BabyJail

Gonna get it because I also own the P-51. Which together with the F-86 should make for some awesome missions if we get a korean map!

I have voted for the Re.2005 Sagittario! :lol:

Have none of you complaining whiny "geniuses" come up with the idea that what's currently happening in the Ukraine might have something to do with it? Ilya has mentioned before that the Ukraine situation is directly affecting people who work on DCS:WW2. I suggest you guys frigging chill - let's hope everybody working on this title and their families are still well and healthy!

Its pretty confusing. On the KS page it says 28, but he clearly mentioned model 30 in this development update: http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/508681281/dcs-wwii-europe-1944/posts/671732 :huh: I would have actually preferred a Razorback-model, but thats just me. :music_whistling:

Wait. You guys got me all confused again. So I need to buy the P-51 again for WWII, even if I already own it for DCS:World? And its supposed to be the exact same plane? Wasnt the whole point of DCS:WWII to be modular, like DCS:World? Maybe its just that english is not my native language and I am missing the point again.. :huh::book:

So, simply because he is a Moderator he is not allowed to share his opinion on the subject at hand?! You must be joking.

.. amen! Nice read, well posted! :book:

What I have heard and read is that space in the cockpit was tight even for guys that are about 5 foot 6 (which is the opposite of "tall" really). Also in WWII the seatbelts were tightened by the crew chief before take off, most likely to the point of being "pretty damn" tight as far as I know. I dont see the possibility for a WWII era Mustang pilot to leisurly hang his arm out the pit during taxi. The guy in that picture might be using a different, more modern harness arrangement than a pilot in WWII. Who knows if he was doing or going to do any aerobatics that day. Try looking over your shoulder whithout moving your upper body. Personally I think that Headtracking ingame makes this a lot easier than it most likely was in the real thing. Thank god! :D

By the way, it is confirmed that the Jug will be a D-30: http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/508681281/dcs-wwii-europe-1944/posts/671732

http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/508681281/dcs-wwii-europe-1944/posts/671732

http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/508681281/dcs-wwii-europe-1944/posts/671732

Not meaning to do the Moderators job, but in my opinion this "high octane fuel" discussion should be seperated from any thread specific to one plane if possible.. :music_whistling:

Als long as those guys from the cummunity would be qualified people that take it seriously and do their work according to historical correctness, I say do it! Could cut development time on the map-front by a large chunk for sure. :thumbup:

Does that mean the Spit we will get on launch will be an L.F Mk.IX variant? Didnt the F Mk. IX use a different Merlin variant? If I am wrong, please correct me. After all, I am a noob and here to learn primarily. :book:

Well, its quite difficult to implement superiority in numbers in a multiplayer environment, which from a gameplay standpoint, needs to be balanced. :smartass: I am actually looking forward to the awesome challenge that is facing off against a 262 in a Mustang! :pilotfly: edit: I can barely fly the Mustang, so even a parked 262 will be a challenge for me.. :megalol: