Teknetinium

All that I stated are facts in DCS supported with data, as 15% ER-27 hit rate, unfortunately it dont represent real life at all.

Why do Su-33 brake wings with G limiter on? Why do F-18C fly longer distance then F-15 and Su-27? Why do ER-27 have 15% hit ratio and not above 30%? This thing are fundamental to combat simulator!

I could digg up tracks from Fc3 ET in the FACE! Its a Fact and there is data on that ER-27 is at 15% at MP servers as it is now. Should be at 30% at least. Do you have data on if EOS can lock F-18 head on from 25km or 10km? PLZ show me as well one example Su-33 brake wings with G limiter on Show me one example where F-18 with 3 tanks fly longer distance then F-15 with 3 tank and Su-27

What ever you did ER-family ET/ER track 3 times worse then in FC3 time. That way or the other is just pointless to argue. We have agreed that it should be around 30%. The data show that ER-27 is at 15% on MP servers. Im talking about pilots that know how to support their missiles

Good that you mentioned it!!! What prove do you have that ER/ET-27 should track 3 times worse then 3 years a go, lets say in FC3 times? The only thing that you achieve is bad MP environment with no facts or prove. We could talk all day about range and so on. But arguing that ER-27/ET should be at 15% or 30% has just no prove out there. So it is up to developers to find the realism in that respect. At the moment it is just a joke!!!

Its been very bad for three years, I hope ER/ET start to track better then Vietnam era missiles. If you look at statistics on MP servers ER-27 has 15% hit rate, It should be at least at 30%, then we all fine.

If AIM-120 dont have magic INS its a Bug. If AIM-120 go for chaff it is a bug. If Aim-120 go for Jammers is a bug. AIM-120 is a laser in DCS for long time now :) ED LOL ED

Agree Coxy, If we want to take jammer bug in to concidiration that effect AIM-120 then we should take ER chaff bug in to consideration as well since it effect ER-27. Quite simple but it seams many see things only from their own perspective. Some time this people need a reminder :)

So we are left with Chaff bug. Could we look into event with no chaff. would be fun to test.

So we dont use Chaff then since it is confirmed as a bug? Can you show me ED conforming the jammer bug?

It has not been confirmed as a bug by ED, It might be intended until you get effected by jammers. So when Ed confirm this as a bug then it is :) For what I know ED did confirm it was not.

Bug? Confirmed by who? Link? kill 100% is not true. The bug is that F-16/F-18/F-14 are not effected by jammers.

Is there evidence that aim-120 should not be effected by jammers after pitbull? Not to mention chaff ;) If so, show me.

[51☭] Teknetinium - RED - Rain

Thank you! Let us know if you want to test it extensively, we could do it with pleasure.

We will manage with bellclocks instruments, only if ED make ER/ET-27 hit 30% in MP and not only 14%.

:cheer3nc::cheer3nc::cheer3nc:

What? Why? How? Do some think that AIM-120 has better radar and countermeasure resistance then F-15/F-18/F-16/F-14/Su-27/33/M-2000 radar. If radar can lose lock, Im sure aim-120B/C should do that much more then what we see in DCS ;),

WOW something fixed for ER instead of braking it!!!! THANK YOU A LOT, WE MEAN IT! PLZ make test in MP and get it to 30% instead of SP, for some reason the stats change even if AI and RL-player dose the same maneuver and pop same amount of chaff. in MP ER has 14% should be at 30% at least.

At this stage Flanker would sell more then F-15E, The effort as you mentioned is another thing.

So Sexy!

I think, F-16, F-18, F-14, AV-8, A-10 should do just fine, some more focus on other side of the coin plz.

Congratulations TAW!

That I agree on.