Hamilton

Yes sir, I set this mission with 3 threats, this occurred in the first threat (2 Mig 29s ahead), and you are right, due to the same speed, distance and aspect parameters, that I easily observed the difference of the missile(s) performance (accuracy) compared to the previous day flying the exact same mission.

Thanks for the answer guys. Sorry about the missing track/tacview, I flew the same F-16C mission I had flown before to test the update then I went out on a schedule and I´ll just come home on Wednesday.

Hi, I flew a F-16C mission today and the AIM-120 couldn´t hit the MIG-29 ( I fired three times), the strange thing is that I flew the exact same mission yesterday (before the update) and I didn't have this problem. I didn't read anything in the changelog about it, did anyone have this problem after today´s update? Thanks!

Hi, I just finished a mission there and had no problems.

Interesting ... So it's not the first time they use the practice of promising [WITHIN 90 days] and not fulfilling ...

YES! Exactly!!

I used CCIP (thought it would be easier but NOT :) ), thanks for sharing those missions Sedlo, I'm enjoying a lot! :thumbup:

Are you using CCIP or CCRP?

Same here with GBU-12 and CCIP, no problems with MKs (CCIP).

Exactly!!

Yess +1

Yes, and I confirm. I sent the email when I saw that the promised deadline had expired, then you answered the email I sent last month. I mentioned in my previous post that I didn't receive any email or message from virpil (on their own initiative) saying anything about the delay, even after I had already spent € 775.00 on their products.

Dear Cyph3r Ok, in the email quoted you said: "However these items are currently in production as we speak" Not true, several have already received the product and with the same date of pre order. "the 90 day timeframe is an estimate" Not true, my invoice stated clearly "Dispatched Within 90 Days" Within definition by dictionary.cambridge.org/us/: Inside or not beyond (a particular area, limit, or period of time)

Lucky you! My preorder was placed also on June 21st and nothing, not a single msg or email. VPC ACE-2 Rudder Pedals and VPC V.F.X Grip and in my invoice : [Dispatched Within 90 Days] Within definition by dictionary.cambridge.org/us/: Inside or not beyond (a particular area, limit, or period of time) Virpil certainly doesn't know this definition. I do not intend to buy anything more pre order with them, it is the second time they do not respect dates. :(

Thanks Don :thumbup:

Leaving Rift S always connected to the PC Dear friends, Do you think there is a problem leaving Rift S always connected to the PC (USB and Port, all the time), I mean, never disconnect after using your PC (and turned it off). Thanks!

+1 for the Shapeways too , I have it and I´s excellent! :thumbup:

Hello Sabre, I think they already fixed it , I´ve just finished this mission and I used the 28:32 inHg setting from the Mission briefing / Tower and had no problems. Thanks!

The problem of those Recon Stewart's videos is that he "cut" the video after "playtime is over" msg and goes directly to short final to land, then I can´t figure out the altitudes that he followed in the meantime. I edited my previous post above because now my question is only about the altitudes to keep in this mission, mainly from after takeoff until CP Bravo. Thanks!

Dear friends, Would someone please explain to me the correct altitudes to follow in this mission, mainly after takeoff until CP Bravo. After "Playtime is over" information, and after refueling to landing, I saw the page 12 (TAC17 Mission Data.pdf) it is FL060-070, but I´m not sure... Thanks!

Me too! :thumbup:

Thank you so much Shimmergloom667 :thumbup:

Yes indeed, among other things. :thumbup:

Same here, still the BEST in my opinion.

Thanks a lot for sharing, I´m an old timer but for the first time I´m using Easy Comm in DCS, also due VR, VA & Vaicom and I had exactly the same problem you said in your pdf. So, thanks again, it helped me a lot! Happy flying !!!