Teknetinium

;) LOL, video say more then Eritrean words :)

No it dont work, test your self, dive from 7500m and pull the stick at ALT 1000m and plz have speed more then 1400km/h. LOL Chiz, If you believe in Eritrean stories so I can believe in Yemen stories. You started to talk about Eritrea now for 10 years lol, there is new data that you dont take in. I have video evidence, What do you have? The developer has not made the G-limiter as it should work, why do G-limiter not work as in Su-27? I cant brake wing in Su-27 as in Su-33! Dose ED have a policy not to say or do anything positive for Russian Aviation in DCS?

How many missiles do you have data on that was fired in Eritrean war? Chiz I have been flying for some while and adapting to changes, But Su-33 G limiter is broken and should not let you to pull it to self destruct if G limiter is on. Its not fun to lose aicrafts to wing destruction in competitive environment where others are not effected, even more so when Su-33 has a G limier in RL that works!

This is not oki ED, Last Flanker pilots ask for help, and you think we are idiots, LOL Chiz, we have intel as well, plz check tracks that we send you Chiz. So it is oki to take stats from Eritrea but not from Yemen and Georgia?

Some are making stats from Eritrean war :) Chiz, LOL Su-33 has a G limiter that dont WORK!!! It should be as in Su-27, and G limiter should let you to get up to 9gs, Chiz dont take me for an Ediot, there is no Intel on tracking! How are you making a judgment on how good it should track? Russian = Shit ? and Listen to GGs Eritrean war stories :) I have at least video prove, what do you have?

Dont agree, F-18 fly with 40Gs + for over two years, while Su-33 break wings for 4 years now. Same problem as Su-27 had as the PFM was implemented, There is no data that say ER-27 is hitting around 13% in RL. There is evidence that ET dose even better, round 50%. Yes, I do believe your judgment is bias, same regarding EOS ranges with no gate. Where do you have data on that EOS cant lock a target with no gate over 10km? 73 seeker dose better :)

LOL, Check ER/R-27 it go for chaff to easy! PLZ! 13% in MP combat is way to little. There is video prove that ET/T/73 should be on 50% in real combat:) Stop be so BIAS!

Why dose AIM-7 guide better and have better chaff resistance then ER/R-27 in DCS?

Nice pictures, Yes, Malaysian Pilots know what they are talking about ;)

Should be easy to notch AIM-120B/C against ground clutter with chaff as well. ED like to make Su-27/33 realistic but nothing else :)

Agree!!! FC3 Su-27 PFM is more realistic then full models, multiplayer see all :)

Chizh, thank you for your attention for Su-33s braking wing with G-limiter on. I will send you in the test in private regarding 11%

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23926661 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/591467

Howe long time can a human stay at 9gs?

T against F-15E has better statistics, brush up yours :) 51st has actually proved that it dose not do better then 14% at any range. The test was done against human opponent in controlled environment witch is big difference then EDs AI tests, I give you data from combat not from test flights against AI. The data was sent to ED but ignored.

I know for a fact that there is no information on that ER-27 dont hit more then 11% ;)

Agree, Flankers and MIG-29 need attention, where is MIG-29S? On cold metal On cold boat. On power idle. Su-27 EOS dont need the processing power for clear image, It need to to see contrast only. What new information dose ED have now that made EOS with less range and work not as good as, lets say in Fc2? What new information made ET go for first flare? What new information made ER-27 hit not more then ~11%? Where can you find that F-18 fly longer distance then Su-27/33 at 350 - 1000m? Where can you find that Su-33 braking wings with no working G-limiter while Su-27 make maximum 7G with G limiter on? Thank you for simulating INS though, good work!!!

Its strange that its always Sukhoi or Mikoyan side get the realistic minuses regarding missiles/PFM/fuel consumption. F-15/F-18 have not this limits even if they would have that in real life, Just compare the Gs they can make with no destruction! I see this pattern for years! You cant fool me twice. I will send you the list in private Chizh with some tracks and explanation what is going on in MP, I hope Ed start to represent Sukhoi and Mikoyan better then it has been done past few years. No announcement on EDs home page about J-11 just shows how much you think about the Flanker. Let me tell you, there are more then you would imagine that wait for a working Flanker with more then 10% probability to hit with ER/ET. Ask you self if you were CO of Sukhoi, how would you feel about how ED and you self represent Sukhoi?

Great work HB as always!

Can ED tell me where the 10km and 14km EOS range on F-15/18/14/16 from, this needs to be addressed! EOS is stronger then IR missiles seeker!!!

F-18/16 IR signature is not fixed :(

:cheer3nc::cheer3nc::cheer3nc: appreciated a lot! G-limiter should not allow to exceed Gs to a braking point, should work at least as in Su-27.

How is it possible that F-18 fly longer distance then Su-27/33/F-15 at 1000m power 100? I think F-18 is fine but Su-27/33/F-15 under modeled in fuel consumption or drag.

Thank you Chizh, appreciated a lot!

G limiter should not allow you to reach thous limits, You should not look at your G limiter!!! Plz test your self.