six.dof

Hello, As my Son occupy my computer more and more to play DCS, how I get DCS running on a second computer, to play network? Buying all modules I need twice and use the same account, or do I need a new account for my Son, if so, can I buy the modules with the same credit card and different user number? Thanks

In my opinion Germany should keep a small qty of tornado , just minimum training, buying obsolete tornados and parts from other country’s. Get Typhoon ECR, and start the political process to come out of the Nuke dropping story. I remember we had to take out the special weapon equipment if going for training to US, not much trust there. Germany need to be independent from US for defense equipment, as it be used for political pressure ( Turkey's F-35 story), get some Rafale and drop French Nukes would be better????

Just test the MIG-19, and I am happy I didn’t spend the money

timeframe? Getting the news of SC delay, and the huge mountain of issues and unfinished products that ED are pushing in front of them. What would be the timeframe for “eagerly awaited Aircraft”, is there any timeline to end this guessing ? After ED Lift the curtain, what are the timeframe to go EA with it? For me personal I am on hold with any further spending on ED, if buy, than only on EA release day, even pay more money, just save myself from continuous disappointment.

Early version of the Typhoon canards 1960 MIG-Ye8 https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mikoyan-Gurevich_Ye-8

I like DCS a lot, even I don’t have much time for it, I live in Shenzhen/ China and every time I update or download content from the English DCS page i suffer with my 100Mbit connection at 2-120kB/s, with constant interruption. Updates takes sometimes 3 days+ I wish those updates and files could be as a separate torrent file , as the DCS own torrent is not working well here. How other DCS player in China deal with it? Anyone here have better experience, what internet provider is working better with DCS here in China. Is there the same issue with the Chinese language version webpage ? Thanks

actually I don’t mean shake and rappelling like fire the guns or fake turbulence, I mean accurate simulation of Stick deflection, like MIG29, is nearly impossible to fly on the limits as the limiter is an essential part of the flight control system, like in many Aircraft Is there an official ED document on the LUA outputs for each Airframe? Could someone share a link please.

I was wondering, could ED give out over software the value of the stick force and the direction ? As all flight models are calculated in real-time, and estimated that the stick deflection and force is known for each state, would it be not awesome if there would be some output that could be used to build Sticks, that be close to the real thing, as they are very active part in the feedback of the plane.

The flight models of Mig29 and Su27 compared with F-18, F-16,F15 feels like that the US are far superior, much more easy to fly, in contrast real pilots love the MIG29 for it precise and good behavior ... anyway, just my unqualified comment on this topic

Probably another ChristenEagle.......

Hi, Last weekend I was in an electronic market here in China, big TV are cheap... I am wondering how DCS would look on a 75” or 85” 4K screen, also 8K drop in price. What would be the things to look at to select the right one? Currently I use a 40” philips 4K Monitor and it looks good, but a simple pit with huge screen would be awesome. VR is no option as I have eye issues with stereo viewing Thanks

Moin Moin, Ist schon lange her, aber soweit ich mich erinnere haben die Schlösser ( Waffen Aufhängungen) 2 kleine Haken für die Zünder Drähte, die unabhängig gesteuert werden, beim jettison öffnen beide, die Bombe fällt mit verriegelten Zündern, wenn der vordere Draht am Flugzeug bleibt ist Nose, wenn der hintere am Flugzeug bleibt ist für Tail, wenn beide am Flugzeug bleiben ist Nose/Tail. Wichtig für umgelenkte Bomben ist die Splitterwirkung, deswegen sollte die Bombe möglichst schnell explodieren, andere Punkt ist die Ausfallsicherheit, welche mit 2 Zündern erhöht wird. Einzige nutzen den ich für Tail sehe wäre im dive bomb auf harte Ziele.

I just spend a few hours yesterday try to find JF-17 cockpit dimension or details for the MFD, like to print the brezel and buttons. I hope the developer team can share some details on this here, this would be great:thumbup: In genral for the JF-17, i like it very much, a capabal multirole, with enough range for the maps we have

Hello yimox_sk, Thanks a lot, this will help me for a while

Good morning, is it possible to get a user manual for the JF-17, for those who live in country’s without YouTube, VPN are not stable. If I am just to stupid to find it, please some link that works for China. Thanks

Similar as on the Tornado, the “Krueger” ( hope that is the right name for them) flaps are deactivated in the German version, as it has no big advantage ( for low speed) , and save maintenance, in the ECR version they are replaced by the ELS system.

