Jump to content

Megaladon7k

Members
  • Posts

    33
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Megaladon7k

  1. Yes, in fact you are so logical that you are argueing over when a week starts, no one even cares when the week starts or which day is the first day of the week, we live by the same weeks we call the days the same way... But ofcourse you would need to question it, to attemp to show your dominance over the Americas. Seems like you still have some nationalism in you from the 19th and 20th century.
  2. Megaladon7k

    Removed

    Thanks for clearing it out, but is there a setting for the antenna to be automatic moving up and down? because I messed around with the radar controls and the numbers on the left were changing by themselves 1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4 etc. I could also move it up and down manually and it would continue doing the 1,2,3,4. I am probably doing a horrible job of describing it, but that is he best I could do :D
  3. Megaladon7k

    Removed

    The update is great thank you RAZBAM, I just don't understand the vertical axis controls of the radar and how they work.
  4. Megaladon7k

    Removed

    So does the radar elevation scan at a certain altitude or a range of different altitudes? is it like Su-27 radar elevation or like F-15?
  5. I will take pictures later, but I am at work right now :)
  6. I did exactly what you did, but my game textures are the same as vanilla, any help? I am on 1.5 latest version/
  7. The only way I am buying this module, is if you can use the tailhook on carrier landings, or AGM-65 Mavericks. Too much single purpose aircraft in the game to be completely honest!
  8. FC3 aircraft are not meant to be realistic in any shape or form other than flight model. the range for FC3 aircraft missile has been lowered by a factor, to compensate for the easy mechanics, meanwhile full fidelity aircraft take more time and effort to use and get realistic missile fight dynamics, in my honest opinion it seems very fair.
  9. Thanks for the info, can't wait for those munitions to come out seems like good fun on 104th ground pounding; watched some IRL footage and wow it looks sick.
  10. I guess you are right, and I wasn't really thinking soberly I am just really eager to get a new module. But I have to say coding information interests some of us, as we work in that field. and most importantly I hope in the long run they will have a bucket of information for us that will keep us going for a while.
  11. But they are constantly workin at the F/A-18c module, don't get me wrong I respect them but if they are going to announce a module they should update us with their progress, as well as they could update us with the AJS-37, and there is an example of a reasonable hold off of information, such as the AJS-37 it was a secret until 2016 and now it's already >95% done. As well as the Mirage 2000c update it's already on DCS 2.0 but not on 1.5.3 where the majority of people resides. At this point any information from them would be highly appreciated on the upcoming modules, I mean 2016 is promising to be the greatest year in DCS history and we haven't had a development update since January.
  12. +Silver_Dragon yeah, what I really want is some development informational update, feels like ED has been getting excuses for every week to not release any actual news, but I believe there is nothing they can tell us next that isn't actual news, unless someone creates some campaign :/
  13. Mirage should be receiving major changes! Edit: seems like another disappointing newsettler about some discounts....
  14. I've fires AIM-54 which have gone I believe 150,000ft, I don't remember it was in 2013 but it was over 100,000ft for sure.
  15. Thanks for the info guys, so you by any chance know anything about the caliber of the rocket?
  16. Oh I actually have the mirage, I was just saying how I got on to the information about the BAP, the mirage is truly a great aircraft, but I am hungry for a new module like F-14 or F-18c :)
  17. So I am extremely hungry for a new DCS module and already have my credit card on the starting line to spend some money on DCS, and I was browsing on the Roadmap and under Mirage it said "BAP-100 (in progress)" "BAP-120 (in progress)" I am wondering if anyone has any information on those munitions and when we are going to see them in our game? From what I see the BAP-100 is basicly a cluster bomb which would be amazing for the Mirage since it's ground attack accuracy isn't the greatest and the BAP-120 is a BAP-100 with a propulsion system. Would like to hear your thoughts on this and any info you know would be highly appreciated :thumbup:
  18. I believe that the -D has an extra MFD atleast in P3D it does but I could be wrong. and that is interior difference I have realized :/ but exterior I think it's identical. except the engines as you have said :)
  19. I've seem this issue a long time ago, I didn't know if it was relevant but when I would turn off FBW and pull on the stick my plane would continue flying backwards at the same velocity until eventually it would stop. something is definitely wrong with Mirage's physics.
  20. Wow thanks for the article that's pretty cool stuff. I am really excited for the Viggen!!!!!!
  21. What would be a use of "zoomed mavericks" if there is no display to even guide them :huh: Whatever it is, I have so many questions, and hopefully the release is going to happen in spring so I will find out from practice:pilotfly:
  22. That is disappointing, still going to get it though, but how can you tell your radar is locked on to a T-90 and not some house?
  23. Can anybody confirm or disconfirm that the AJS-37 Viggen we are getting has an MFD? Since I've heard we are getting a 199- variant and MFD were very common in the 90s on modern aircraft. Would it look something like this? or something more like this?
  24. If any way then it would have to be an international variant since Russian intellegence won't share any info. But in my opinion the future of DCS will include servers with 4gen aircraft, servers with 3rd gen aircraft and servers with 2gen aircraft.
  25. I am sure it won't get to the point of 2017 aircraft, we might get those in 20 years, but 2000s seems reasonable to a limit like the Eurofighter, Su-35, F-35(RIP)
×
×
  • Create New...