Jump to content

ChuckJäger

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    255

  • Joined

  • Last visited

2 Followers

About ChuckJäger

  • Birthday 01/21/1983

Personal Information

  • Flight Simulators
    DCS/FSX/Xplane
  • Location
    Hong Kong
  • Interests
    Guitar, photography, videography, flying
  • Occupation
    Corporate Pilot

Recent Profile Visitors

8436 profile views
  1. ChuckJäger
    Is there a world where this gets resolved and both parties continue working together? I seriously am worried that any module supplier at this stage could pull out effectively putting a shelf life on their products. To be constructive, the first module I ever purchased for DCS was the AV-8B Harrier while I was waiting for the F/A-18C. I really love that and the F-15E - I do not know if I'd be interested in using this product if those modules went away or were rendered obsolete with future updates unless there was a solid plan to replace them. All that is to say, if ED and RB cannot pave a path forward - I would hope, at the very least, that ED would have a plan to replace these very relevant modules in the sandbox in short order. I do hope for a positive outcome here - but as the days/months/years drag by, that feels more and more distant a possibility.
  2. ChuckJäger
    absolutely a change in resolution. It is actually wild to see in the module - it's kind of a game changer for me. I loved that. The other thing the strike eagle did that I don't know that I've seen elsewhere was the recorded Target Pod. That module had so much promise - my only hope is that RB and ED figure this out, or at the very least - figure out a way for them to go their separate ways and allow ED to continue on with RB IP. I think the latter is a long shot at best though.
  3. ChuckJäger
    @Bignewy this is an example of the messaging that hasn't sat well with me. Of course the public were brought in to this - as they should have been a product that was in EA was/is in jeopardy of being discontinued due to, allegedly, nonpayment by company it was being developed for. This is alarming, full stop. Now that you have removed the products from the product page, I really feel as if a some sort of message is necessary from your legal team. I am really beginning to wonder if the 56 licenses I hold in your store are sound. Since 2018 - ED or it's partners posts something for early release, I am generally there on day one- that is not the case anymore... this is absolutely going to effect your business short of some sort of clear understanding for your customers. I am really not one of those bitter keyboard warriors - looking through my post history hopefully says that... I am just very, very, very concerned.
  4. ChuckJäger
    With the script, could you have it play a sound file of a thud? As a pilot, it is quite possible to have a bird strike and not even realize it. If it went in the engine, you'd absolutely know it though...
  5. ChuckJäger
    @NineLine The constant comments about how you can't/will not make public statements to your customers as this is a legal matter isn't sitting well with me. You have repeatedly said it... the reason it doesn't sit well is, it is not because you can't do it, it's because you won't do it. You could ask your legal team to draft update(s) that would inform the people that have paid for these modules. It REALLY feels like the lack of information from ED is a conscious management decision in the hopes that this will just go away as ED continues to bring features and new modules. It feels dishonest. Giving ED the benefit of the doubt, I'm sure that is not the intent. This has been going on for over a year now with not even a shred of hope for resolution for the people that enjoy both Razbam's and ED's modules. My hope is that the two legal teams can get together and provide an update and outline a path forward for the people that have invested their hard earned dollars to enjoy these modules. A good resolution is only going to make this community stronger.
  6. ChuckJäger
    LOVE IT when someone bumps a KC-10 thread.
  7. ChuckJäger
    Really hope the comments from Prowler are a sign of good things to come. I love the F-15E and I am so hopeful it ends up being a finished product. The Harrier is such a great aircraft too. Healthy Developer/ED relationships really make this community grow! It's nice to finally see something optimistic!
  8. ChuckJäger
    Bump
  9. ChuckJäger
    that did it! Thank you!
  10. ChuckJäger
    Man This is awesome! I cannot load them though - I may be doing something wrong. Your first round of templates worked great for me - but when I load these it will not allow me to save the mission (saves as 0kb) or let me in to "fly mission" in the ME. I've tried different variations of missions, to include new missions entirely, and nothing works. I've even gone and deleted outposts one by one - getting rid of them all and it doesn't fix it. What could I be doing wrong?
  11. ChuckJäger
    It would be so cool to have some strike/cas missions that originate off of a carrier in the North Arabian Sea now that they've expanded the map out that far. I did a test run yesterday and at high altitude you barely notice the undeveloped part of the map... it looks convincing for being over the Desert. I am trying to put something together myself but mission building is not my expertise...
  12. ChuckJäger started following CTD with Iraq
  13. ChuckJäger
    Hello - I just purchased Iraq and I cannot run it. It loads (both CH47 and AH64D aircraft) and then immediately crashes to desktop both on multiplayer and SP instant action missions. I was waiting for it to be a little further along but after a few youtube videos I figured I'd give it a go, now I'm wondering if that was the right decision. dcs.log-20250110-171615.zip dcs.log-20250110-172034.zip dcs.log-20250110-172322.zip dcs.log-20250110-172820.zip
  14. ChuckJäger
    +1000000
  15. ChuckJäger
    I feel like it may be time to wait, I have pre-purchased almost every ED module - After the drama and the game of brinkmanship that's been played with my money between ED and the other developer, I just don't feel comfortable investing more until I see more in the way of ensuring that my investment will be sound in the future. I love ED, ED's product and the capabilities we have with it - I am very, very excited to see where it goes.. but after more than 15 years of using this sim, I am worried given the last year. I know I'll get called a troll, I'd invite anyone who thinks so to read my other posts on this forum. I usually feel like it's best to keep my opinion to myself but the silence here has been deafening.
  16. ChuckJäger
    this thread is going a bit bananas and missing the point. At the end of the day the community needs some reassurance from RB and ED that this matter is moving toward a resolution, end of the story.
×
×
  • Create New...