shab249

I think it's a great idea but add it to the C as well because i'm pretty sure it has support for it too Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

Duuuudddde mig 21 is awesome i like it more than the A10C they did great job with it Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

Ask japan when the us took it from thete (after russian mig 25 landed there) Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

But it has no radar :( Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

After reading this i agree the 22 has lack of weapons but the 24 is the same but with kh 31 (anti ship) radar guided missile and a gun so i think F-4 with agm 12 agm 78 and aim 7e will be more interesting because we already have the su-25 that is pretty close in loadout Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

But the coclit is very similar to the 21 so i prefer a the F-4E and they already solved the 2 cockpits problem in the F-14 Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

Even the first varients of the mig 21 had automatic engine cone positioning why the 23 didnt had the same thing for the wings? Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

Yea i do that too but it's not a bug the radar antena is 20 and something ° up and 1.5 or 2.5 down but if you go upside down you use the up area as low altitude scanner Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

It was more effective than what it is in dcs but there is a reason that all us fighters now using 20mm and now moving to 25. Its not effective as the 23mm's in the mig-15 and the 37 was meant for bombers/ground and its pretty good for that roll i most say Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

Yea i,m not saying they are 1:1 copy but they are very comparable and the 17 was the solution for takeoffs and landings that was really bad in the 7 but much better because the variable wings Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

Props are not good enogh for fighters :)

I was at 500m with my antena up and a c-130 was at 1500m and i didnt got him on my radar Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

Su-17 = su-7 with variable wings Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

Na the mig 25 is boring it cant go over then 3G's and shoots from 100km away so i prefer the mig-23 in that case BUT PLEASE MAKE F-4 OR SU-22 Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

Sorry to be like that but please no ww2 era in dcs has 4 jets and vietnam era has 2 and the f-5 wasn't even that famous and iconic as the mig 21bring us an F-4 Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

i prefer an F-4 but we have almost no russian jets in DCS so now i prefer the 24 over the 17/22

and a mig-29 lol but we already have it (well...) pleaseeeeeeeee FFFF-4444444 4 **** sake we need it but please bring AIM-7E with it the M is too new and powerful for vietnam i already opened a thread about it

ammm i can someone move it to the mig-21 forum

there is no efficent and there is "cant detect c-130 below 2000m"

.

The best tip is in 2 words Fuel tanks I hate air refueling its impossible Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

Dry thrust of 74KN dude are you talking about mig 23 because it cant be a 21 Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

Howww? Edit:in the manual it says 4,000m Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

I tried when i was dogfight at 2000-3000 and tested it in 15,000 or 11,000 and i saw no change Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

I tested it and it does absolutely 0 it only turns on the emergency afterburner light but thats it Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk