shaHeen-1

For release?

its gna be a glorious couple of months lol. People gna tell their kids JF17 was 5th gen aircraft XD

to be fair, the AG radar host aircraft is also not driven by a crop duster farmer who just read chuck's guide before jumping in.

you mean all of RedFor? :lol:

@loopback any chance you guys could look into this and help it become cleaner and more effective. It'll be a really nice touch. Also maybe add support for smaller screens?

Holy F***, and here I was looking at voice attack and giving my voice data to microsoft for free to save some buttons and axes.

Technically the 4th planes still see each other. Except it's through the radar or the plane Facebook.

Why would I when I like everything in one place and managing modules is easier on steam in addition to other tools.

Tbh it's quite amazing deka managed a full module without general public testing data. That's a great advantage of early access to developers. They get plenty of testing data and obscure bugs get picked up. It's easier to fix a single subsystem as it is being developed instead of trying to fix everything at the end when most design decisions have already been set in stone.

I don't think their end of the world matters. It's Ed that's gna be releasing the module and for us steam peasants, the update will be even later when steam updates daily.

I don't even know why this is a debate. Just put in what you know from real data. End of discussion.

LOL forgot the Ctrl+/ hammer?

Here's a cool tandem landing video I found: Hopefully its real.

That drag chute swings way too much. It should be more rigid but vibrate a bit more right?

Even if it makes the crew shit itself and run back to where it came from, thats effective....right? lol why am I even......pls just keep the rockets as they are. This is a flight combat sim right? who cares if the tanks suffer? amirite?

If this doesn't live up to hype then I don't know what will.

which players? wtf? the rockets are the best thing about this jet. KEEP 'EM!!! I even wanna try and use em in A2A for the lols.

This seems like the test probe. The one actually put on looks a lot like the mirage's

LOL I was just about to post it

also its a plane firing rockets. it could very well wreck face if it lands from up high, without warning.

S530(Fox-1) has what? 10 nm range? And there's only two of those. This gets 4 Fox3s with 20+ range and it can engage multiple. id say they're not even in the same league at the moment.

JF-17 was designed for Pakistan's needs and a nearly absurd amount of modularity in mind. Which just so happens coincides with the needs of a lot of other countries other than China looking for affordable, easy to maintain jets. Its not a bad idea considering dollar for dollar, you'll have 3 flights of two JF-17 vs 1 flight of two F16 for the same cost. Also IIRC the plane was supposed to be called F-17 but they decided to honor the collaboration by calling it Joint Fighter 17 instead. China can simply afford to spend a lot of cash into more specialized, expensive planes in large enough numbers that it doesn't really need the JF-17.

Price is expected to be 69.99 till end of year and 79.99 afterwards. Read above response from developer again and again until we become indoctrinated. :smartass:

Why does jf17 not have bubble canopy. Also what's that weird twisting rod thing around the canopy?

How did you do on the reading comprehension section of your SATs?