Ironhand

DUH!!! So do I. Just missed it somehow. So the answer to Kattern’s first question is that they are duplicates. It’s just a question of using an axis or a discrete key/button push for the control.

You have “RADAR” up/down and right/left under axis commands rather than “TDC”?

I’m confused. In my Controls section for the F-15C, under Axis, there is no option for either Radar Horizontal or Vertical, only TDC. If the same is true in yours, then TDC slew and Scan Zone Up, Down, and so on are two different things.

Thanks for returning and posting the solution you discovered. So many folks solve their problem and just disappear without a trace.

I imagine by now you’ve gotten this sorted out. But the reason to provide a short track when having issues is to allow anyone trying to help you (not just ED) see how the mission is set up, how your switches are set, your flight profile, etc. People can also open it in the ME, alter it, and experiment to see what works/doesn’t work.

It allows the Inertial Navigation System time to align. Otherwise you’ll have issues as Akiazusa noted above.

Cool link!

Ahhh….never thought to check the telelight panel. After 20+ years in FC aircraft, I stopped looking because the panel never told the full story. Thanks for the help.

I was able to spend some quality time with the MiG today. One of the ways I like to test my understanding of how systems integrate is to misalign the switches and predict what will happen. Everything happened as I expected except one--the new lines being drawn on the range scale as the range marker moved down. The setup: IRST is primary first searching, then capturing. The radar is set to Dummy with the Co-op switch up. I, however, left the radar mode in Average rather than Close Combat so that there would be no ranging. I've never seen what I saw on the range scale before. TRK file attached. MiG-29A Fulcrum R-27T WTF.trk

I imagine the odds of it happening will be directly proportional to the FF MiG-29 Fulcrum sales figures.

For years people complained that bombs were not sufficiently effective with no secondary blast effects. Now…

Took a look at the TRK file and also took control of it to play around a bit. In the image you posted, it turns out that the debris you see are ground textures. In experimenting with you track, I had to be above something like 850 m for them not to appear and not feel the blast effect. BTW, it's the same texture whether you were hitting ground or, in this case, the bridge.

In the Weapons section of Gameplay Bugs there have been a number of complaints about bomb damage radius (of a variety of bombs) being too large. Haven’t checked it out myself.

I don’t know the answer to what it was translated from. As for the page numbering, I doubt it. It’s an odd mixture of standard print and pages that are obviously enlarged photocopies of translated text and/or diagrams.