Teknetinium

All is a hypothetical regarding tracking, thats why I told ED nothing makes it less realistic to have better probability for ER/ET in DCS, at the moment it is way to low at around 13%. It should be at 30% and it is but that is when ED test it on AI. In DCS MP it boils down to around 13%. That is what I want ED to look at.

I do other things for work, I just tell you what some people that know more then me have said, As well as Balkans aim-120 50% hit rate at best is know fact. Now look what they were facing, Mig-29A with no RWR or jammers, we dont know if they had Chaff :)

I suggest you become more logical, you want ER/ET go for countermeasures 100% but dont want to accept the fact that actives can be jammed and chaffed as Er:)

So did aim-120 in Balkans, at best 50% did hit as documentation say on aircraft with no RWR or jammers and overwhelming numbers.

videos show something different :) So you want to play and assume that jammers should not work on actives or at all but ER-27/ET should go for Chaff and Flares 100% of the time. Lovely logic.

There is no guarantee that ER-27/ET will go for chaff or Flares as well, It would be appreciated if ED could look in to that.

Then jammers would work on active missile from 10km by your logic, but this is DCS and you are not making you self a favor when you facing a bandit and using exploits that will make bandits missile miss 100%, there is no such tricks in RL.

I have direct contact with Su-27/Su-30/EF-2000 pilots as well and they tell me other stories then you and ED. lol but hey their life is on the line :) Only in DCS can you fly straight pupping flare and chaff and knowing that ER-/ET will go for countermeasures 100%, only in DCS :) Frostie made a good point, the probability for ER-27/ETs tracking is way to obvious compare to RL or other missiles in DCS. As I told you I have video of 4 T/73 fired in RL combat, I cant have better prove.

You could go to space if all was about processors, but its not! For your knowledge GG, ER-27 and ET had updates as well!

We are talking power output, not only processor. Thats why I say, you take all the positives but disregard the negatives, and on Su-27 point out only negatives.

Can you explain how and why aim-120B/C have better chaff rejections them su-27? Chiz?

Why are aim-120 C/B not effected by chaff as much then, you have to be 90 degrees and pop all chaff you have to miss, AIM-120C is even worse you need to be below 500km/h, I feel AIM-120 are slightly to good in chaff rejection if you compare to Su-27 radar, as well as it is not making DCS less realistic if aim-120 go for chaff by more%

Chiz, how is it going with this conformation? https://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=3887106&postcount=263

https://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=3887106&postcount=263 How is it going with this conformation?

Would AIM-120B/C radar not have same problem with chaff from 10km? Dose AIM-120B/C radar have better chaff rejection then Su-27 radar?

:worthy:

ER-27 is guided by DL as well.

The best analogy is to make Aim-120B/C to react more to chaff then they are doing now, its like Aim-120B/C have better radar and chaff rejection then Su-27 radar from 10km in DCS witch I dont believe is the case in RL.

I like Mig-27, get in and out fast.

In 90s there were more Modern Su-30s then most EU countries have, why do you compare Russia to States and that there must be 1000 of one type to be counted.

Void78, you can simulate Uganda vs Nato and fly it if you like. If we want to play competitively in DCS we have to strip down Nato aircrafts weapons to same era. Not fun but not all want to fly Uganda vs Nato. Thats why all models are welcome. J-11A/B,Su-27S/SM.

Let Chiz or GG explain Eritrean war for you :) Ill explain some facts from Yugoslavia, Yemen, Syria :) Do you believe in 13% when you see this video, It should be at least at 30% in MP! There is no pure data on how good missiles are tracking, ED what you are doing with ER-27 have nothing to do with realism but it is effecting DCS competitive arena in negative way. Let me put it this way, what dose say that missiles track more realistically now then compare to FC1? How is it possible that Su-27s radar is weaker against Chaff from 10km then Aim-120B/C radar :)?

J-11B/A would do just fine! I hope Dekawork get a rabbit out of the hat. This simulator was built on Su-27, Its a shame it had to go so far. At least my self started DCS for Su-27 back in ghe days. If I wanted Nato aircrafts I could go to BmS long time a go! If only ED maintained the existing Flankers as well wold not harm!

Dekaworks make us happy after JF-17 plz, J-11B/A would do just fine.