Excelsior

I too am beginning to understand, but with the reason why Vista is getting a bad name. A competent person following the correct installation procedure suffers little or, in some cases, no problems whatsoever.

:yawn: Hope you get it sorted Kaz. There is a sound bug (IIRC XP/X-Fi cards suffered from that also) but apart for that you should be ok.

Yeah, I see a lot of people play that game where they take people out of context. Twisting it to their own agenda. Read my post again... slowly this time.... because I don't think you got it right the first time. If you were around MP pre/post 1.1 you wouldn't say that it was careless. Hardcoding weapons was at request from the MP community who was sick to death of being splashed by a Mica carrying MiG-29A. Just as I did then, I still applaud ED for doing this. Less modability = Less X-wings, Tie fighters and sharks with frickin laserbeams in the Lockon world. Now where do I list texture or model replacement as an evil thing. The subject I was speaking of was Boberro umbrage with hard coded weapons. To put other words in my mouth is insulting. To answer your question. Yes I have some mods installed, all are made by ED partners or welcomed by the whole Lock-On community such as walmis. Is such mods in the hands of trusted people good = yes. I have no mods with alter what little realism we have atm, e.g. R-77 able Su-27S/Su-33 or AIM-54 carrying F-15s.

If you were around MP pre/post 1.1 you wouldn't say that it was careless. Hardcoding weapons was at request from the MP community who was sick to death of being splashed by a Mica carrying MiG-29A. Just as I did then, I still applaud ED for doing this. Less modability = Less X-wings, Tie fighters and sharks with frickin laserbeams in the Lockon world.

No the KC-45 is being produced jointly by Northrop-Grumman & European Aeronautic Defence and Space Company (EADS). Assembly of the KC-45 will take place in in Mobile, Alabama but production of parts will take place largely in Europe. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/7272358.stm http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/7272272.stm

Yes, congratulations. It was the Shorts Belfast C1, killed off by a clause in the IMF loan to save the pound in the sterling crisis, forcing the RAF to take the C-130 Herc instead of this very capable and much better aircraft.

OMG, well if you want to act all childish like this then chalk one up on you Forum phallus. Must be fun being so perfect. I was sure of 2 and IIRC'ed (but didn't) on the third.... big woop.

Obviously, as I said earlier, I didn't remember correctly but it was dumbed down.

Politics killed the R-27AE off when it was in the prototype stage. Rumours are that China made copies of it but no solid evidence of it, just a few pics of a R-27 type missile with radome covers on it but who knows what type of seeker, or what shape of radome :smilewink: is under there.

Yep, knew the AIM-54 was dumbed down but for some reason thought it was 1 like the AE. 5G for the R-33 seems right too. I saw a thread over in the russian part a few days ago, someone wanting to know why the Su-33 didn't have the R-33 and wanting some info on the R-37, he was told by one of the devs that it was limited to 1G and it had short legs. Can't find the thread now but still looking. I tried the R-37 earlier and it seem like 20kms or so it drastically slows down then self destructs.

Right, it's been a few hours so another clue is in order. This aircraft was killed off with only a few build by the usual culprit..... Politics. It was replaced by an aircraft with half the range and half the payload capacity just to save the value of a currency. One example is still flying, another is under restoration by the same company to join her sister and one more is a museum piece. The rest were scrapped. :cry:

You just revived a 3 year old thread. lol Back then the best PC couldn't run on high. BTW what is your system config?

Name that plane. :)

Boeing YC-14

Are you a Apache engineer or pilot? http://forums.eagle.ru/search.php?searchid=716608

Same here

Personally I would go with the GTS 512 GTX - GTS 512 575Mhz vs 650Mhz core 1800Mhz vs 1944Mhz memory 1350Mhz vs 1625Mhz Shader 36.8b vs 41.6b Fill rate G90 chip vs G92 chip

Is Developer testimony good enough for you? http://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=120553&postcount=25 I'll post the R-37 and AIM-54 posts when I get them. They are over in the Russian forums and pretty trick to find if you are an english speaker. A few sample missions showed that the EA is indeed limited to 1G with the R-37 @ 1.6g

No, you did nothing wrong. The R-37, R-27AE and IIRC the AIM-54C have been limited to 1G manoeuvres to stop people using Lope to cheat on-line.

QFT. :thumbup: Some people wish to see their own countries airforce able to fly anywhere they wish yet get all up themselves when Russia wishes to fly within international airspace. Double standards indeed. Way to go RuAF. :clap: Time to cast out the demons of the 90's, with fuel and flight hour shortages.

169.25 does not give me any problems. These problems can also occur if you Alt-Tab from Lock-on.

Totally agree. I went from a 32" 1080p HDTV to the 27" 2707WFP and the increase of quality is remarkable. Also you have to remember that a 1080 HDTV states that it shows 1920×1080 but you loose some of this with overscan, real screen size is 1808x1016'ish.

+1 :thumbup:

There is a MiG-29 photoshop template on the main lockon.co.uk site. Look in the files/textures page.

StrikeMax stopped his version as ED are making the Su-27, MiG-29 and Su-25 in house. http://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=18484&page=31 http://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=24836