Teknetinium

LOL Chiz I leave this forums, look up your own fact before calling fake R-37M is nice developed 1986? I think Su-35 or Russian Su-30SM3 would have even more F-15 kills then MKI.

Yemen 2xR-27T fire 1 hit 50%.

Pointless!!! DCS missiles are not even close to RL so ED could just change any parameter to get the % up!

Im not talking about balance, dont put words in my mouth, Im talking about that ER-27 should be around 30% and not 15% hit rate. I have data that proves 15% case. Who talk about balance? Making ER-27 hit 30% will just make DCS more realistic. At the moment it is a Vietnam standard on ER-27/ET. Im not here to teach you anything, Im here to talk about DCS compare to real life!

I dont know what to tell you more that this broken missiles for more then 3 years now!!! Vietnam standard for 3 years

Talking in circles with no result, still 15% for more then 3 years! Just make a fix. Just for you knowledge, people stopped flying Flanker because of there is no attention to missiles for years, not that it missing clickable buttons!!!

Another topic we should not talk about it here. Very easy to replicate, fly faster then 1300km/h below 6000meters and pull the stick gently, the lower you get the worse it gets. G limiter should not allow you to break the plane!

Some pilots have better some less, but we will land around 15% if you look over all.

.

I hope so, It just ridicules that supported data that is very easy to get is declined and with that claiming that the ER family should be this bad for years

Im sure you know more then me but you dont use Er-27 in DCS MP as much as me and I dont think you know how bad the ER/ET are. I think we all agree that ER-27 should hit more then 15%. Its not my job to know how you fix it, I think we booth could agree on that ER-27 should be around 30%. Efter 1000 missiles fired in a MP arena you can make the judgment of the missiles performance. At this point we are over that

All that I stated are facts in DCS supported with data, as 15% ER-27 hit rate, unfortunately it dont represent real life at all.

Why do Su-33 brake wings with G limiter on? Why do F-18C fly longer distance then F-15 and Su-27? Why do ER-27 have 15% hit ratio and not above 30%? This thing are fundamental to combat simulator!

I could digg up tracks from Fc3 ET in the FACE! Its a Fact and there is data on that ER-27 is at 15% at MP servers as it is now. Should be at 30% at least. Do you have data on if EOS can lock F-18 head on from 25km or 10km? PLZ show me as well one example Su-33 brake wings with G limiter on Show me one example where F-18 with 3 tanks fly longer distance then F-15 with 3 tank and Su-27

What ever you did ER-family ET/ER track 3 times worse then in FC3 time. That way or the other is just pointless to argue. We have agreed that it should be around 30%. The data show that ER-27 is at 15% on MP servers. Im talking about pilots that know how to support their missiles

Good that you mentioned it!!! What prove do you have that ER/ET-27 should track 3 times worse then 3 years a go, lets say in FC3 times? The only thing that you achieve is bad MP environment with no facts or prove. We could talk all day about range and so on. But arguing that ER-27/ET should be at 15% or 30% has just no prove out there. So it is up to developers to find the realism in that respect. At the moment it is just a joke!!!

Its been very bad for three years, I hope ER/ET start to track better then Vietnam era missiles. If you look at statistics on MP servers ER-27 has 15% hit rate, It should be at least at 30%, then we all fine.

If AIM-120 dont have magic INS its a Bug. If AIM-120 go for chaff it is a bug. If Aim-120 go for Jammers is a bug. AIM-120 is a laser in DCS for long time now :) ED LOL ED

Agree Coxy, If we want to take jammer bug in to concidiration that effect AIM-120 then we should take ER chaff bug in to consideration as well since it effect ER-27. Quite simple but it seams many see things only from their own perspective. Some time this people need a reminder :)

So we are left with Chaff bug. Could we look into event with no chaff. would be fun to test.

So we dont use Chaff then since it is confirmed as a bug? Can you show me ED conforming the jammer bug?

It has not been confirmed as a bug by ED, It might be intended until you get effected by jammers. So when Ed confirm this as a bug then it is :) For what I know ED did confirm it was not.

Bug? Confirmed by who? Link? kill 100% is not true. The bug is that F-16/F-18/F-14 are not effected by jammers.

Is there evidence that aim-120 should not be effected by jammers after pitbull? Not to mention chaff ;) If so, show me.

[51☭] Teknetinium - RED - Rain