X-man

Hi all! I would like to apologize for my lack of support but I have three reasons for it. 1. I don't know Russian. So far my Russian friends and Google translate have helped me :) 2. I don't have a Russian version of LO, so I'm not sure how the meinit.xml looks like in that version. I therefor only included English readme. 3. I have had a lot of work lately, so less time for textures and skins. :( I have made a skin pack with the "clean" skins. I don't like them and I wouldn't fly them myself :lol: Check the 1st post in this thread for links! Cheers ---------------------------------------------------- Привет всем! Я хотел бы извиниться за мое отсутствие поддержки, но у меня есть три причины. 1. Я не знаю русский язык. До сих пор мои русские друзья, и Google Translate мне помог :) 2. У меня нет русской версии LO, поэтому я не уверен, как meinit.xml выглядит в этой версии. Я только в них включены Английский Readme. 3. У меня было много работы в последнее время, тем меньше времени для текстур и скинов. :( Я сделал кожи пакет с "чистыми" скины. Я не люблю их, и я не буду летать я им :lol: Проверка 1 пост В этой связи для резьбы! Ура PS. Thanks STALKER for your help!! :thumbup:

Thanks Snark! :)

Yes, but it probably depends on altitude, pressure, temp etc Here's a video:

Warning or not, an ARH in the face will still screw up your engagement. If you're chasing a guys and you suddenly get a ARH from no where (it found you from off angel or similar), you must defend in one way or another. So you're advantage on the bandit might suddenly turn into a disadvantage, just because the guy fired an ARH in panic before going defensive. ETs have the same effect, just that you have to expect the guy to fire. IMO, both types must be "fixed". And BTW, ETs from 30km rarely hit. ;)

I guess we're down to opinions really. You fly mostly the F-15 and knows the Aim-120s weaknesses and strong sides while Im more of a Flanker guy and knows the ET better. So we're faced with an equal situation but with different equipment...

BOTH ARHs and ETs are equally flawed imho. To say that it's realistic for the F-15 to maddog and not the Su/MiG is a flawed statement. Both sides possess the "maddog"/LAO capability and few here knows how it would actually fair IRL if any of the missiles were in fact maddoged. Fact is, in LO, maddogs are quite successful (although not as a "legit" shot) compared to the actual missiles performance (again, as far as we know).

Yeah, but considering he has been flying the flanker for ALOT longer, and yet his F-15 stats are way above the Su-27 stats. Let's just say, the F-15 is more consistent...

The only "super" I know of... http://www.51st.org/stats/aces.php?pid=09all

Dont know if someone mentioned it, but I would like to see a feature to turn off the log recording for servers with lower specs. Otherwise I find this tool very good! Thanks :thumbup:

Surely, the return would depend on the range...And I doubt the MiG-25 radar is as sensitive as today's AESA radars, so less power is needed...

Yes and yes :) The Viggens are retired and we were the only ones operating them...

Also, I think alot of Mig-29 users "tune" their engines down in peace time to save on maintenance. This causes alot of smoke. In war time they get tuned back up and produce less smoke. Anyone can fill in with better knowledge on this?

But at least you need to open it and maybe scroll or what not. The chatlog doesnt take any workload.

It would be cool if people stop using the server messages as confirmation of kills instead of using their eyes. So a delayed messaged might be cool. But then again, it feels kinda awkward to have a delay on them :)

It was serious, yes.

Would it be possible to change the messages to whatever the server host wants? Also, could there be a delay in the messages for X number of seconds?

Su-27 Data-link :D

Yoda and GG are not only saying that the missiles are porked, but that the game it self is porked when it comes to drag and gravity and a lot of other factors as well. A whole rewrite of that code is needed to solve this problem as not only these missiles are affected (but maybe more then certain others). And for the record, I never questioned that the Aim9 or Aim120 was porked, only how much.

One could argue that that is as close as we can get to whats "real" with our clearance, but it's hardly the whole truth regarding RL Aim9 vs Lockon Aim120 ;) Be more humble

No I do not have a point.... But I cant really agree on something becoming a fact because two people did a few hours research.

Thanks. We all know that thier envelopes are not the same over all altitudes.

So an Aim-9 can fly over 30nm and still have energy to hit a target IRL?

HB! ;)

HB! :)

Folland Gnat http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Folland_Gnat