Jump to content

ericoh

Members
  • Posts

    732
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by ericoh

  1. Is he set to tasking Tanker?
  2. RIP.
  3. HAH! Man thats awesome, just tested it and can confirm it works! Thanks alot! Rep'd you.
  4. What a load of bullshit, these ridiculous politics and their wanna be shows of force.
  5. Unfortunately not alot to learn on sabre and dora, only refine. :D
  6. I am not sure if i understand you right. You changed the settings and now you lag? Cant you change them back? What exactly is the problem? MAybe you could post your settings?
  7. Yes, you can lock onto targets with the shkval electro optical seeker and then engage them with the cannon. P.S.: The cannon is mounted on the right side. To be taken into consideration when maneuvering. ^^
  8. Ka-50 is a beautiful attack platform. Give the systems a shot, great fun.
  9. OH MY! Information! Thanks.
  10. Bump for acknowledgement and/or fix!!! Please belsimtek?
  11. Looking good. just a headsup, you might wanna make those pictures a little smaller for the forum, theyre gigantonormous for a display. :D EDIT: Hm works now, seems like some kinda glitch... Before they all loaded full size for me.
  12. Thats interesting and good to know. Was there ever a word on multi core support with EDGE?
  13. Jet Trainer and Light-Ground attack roles. According to wikipedia. I wouldve thought exactly that aswell. EDIT: To late. :D
  14. Did some quick tests. I understand what you mean. It seems like the objects tend to be bigger pixels BUT after a certain distance they dissapear compared to higher resolution. 1680x1050 1280x800 No higher resolution here. Pardon the small editing inaccuracys, i did this in gimp on my none editing machine (half heart attack, gimp is horrible.) I think it illustrates the problem tho. 1680x1050 is 1 pixel blob. 1280x800 dissapeared at that point. Distance is 5.1 nm.
  15. At lower resolution objects tend to pop in later. Because there is no "small enought" pixel to render them earlier. Then you would need to start smart scaling, or it would be nothing-nothing-to close.
  16. Your own harrier. Damn, i need 1,5 mil$
  17. I think the firefighter realized the risk and the truck guy did just obey to the comand not to go for it yet. Also the refuel near desaster... man, the boom operater crapped his pants prolly, hahaha.
  18. Respect to the firefighter at the end. Looked like a classic case of test braking and corporate monkeys downplaying a real risk.
  19. Is it to high when you are at the ground? Are you Airborne when testing? Because the seat shifts down when you lift off and pull your gear in
  20. I'd assume that 2 meter long mock up target doesnt fly entirely straight, maybe thats why? EDIT: After watching several AA missiles track im not sure. Theres several systems with heavy movement. But patriot for example and s-300 seem extremly straight. Maybe IR missiles that follow??
  21. Im gonna highjack this thread instead of opening a new one. Afterall its a mi-8 question! :D Can you turn off the pilots in the mi-8? I didnt find the keys.
  22. This is my secret dream in a video. Arma 3 with DCS aircraft. ["YOUTUBE]RYI_5U6W4Ho[/YOUTUBE"] <-- without the Quotes " "
  23. We would need real numbers to assess how much more effective it would be. Theres afterall a big financial factor aswell. Maybe its just good enought like that and therfore rather built cheaper?
  24. I think the choppy movement is just the permanent correction of flightpaths to stay on top of the target. Is there anything more beautiful then a accelerating missile?:pilotfly:
×
×
  • Create New...