I think the only point of the Radeon 7 is the high speed 16GB VRAM, the question here is, does DCS benefit from it. I read a lot of post where people say that the VRAM in MP getting full, is there any more information on this available, how much VRAM be used in max. @MP? Why in MP the VRAM use goes up? I have a 980ti, which only have 6GB, sometimes in MP it takes for ever to load the grafic ( Water, grass, than step by step parts of the cockpit and buildings) I looking for a new graficcard, I was waiting for AMD, and knowing the postings that say 10GB+ VRAM use, holds me back to buy a 2080 or 2080ti, I play at 4k

In my opinion, those Aircraft could be realized as FC3 Aircraft, like current F-15C is not realistic, in many aspects. For the DCS sim level Aircrafts, many times the flight model and systems are modified during Beta, if the simulation is based on the real data, some even developed with real pilots, wondering why those issues are not fixed on the internal testing, before going to public Beta ( I am not complain about beta modifications ! I just interpret them as necessary improvements on the gameplay, to make it more smooth and easy handling ) The SR71, makes not so much sense with the current map size, but as I remember from some reading, the limiting factor for top speed was the engines first stage blade temperature, but being Mach 3.5 or 3.52 would make no big difference in a PC simulation as the simulation is for sure not 100% I think the frequency is to high for new DCS level Aircrafts, but this seems necessary to keep the business running. Personal I waiting more for dynamic campaign, would even pay for.

Was Europa braucht ist weniger Abhängigkeit von den USA, deswegen eine europäische Lösung. Was kann die SH besser als der Eurofighter? Reichweite? Bewaffnung? Elektronik? Wie kann man sicher sein das die SH nicht nutzlos wird falls den USA etwas nicht passt? Dann sollte man vielleicht Richtung Osten schauen, z.b. SU-34 oder SU-30

I think the F-22 would be the one for booth scenario, BVR and WVR, as sone a 4 - 4.5 Gen fighter get in Visual range, the F-35 chances to survive goes down. I know the big advantage is the SA in the F-35, and Possible the adversary never get to see the F-35, but what if they crack the current Stealth technology, like using low frequency radar or passive radar airborne on AWACS or ever fighter jets like they planned on the SU-57 I personal don’t like the F-35 just from his appearance, is an urgly bird ;-)

Maybe is a good time to think about the use of nukes for Germany, I can’t imaging any scenario where a free fall nuke could make difference, if looking on modern ICBM with multiply MIRV warheads, with high precision, I mean if all the missile based nuke are used, what is left to be nuked? And if, makes more sense to have a stand-off missile like the Taurus to deliver the nuke. Maybe integrate the French Nuke missile that they use on the 2000D. Germany has no control about the nukes, remember the time we had to remove special weapon equipment from the Tornado as we go over the pond to have training there, was 1993. Anyway, finally is al about lobbying, get the right people, just look back on the F-104

Maybe Germany should consider the Rafale with French nukes, than the money and competence stays in Europe, and not relay on the current unstable partner over the Atlantic. Alternative would be to modify the Typhoon to use French Nukes...... Does someone know the Britisch Typhoon can carry nukes ?

I am well trained in passion after the F-18 story;-) Anyway, the F-14 is probably more functional on release, and I looking forward, ED makes the waiting short with adding functions to the F-18 step by step, makes me busy.....

I am sure the ELS can be added by pods, I remember some years ago, that there was a development plan to build an Anti Radar missile based on the Meteor missile. The question is stealth really the most important for future conflicts, or is the economic factor much more important ? I believe that future conflicts are similar to current conflicts in Syria and Afghanistan, Steahlt was not necesssry to operate in those conflicts. Another Point ist to be independent from the USA, as current situation shows how fast the relationship can change, no spare parts, no flights

I think the Typhoon is the better one for the German Airforce, simplify the whole logistic and training, also technology wise, the frame, aerodynamic and engines are much more advanced than the F-15, and most important, we can get spare parts, even if have political crysis over the Atlantic. I locking forward to see what will be the next generation of European fighter jet