Rabbit_

Hi Cobra. Thank You for beautiful pictures. I have a question about file 4.jpg. There is veeery slightly visible number marking (only outlines) on the left side under the canopy. Is it supposed to be some sort of "old-taken-away" marking or it's just not clearly visible because of the reflection? Because I saw some pics of repaired Mig-29s and these had something similar. Old leftovers under new markings. :-) I know it's not important....just asking.:smilewink:

I think it's not a big deal. For example....Mig-21s stationed in Line airbase in Czech Republic had almost identical markings. To be honest, I tried to find a single picture of Mig-21 with that type of font You have posted and with no result. Maybe it varied, depending on the country.

Hornet 3.0 :-) You had that "small radius" nukes to wipe the whole airfield. Very nice not-textured vector explosions. ;-)

Pictures look just amazing!!! So many details and I love the shot on the airfield with Mig taxiing. Thanks. BTW: I don't know, who created these textures, but he is a fu*king ACE! :-)

It's great to read this. Thank You.

That is something I wanted to ask as well. High pitch turbine sound is also missing while in external view, so is it going to be changed in the future or this is just how it sounds? Because 21 always had that "ears killing" engine sound. :-)

I also would like to see cold start up and radar demonstration. Thank You.

Thanks a lot.

I'm a little confused on point 2. Isn't everything going to 1.3.0? I thought the 1.3.0 version will just overwrite 1.2.8 version and so we can forget about implementing Mig into 1.2.8. And if You are developing this module towards the version 1.3.0, the version 1.2.8 will be no more, by the time the Mig will be released. :smartass: I just don't know, why asking about having this working in 1.2.8. I know it sounds confusing as well, but here is the summary: Will 1.2.8 and 1.3.0 versions separate things or not? :) Thank You. If it's already mentioned somewhere on the forum, sorry for that.

OK ok....but still, even the moaning (as You call it) is just a personal feeling of simmers, who really like the module and can't wait to get it. :smilewink: And it wasn't about You saying it has to be 100% positive, but about this fashion here on ignoring negative comments. Enough of this. I want manual. :joystick:

I read it enough.

And this is the moment, when all the frustration build up. I understand You, but be sure to be damned on this forum. Because You said something negative and You let Your freewill to intoxicate it here. :smilewink:

I meant it as Flanker said. And I don't see my post any "not-adult" or not responsible or constructive. I think it can't be more constructive. And You showed, I'm right, because You immediately called me a naysayer. This can't be happening. :-DDD And You said: "Just because you are disappointed does not give you free reign to say anything you want and expect to not be called on it." You canť be serious about this one, man. So people have NO RIGHT to write anything here, when they are disappointed. Do You even realize, what You said??? Just another thing I was right about. I knew a few persons in history, who tried this twisted idea on other people and they haven't ended well. :-D

Thank You. You saved me a lot of writting. :-)

It's very funny, how everyone, who has something negative to say on this forum is "stamped" naysayer, hater etc... Of course it's a culture of forum, because that's what the forum is about. Different opinions and point of views. Of course people will be disappointed and sad, they are not gonna get their module in time or anything else and maybe someone will write it on forum. And suddenly everyone is like "HOW DARE YOU!!!???". This is forum and You must be 100% positive about everything or You will be the outcast and hated forever. And I haven't seen anyone to be offensive or something. I think developers are ok with this, because they know, if You want to post on forum, You will deal with positive and with negative opinions. They are creating very complex things, so there will always be bugs and problems, people will report, there will always be someone, who doesn't like, they are postponing release etc. So what is the problem with naysayers? Sometimes You like something and sometimes You don't.

I really understand the frustration of WildBillKelsoe. Why putting so many future modules here? Even when You have two teams, it would be ok to announce two aircraft and get some info on it´s development. Otherwise iIt´s like announcing Battlefield 8. :-) And it really won´t hold You back from development, if You give someone a few pictures and text to post on forum, to let members know, You are working hard on it. I´m not saying they are not working hard, but it´s not very clever to be silent and obviously members get frustrated by it. Of course, there are holidays, free times, personal problems, people get sick and so on... And to all who always put hate on anything negative in ED forums, You know, it´s a forum and no other forum gets so many "thinkers" about other members, why are they so bad and write so bad bad things. I´m sure, nobody points his hate against developers and we are glad, they are making such great modules, but sometimes it needs some info to stay hyped.

It looked strange to me, that noone except Pman, has posted me link to convince me, it is not only about pure speculation or somehow to support what they say. It was easy, wasn´t it? Of course, I can´t see everything on the whole forum, so I admit, I missed this info and so we can close this.:smilewink:

I didn't like You put it like I assume that everyone will feel the same like me. That was the reason, but ok. Thank You for Your opinion.

Yup...I can accept it and that's all. I didn't make this topic to flame here every day. As I said, I see it from my perspective and I wanted people to say their own perspective. Nothing forced, just discussion. Anyway DCS is great, developers are great as well and everyone will just pick his "dream" aircraft or helicopter to fly. :-) Can't wait what the future will bring.

He was writing about Combat Helo. Not Your project. :-)

Yes....but if they would make only the helicopter, it would be thousand times faster. And that is my point. And if You follow their blog, You know how many personal disasters they had to go through and they are still going. First Steam version is just weeks from releasing.

No...I called that on people who write it down here just to defend their opinion. And You are still missing the main reason of this forum. It's difficult to explain to someone, who doesn't want to listen.

Yeah...simulate helicopter physics is piece of cake, man. :-) And for example...Tricubic Studios is preparing to make Combat Helo (AH-64D Longbow Apache standalone). It means whole sim with environment, physics, helicopter systems, enemy units and everything. Mainly only three or four people are behind this. So that's what I say and I'm not telling You to accept it, but I would wait a little longer and get the combat jet right away. I'm not even saying, You can make a BETA version and tune it on the go. Like Mi-8. It's only a choice of developers. Yes,...they want to make trainer, ok. VEAO has the whole original idea behind it and that's something I didn't know and I apologized for it. But why to make shitloads of trainers to one sim, that is very mysterious for me.

OK...I apologize for this. It just got under my radar. :) And TBH, You are the only company, who described the purpose of Your training jet.