CajunJosh

You aren't the only one. I'd pay a lot more than $60-$100 bucks for the module if it would light a fire under their asses to give the rotor wing fans more options.

I'm definitely excited for the future of performance improvements with regards to dedicated servers, the switch to vulcan and the eventual utilization of more CPU cores. Right now I'm running a fairly robust system with a 2080 Ti card overclocked by about 172mhz, a Ryzen 7 1800x overclocked to 4ghz on all 8 cores, 32gb of 2400mhz memory. GPU & CPU are water cooled by a hefty dual 480mm x 60mm radiator setup. Game is run off a Sandisk X400 M.2 SSD. On some servers like the Acrobatics server flying in a Huey is pure butter with great frame rates in VR. When I go to other servers like Through The Inferno that have a lot more assets running and players connected DCS performance starts to slide backwards. At times things can get so choppy around busy airports for whatever reason it starts to remind me of the old Flight Sim 95 and 98 days. Knowing that other than a memory upgrade and overclock I'm throwing more than a reasonable amount of hardware horse power at DCS and still seeing lack luster performance lets me know there is a LOT of performance they can unlock with work to the code. How difficult or time consuming that task isn't my concern but I'll be patiently, eagerly and excitingly awaiting core engine performance improvement.

Maybe I'm the only one but I really hope the Mi24 gets here sooner than later so they can move onto the next helo modules. I'm sure the Mi24 will b ea great helicopter to fly and I'm looking forward to learning it but I would love to know what's next after the Mi24 and hope we might someday see a Cobra or some other twin engine american helicopter like the Seahawk.

The exciting thing there is to look at the core usage bar graphs at the bottom left. With so many running 8+ core CPUs now a days it will be exciting to see how much improvement we see when all available cores are working together on DCS as apposed to just one getting pegged out all the time while the other sit nearly idle.

Where was this confirmed? I don't see anything on the forum, Facebook or Twitter pages.

I would buy two.

Wheel Stand Pro makes a nice setup. Not the cheapest thing out there but I use it with the stick positioned between my legs and it makes for a comfortable setup while flying in VR. https://www.amazon.com/Wheel-Stand-Pro-Thrustmaster-throttles/dp/B01NAN0SF3 This company also makes some high quality mounts, again pricey but probably the last mounts you would ever buy. https://www.monstertech.de/en/product/joystick-hotas-table-mount/

Not sure about the Mk82y but I can say the Mk20 Rockeye is much improved!

Changes haven't been made to how bore sight or vertical scan work have they, I didn't notice any change there. As for obtaining and holding locks thanks for the hard work, much more enjoyable to fly now!

More of a question than suggestion. One of my biggest challenges when flying around in an A10 or Harrier is trying to orient the POD system when I'm flying an orbit and can't see the convenient TPOD indicator on the forward HUD. Once we get the helmet in the F18 will it display on the HUD some sort of icon to indicate where the ATFLIR pod is currently looking?

AH-1Y Viper first choice. FA-18c out of what's in the list.

How amazing a multi crew Sikorsky Blackhawk would be... The ability to have munitions for the pilot to use while potentially carrying around two NPC or human door gunners and still have the ability to quickly switch over to troop transport or medivac. I'd pay good money for a module like that. I really hope they don't invest a lot of time or effort into the BA105. I feel like that won't get them the best ROI from consumers.