Delta59R

Haha! Really? Where did you read that?

So Tom was talking with two Major Generals.. https://archive.is/20121212214752/http://www.af.mil/information/bios/bio.asp?bioID=7886 Major General McCasland- supposedly said.."We found a life form. And everything that we did and every decision that we made with that life form was because of the consciousness at that time." And https://www.af.mil/About-Us/Biographies/Display/Article/108381/major-general-michael-j-carey/ Major General Michael Carey - Decided to do an endorsement on the back of one of Tom's books (Sekret Machines) You know... typical Major General stuff

Tom DeLonge- "I have meet very very very high ranking Intelligence officials that have had direct encounters" ….. "Yeah there's actually some really unnerving aspects for example there's one program where there's hundreds of operatives that have been having contact"

Thanks for the input guys.

What were you using before?

Hey Guys I'm in the market for my first set of pedals! Iv been flying twist stick since the late 90s... LOL I'm currently looking real hard at the Thrustmaster TPR and Slaw RX V2 Any advice or other recommendations? THANKS

So the Navy has submitted anti gravity craft patents..??.. https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/28729/docs-show-navy-got-ufo-patent-granted-by-warning-of-similar-chinese-tech-advances

@Karon, were the targets using chaff in any of the tests? Naquaii commented that it was a factor with the A vs C. "numbers for counter measure rejection"

Now I know this is longer than 2min but its a good lecture by Harold E. Puthoff, AATIP and Metamaterials are a few of the things discussed. And a good read if that's not enough, https://publicintelligence.net/dia-advanced-space-propulsion/

Well the way I read the comments, I would say yes. Hopefully we hear from Naquaii in this thread to remove all doubt?

Maybe someone has and its nothing special OORRR it IS a UFO base and the dive team was all neuralyzed!

Cool!

It looks like your cpu is able to mostly keep up with your 1080 so I would say a gfx card upgrade would net you the most frame rate improvement. For reference I down clocked my 8700k to 4.4 and it was not holding back my 2080ti at all and I further down clocked it to 4.0 and it made a very little difference. I posted the results in another thread. MP servers might be more taxing on the cpu but I still would think gpu is the way to go for you.

More on the metamaterials

So I found these two posts by Naquaii, apparently the "C" Does have better seeker performance over the "A"

Congressman Mark Walker- "We need to know what this is"

Hmmmmm....

Hey, the two cards tested both at stock clocks were; EVGA SC2 1080ti 11G-P4-6593KR And EVGA XC Ultra 2080ti 11G-P4-2383-KR I sold the 1080ti to a fellow simmer for 450.00 and purchased the 2080ti from newegg for 1109.00, came with 2 games ill probably never play.

Well after adding 2xAA and 8xAF GPU usage is about pegged at 99% like the 1080ti was. Just before I was noticing that it was very close and sometimes very quickly flashing 90fps and that might have been what was keeping it back. I think even though FRAPS didn't catch it (it only saw 88fps) the GPU was momentarily hitting the 90fps cap of the O+. I might have found a few more % increase if it were not for that. So maybe a more realistic improvement over the 1080ti is 27 or 28%?

Updated, 26% not a bad improvement! I think my cpu is holding the 2080ti back a tiny bit as its not pegged at 99/100% like the 1080ti was, its closer to 97/98%. But maybe I just need to crank up the setting a bit to take advantage of that last bit, IDK. More testing to do.

Added

I will be testing the performance of DCS with the O+ over the next week as time allows and uploading the results on this OP. I will be using a path that I fly through downtown Dubi in a F-14B recording the min/max/avg FPS for 2 minutes. Below are the configurations I plan to test using the following hardware 8700k/2080ti/1080ti/32g ddr4. If anyone would like to see a different configuration let me know or forever hold your peace as I will be selling the 1080ti soon. I will also upload a screenshot of settings used for reference. Suggestions or questions are welcome. -CPUghz/GPU/RAMs&t-min/max/avg -5.0/2080ti/4000c18- 71/88/78.09 -5.0/2080ti/3600c16- 70/87/77.98 -5.0/2080ti/3200c15- 72/86/78.32 -5.0/2080ti/2400c14- 68/86/75.72 -5.0/2080ti/4000c18- 71/88/78.09 -4.4/2080ti/4000c18- 70/84/77.63 -4.0/2080ti/4000c18- 66/86/75.65 -5.0/1080ti/4000c18- 55/69/62.19 -4.4/1080ti/4000c18- 56/68/62.37 -4.0/1080ti/4000c18- 49/65/58.20 -4.4/1080ti/3200c15- 55/69/62.06 -4.0/1080ti/2400c14- 48/65/56.43

Yeah, that test and the cinebench r20 test favor the AMD chips while cupz and cinebench r15 favor intel. I'm not sure how much it matters though as I did tests in another thread at 4.4ghz and 5.0ghz with my 8700k and saw no difference with a 1080ti. Maybe other factors to consider like multiplayer, how much of a impact?, IDK it would be hard to test with consistency.

This is interesting, I am about to update the bios on my MB so I loaded the "optimized defaults" then decided to test again. The CPU looks to be running at 4.3ghz and the ram is at 2133 c15. I think the ram speed created the bottleneck in this test. Frames, Time (ms), Min, Max, Avg 3230, 60000, 49, 58, 53.833

Using FRAPS I recorded the FPS for 60 seconds, trying to keep the flight path as close as possible each time flying Downtown Dubi, here were the results. 5.0ghz Frames, Time (ms), Min, Max, Avg 3614, 60000, 56, 65, 60.233 4.4ghz Frames, Time (ms), Min, Max, Avg 3636, 60000, 56, 65, 60.600 4.0ghz Frames, Time (ms), Min, Max, Avg 3509, 60000, 54, 63, 58.483