Jump to content

Proof

Members
  • Posts

    61
  • Joined

  • Last visited

1 Follower

About Proof

  • Birthday October 23

Personal Information

  • Occupation
    Student

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. From the Ch-47 Cold Start Video:
  2. @Chizh Hello. Here you mention plans to remake the Caucasus map, are there still plans to do so in the future?
  3. I don't believe it is a skin included with the module. I think it's this one from the user downloads section, so it would be best to direct the report to the maker of the livery. https://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/files/2140835/
  4. I know this may not be ideal but if you feel the need to alter the Soviet props, perhaps supplementing the I-16s with some lend lease Spitfire Mk.IXs might work; they already have a small selection of their soviet liveries to help avoid friendly fire. And then just remain hopeful that OctopusG bring us a La-7.
  5. Both the request and reply were made on April 29, 2021. The thread is for all wishlist items spanning back 10 years, not just this one request. Unless I'm missing your point, in which case, sorry.
  6. For what it's worth, apparently an overhaul is already planned.
  7. So Chizh did an interview in Russian a year or two ago and was asked about the Yak-130 I don't have the original source but here is that interview translated by someone here on the forums https://docs.google.com/document/d/1a9qc0vlLOD89a3wJ_5WjrtZgF53RHyIrKAGnaNxiLeI Maybe things have changed since then though and I agree it would be a cool addition.
  8. Fantastic additions so far guys and if resources permit I'd love to see a PLA infantryman added eventually too.
  9. Ozone1, these assets look great but I think you would probably have more luck creating a new dedicated thread for them in order to attract potential help. Also you could inquire over at the DCS modding Discord server to see if anyone there is willing to lend a hand; the discord can be found here: https://discord.gg/Jje5WYr
  10. A giant +1 from me for a paid UH-1N upgrade, and also agreed that outside of that there's not a whole lot that would make me pay to upgrade the existing H. Personally I don't think seeing infantry in the back seat should she be a "Huey upgrade", whilst it is something I very much want to see I believe this should be a wider core inclusion that isn't limited to the Huey. Infantry riding in all helicopters, in landing craft, in or on top of armoured vehicles etc is something I've been wanting to see in DCS for a long time. And the below image gives me hope that one day it will be a reality or is at least being explored. However, paying for the ability to see them isn't something I can imagine myself doing.
  11. I'm unsure if you are asking for modules or AI, we know there is a Zero at least planned so for me I'd like to see both the B5N Kate and either the D3A or D4Y (the latter of which I believe saw action in the Marianas). With the Zero as a fighter, these two options would add both a dive bomber and a torpedo bomber into the mix; a trio of roles I would also love to see the represented on both sides, as an example the Avenger and Dauntless for the US. I'm sure there are people out there who will correct me on any historical inaccuracies/discrepancies for the time periods but I think these three roles for both sides would make for a very interesting and dynamic line up with a relatively small number of planes needed. From my understanding information required to make complete Japanese aircraft modules is hard to come by, and so as much as I would love for the two I mentioned to be modules, I would still think they would be great additions even if limited to AI.
  12. I asked if this would be the case in EDs Discord, NL stated that would not be the case, instead we would only have one A-10C version. As an example I compared it to the two versions we have of the P-51, the answer I was given is that we would not have the option of two aircraft listed, but we could still use the old version as we do now. This to me is a little ambiguous; it is not clear to me if we basically use it like the existing A-10C we have now by just opting not to use the new features whilst flying it or if the new features can be somehow limited, for example in the mission editor under the 'additional properties', the way the Mirage 2000 has the option to not mount the DDM Sensors etc. Personally, if the changes are significant enough I think we should have the option to use the older version even after purchasing the upgrade, for both the A-10C and the Ka-50.
  13. Allow initial point objects to be included when saving/loading static template files or create a separate template save function for them, please.
  14. For me; 1.)A selection box allowing us to quickly select multiple objects at once and be able to move/rotate that selection as one. 2.)An Undo and Redo feature, with appropriate hot keys. 3.)(I'm not sure if this one counts as a mission editor request) the ability to assign nations/factions to numbered or named coalitions, to quote a similar suggestion:
×
×
  • Create New...