UCAS

According to Sky News last night.:lol::doh:

Would want to be in one of those against infantry with MGs let alone against AAA.

Hence why APEX was invented. http://www.keepandshare.com/doc/view.php?id=6373749&da=y

The super 40 barrel is the same length as the 30mm barrel and the round fits in the same belt as the 30mm, with the same maximum width and height. Only weight increases. perhaps something like 2 KCA revolver cannon with a combined 2700rpm and instant spool up would be better. They'd probably fire the same number of rounds in the first second of fire.

Super 40 - 40x180mm. Width and length compatible with 30x173mm. http://www.dtic.mil/ndia/2012armaments/Thursday14074reynolds.pdf

^Yep. The F-35 isn't entirely US either.

Unless you remove ground safety and use gun recoil.

I see your point, the chips are Israeli but arguably they could have been designed in several countries these days. My response was really to Invader. The most important technology in a supercomputer is the design which makes the 32,000 chips and 48,000 boards all run together. Kind of like how the most important technology in a chip is that which makes the billions of transistors run together. The microchip is only as important to a supercomputer as a transistor is to a microchip. Onward to quantum computers.

The tech is getting 10,000 chips to work together on a task. The tech of a supercomputer is not the tech of a single chip. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tianhe-2 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inspur

Not really. Let's think of a better example. The metal for the car was mined in Africa, so by your logic the car is African. All Volvo did was stick it together right? A standard OTS microchip is nothing special. Getting tens of thousands of them working in harmony is a bit more involved than simply gluing them together.

http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2013-06-10/infrastructure/39871911_1_top-500-list-tianhe-1-petaflops

Is there a command for this?

The Otobreda 127/64 and 127/54 system fire at twice that rate. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Otobreda_127/64 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Otobreda_127/54_Compact But the AK-130 is twin cannon setup, firing at a combined rate of up to 80rpm. http://www.navweaps.com/Weapons/WNRussian_51-70_ak130.htm It's like a machine-howitzer.:D The first cruise missile was the Kettering Bug: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kettering_Bug However the first modern cruise missile was the V-1. The Nazis also invented the first wire-controlled, TV-guided bombs and missiles and SAMs.

Totally agree. The aliens part is nonsense. It's just that when there are known, proven cases of politicians accepting money for political favours, and known proven cases of price-fixing, and known proven cases of amazing tax dodging, and known, proven unprosecuted cases of fraud in the banking sector, it baffles me when someone isn't just slightly disturbed by them all meeting in a room together. In all honesty, the alien aspect was probably put out there by the guilty parties so that everyone questioning their meet logically would be accompanied by 10 alien conspiracy theorists and lumped together with them. It's called 'poisoning the ink' - create a bigger, more ridiculous conspiracy to cover up a more logical one.

Thought so. 'Steering committee' eh? A career in politics surely awaits you. Not as easy as you think without leaving an electronic trace. Thatcher (on the way in and out). Clinton. Tony Blair. maybe they''re just running a private reality TV show to be called, "Politician Idol". You say it's 'quite normal' yet you fail to suggest a plausible reason why such a meeting could be taking place. You mention 'relevance'. Relevance to what? If they're not discussing 'co-operation' between competing businesses, political manipulation and pacts, why would it matter if a person was 'relevant'? The truth is that there really isn't anything in compliance with anti-competition laws and anti-corruption laws that they could all be doing in a room together that would make such a guest list and a 'steering group' necessary. It's like walking in on your wife to find her scantily clad in leather with a whip and a naked guy chained up with an apple in his mouth. You search for an innocent explanation but know deep down that there isn't one. Should any politician spend more time listening to political suggestions from less than 100 businessmen than the rest of the population in a democracy? Politicians aside, it's wrong for that many business heads to be meeting in the same room for the sake of cartel prevention. It's an offence to anti competition laws. If they're not discussing business and politics and vying for a run-around democratic decision making, what exactly do they meet for? So what pray tell are they meeting for in your little imaginary world? Chess? Must have been when they met Bush then. It's pretty much the same line of thinking. If you believe media, finance and political heads meeting together in private is a good thing, then you're probably naive enough to think corporations give money to political campaigns for a laugh. Such a nice man. It's great to have him shaping our future. The world's most powerful financiers, media barons and politicians meet in a room and you say the conspiracy is a theory?:doh:

Not in compliance with the rules but:

Evidence? Yes. Different people get invited every year, usually just before they become Prime Minister or President. The core group is still the same though. I believe one of the members - Henry Kissenger - is still wanted for war crimes. http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2002/11/the_latest_kissinger_outrage.html The idea that they simply meet for a tea party is highly humorous though. The tech CEOs once met Obama for a tea party, and a few years later PRISM. I guess you probably think political donations are made out of charity and sense of citizenship too huh? Glad you like them though bro'.

HiRes HiRes HiRes HiRes HiRes HiRes HiRes HiRes HiRes HiRes HiRes HiRes HiRes

Ummm no. Or a course in PRISM. The UFOs I'm not so sure about. Pretty sure plain old humans are to blame.

I played BF3 and the damage model was just too retarded to wrap my head around. I kept getting killed by people who were already dead twice-over by any reasonable verdict. Even hardcore was soft and vehicle damage just took the idiocy to another level. If by mature you mean '10', then I agree.

Also worth noting that when you have CM loaded, the top pipper dot is for API and the bottom is for HEI. Another interesting fact is that a HEI round contain roughly the same amount of explosive as an M2 or F1 hand grenade.

CM vs tanks (5 API + 1 HEI). HEI vs turd people (56 grams PBXN-5).