OperatorJack

I applied to the last one well in time to get a place on the first team, never got put down for it though for some reason :(

I hope we can have customisable belts, or at least an option for a few different types. And the ability to adjust gun convergence wouldn't go amiss

Is it too late to sign up as a reserve? If so I'd like to be a reserve F-5 pilot

Will you pay him to?

Yes but that isn't the point is it, if you want to have an actual WW2 experience you're going to buy it. You said it yourself you won't be able to play any servers with the assets if you don't own them yourself. What a fantastic way to fragment the community.

But once the bundle isn't available? What then?

I'd rather actually have a Korea map... In fact Normandy couldn't possibly be more different to Korea without leaving the planet.

Didn't think about VR users, that's a fair enough reason really

The sad part is all the stuff needed in game for radios is already modelled. DCS just has no built in voice client to transmit voices over the radios. One of many arguably essential missing features in this fantastic "sim"

Isn't ED's main source of income from military contracts for sim software? Cutting ties with Russia in that regard seems silly.

My favourite feature is the stuttering in combat, freezes when I'm nose down and the game crashes when a missile is launched or hit me. I'm not blaming BS guys for this, it's a symptom of DCS being a horrible platform for this kind of thing.

Just bumping my signup :smilewink:

Anyone else having tacview issues? My tracks only display me and nothing or nobody else.

You wouldn't consider perhaps removing the markers on the server and having the liveries become distinct enough per team so that visual ID is possible? Perhaps include in the briefing what each aircraft looks like for red and blue Just a suggestion, I did have fun the other day seeing who I could take on in my F-5! :megalol:

Sign me up Operator Jack F-5

If you're looking for only bombs able to kill tanks then restrict S-24s, Kh-66 and of course the nukes should probably be removed. I'm not indenting to be mean spirited with any questions or doubts about the rules, I hope it's not come across like that. :thumbup:

The R3R is hardly a BVR missile, just saying :music_whistling:

I'm gonna be honest here. I want kill messages to fellate my ego when I score a kill, and to live Ace Combat tier fantasies of knowing exactly who I'm fighting and how dangerous they are.

Not saying it's literally the same thing but you can see my line of reasoning. Guns only seems like a really good idea though

Every time I try to view a tacview .acmi from the server it displays only my aircraft and nothing else. Also, the 10 minute anti cheat thing.

That's not an externally imposed limitation though. That's like saying the F-5 can only use 1 engine because the MiG is limited to 1 engine... :dunno:

Kill messages are just something that divides the playerbase even more. I personally support them being included but I can live without. As Manzanita said it's nice to see what kills you so that you can tell if it was blue on blue or a manpads etc.

How come the MiG is limited to 2 R-60Ms per flight per aircraft only? I'm not trying to slam the rule or anything I just don't understand the reasoning.

I think both sides get the same SAMs if I'm not mistaken

I fly Mirages as my only A2A plane in BF you fool