with wet eyes on this. I do not think you need to spend alot time in a simulation where you can simply start of in the air to get a feel for a plane and to realise that it is inferior. I got myself some payware because i thought maybe i will get prooven wrong and win a new sim experience... But your oppinion is set anyway. :smilewink:

I like that idea. But that would be very much work.

Yes right! But Nevada is coming, do not vote for even more sand :(

This.

Is Nevada Jungle? :huh:

I 2nd that, while i had 130FPS on high settings a few versions back i cant play fluid anymore nowadays, it is starting to piss me off.

I just fired it up again, it is terrible, everything is bugged haha, you cant even just fire it up and play.

Cool thanks, im gonna give 1 a shot. I can only hope the 3rd partys proove me wrong :thumbup: P.S.: Not VRS after they booted out the poor russian guy who had fun on his pc lol

Thanks for clearing some of the things up. For sure there is people that want to have very long flights. I only belive ED should invest in ground details because we mostly have Dedicated Ground Attackers (SU-25T, A-10C, KA-50 + UH-1H now). Argh i would pay alot of money to finaly get Nevada and see what it brings lol.

Edit: I see you allready consider people stupid when they ask questions, I guess everybody is an expert in the internet ;-) Where exactly did i claim every 3rd party plane does so? You better get the context clear. Thats just my opinion, of course Greetings P.S.: Can anyone tell me about a FSX fast mover with a good flight model? A PM is welcome.

Yes please support Occulus, it could be a game changer

Do they not only look good but also fly like a plane not like HAWX? Cause thats what keeps me away from FSX the "on-rails" flight dynamics.

I have it too and i never understood why all these people and 3rd partys keep modifying and and playing it, it realy is a piece of..... :joystick: