Jump to content

shab249

Members
  • Posts

    182
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by shab249

  1. I tested it and it does absolutely 0 it only turns on the emergency afterburner light but thats it Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
  2. Random failures does exist in dcs they can set pre writen probability and make it possible Take a look at the mission planner in every jet when you are the pilot there is category for failures and their chance. It can be the engine, radar, electric bus and more Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
  3. Not only technology changed that is true BUT still f-4's shoot a lot of them (and f-15's but they were pretty new back then) and the main enemy still was mig-21's (and 23's but most of them were 21's) so technology did her role and if you want to tell me that mig 17's was the main enemy in vietnam and its kind of true they didnt even had any RWR so that should increase the kill probability not make it 15% Wikipedia: aim-7 page Kill count summary CategoryUSN USAF Combined AN-2s 2 N/A 2 MiG-17s 5 8 13 MiG-19s N/A 4 4 MiG-21s 3 38 41 Total 10 50 60 Ill repeat myself The M had better look down shoot down capability (that was nice in the days of mig 17's ah? Well they didnt had that before so 15%) Dual thrust engine from 30km to 70km range yea thats more than double Better ECM resistance (wasnt very critical back than) And solid state electronics that made the missile MUCH more reliable Pretty big change ah? Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
  4. Actually in vietnam the air fore did x5 more kills with aim 7 then the navy 10 for the navy and 50 for thr airforce again only with aim 7 Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
  5. Lets compare the range and ECM resistance of the current M and the E (in real life) in dcs ECM does nothing when you're locked 30km vs 70km range 30kg vs 40kg of explosive And ****ing 15% chance to hit vs 68% Those 15 YEARS (- +) made a diffrent The old AIM-7E was not very reliable with non solid state electronics and sometimes will just drop the lock even without any countermeasures or maneuvers at all The R3R of the mig 21 does that as well because of the poor technology back then it will just be fair for the E varient to be added And really mig 21's couldn't shoot down F-4's? Dude please read more about that war the us did get more kills but not as they tought they will. They designed most of the F-4's without a gun because they trusted thr AIM-7 but... it was designed against bombers so it couldn't get any mig's in the F-4E they added internal gun because of the heavy losses Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
  6. IDK but im sure that if they could copy the M or the AIM 120 they can copy that too Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
  7. Let me correct you The legend say's that the F-18 in development lol After i flew the mig 21 i dont want to do everything else than fly with him so im not good at telling you mirage or viggen. For me the viggen wins mirage looks fun there isn't any real enemies for the mirage, f15/su27 kick his ass in BVR if we had the f16 or f18 (its not about the size its about the radar) so yea, but sadly we dont. Even that the franch air force is more interesting than Sweden air force, viggen sounds more fun and i see the amazimg job leatherneck did with the mig 21 so i cant imagine how good the viggen is im a fanboy of them now Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
  8. I agree but really i dont see the mig 23 in dcs in the near future Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
  9. Win 10 64 bit Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
  10. The M varient is from 1982 but when we want vietnam era fight with the phantom we have to use the much more powerful M. in that case MIG-21 will never win please add the E version it can be usefull for the upcoming F-14 and the F-4 It has less explosive charge much less range poor ECM resistance And the kill probability was 15% (but i guess its because aggresive maneuvers from MIG 17/19) Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
  11. In the BIS version you have only 1 gun but i guess you knew that in some versions it has 2 23mm guns. But those 2 more buttons are if the gun jammed or if (in real life) the ground crew loaded some ammo but didnt load the first button because of time (well its an interceptor) Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
  12. Maybe SU 17? i would like to see that or a SU-25TM full cockpit Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
  13. *triggered* Lol ammm yea i know its diffrent jet in a lot of ways but think about it like that The 21bis had radar range of 30km and the first 23 had radar range of 40-45km while the 21 has ground attack capability and better maneuverability So if they'll make a 23 they have too do a late model like the 23MLD if not its pointless Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
  14. Add it to DCS it will be so helpful for servers with rescue helicopters Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
  15. It will be great but i want the devs to focus on things like F-4 F-14 or Mirage 3 (i will buy it immediately and yes im from israel :) ) because its very comparable to the mig 21 that we already have (the cockpit is almost the same) so maybe in 2018 Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
  16. shab249

    F5 or mig 21 ?

    Those shakings and hard landings are actually pretty cool for me atleast i like that the jet sometimes fight with the pilot It show the real toughness of old soviet machines Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
  17. F15 burned it with his afterburner Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
  18. I wrote something to you but then i understood that im wrong Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
  19. NOPE i was an idiot Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
  20. Explain remote controlled missiles please Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
  21. 4 weeks?!?! Dude thats a lot Anyway they released it maybe because your threat so thank you Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
  22. You are right! Why i bought DCS modules when i font have the most important thing in the battlefield How do you think the soviets shoot down the U-2 spy jet? he fliped the bird and then the sam detected him Im gonna go to ED office and say to the CEO straight in the eyes. I WANT MY MONEY BACK! Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
  23. Well its good that i have my trustee 37mm canon that can take someone down in one shoot :) Yea the .50 in this game are really underpowered i can tell because im the one that getting shoot at and i see the amount of bullets that someone spend and its way too much Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
  24. I think that it will be unfair for F-86 pilots they will lose all the advantage radar missile's engine that you can see ftom km's away (afterburner in the 17) (kidding) But it depends which varient of the 17 if its the A so its not a big change If its the latest it can even have radar RWR and option for rockets and option for R3S As a mig 15 pilot i want to crush sabers even more hard but i know its just not fair and i would kill myself for buying the 15 and not the 17 Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
×
×
  • Create New...