DerwischGER

There was some change a couple of updates ago. Just delete the binding, quit and restart DCS and rebind the throttle. That should work.

I finally got through the mission without it crashing to desktop. What I did was to open the mission in the Mission Editor and save it (without changing anything). After that I could play past the point where the demolition charges are exploded.

I get a consistent repeatable crash to desktop at exactly the same moment in the mission. It always crashes when Ghost is announcing the explosion of the bridge demolition charges right when he gives me the "Cleared Hot". I used the extended logging autoexec.cfg for my last try, but whould prefer to send the resulting dcs.log/*.zip via DM directly to one of the moderators, in case there is some sensitive directory information inside I did miss while skimming the files. Edit: Oh, and I use the A-10C II version as can be found in this forum.

When flying mission 02, I can hear Prowler pretty well, but whenever Overlord speaks, I only hear static and only once got text to even know what I was supposed to do. This reminds me pretty much of the Iron Flag campaign, where I had the same problem from time to time.

I remember that for some a couple of patches ago, Easy Comms was activated again. If you can talk to the Chief, that could mean the selector dial gets set to INT and never turns back to VHF. Maybe check for Easy Comms in game settings and take a look at the dial (left console, back) when in cockpit and trying to communicate...

Ah...yes, of cause. How embarrassing! Are you still having that problem? Because I was flying the II a lot recently and it was always where it is supposed to be - next to A-A where it says Test in the Guide picture.

Are you sure you're flying the A-10C II(!) and not the A-10C? Because I'm not sure, but since I don't see the radio information in the HUD, I would thing it is the legacy version. I might be wrong, of cause.

Yeah, seems about right. I think I should consider myself corrected on this one.

I was talking about like here in around 5:20, for example. But to be honest, it's pretty hard to tell - especially if you don't know what the pilot is doing at the time. So maybe, it is absolutely as accurate as in-game...was just asking for opinions...

First things first, I'm loving this module to death. It's pure fun. But one thing bothers me: Watching videos online of the .50 cal firing, the gun itself is massively shaking and impact pattern correspond to that by looking more like shotgun hits rather than the razorcut lines we now see in game. With a little practice, I'd surely be able to write my own name. Am I the only one who thinks that may not be what can be found in live footage?

Just in case someone finds this thread looking for a solution: I had exactly the same problem - AIM9 and HARMs going off in pairs or even triples. Had stick, throttle and pedals plugged into an USB hub, mostly for ease of setup/storage. First solution I tried was using a different hub, which did not solve the issue. What did solve the issue was pluging the stick into a dedicated USB port, front panel one in my case. Since then the issue is gone - I waited a couple of days and sorties before posting here to be absolutely sure. As I understand it, there may be some hub-like ports even on a mainboard proper, so even if the first port does not solve your issues, try a different one, maybe.

"Tornado being mentioned!"->Me jumping up and having a moment of ecstasy! "It's AI only!"->Me going into a deep depression! ;-)

I was hoping for more for my beloved Viggen, but then some progress is better than no progress. Good job and thank you for keeping improving this fine module!

Clearly the Change Log for HB fixes was simply too long to be included. Please find a way to post it here!

I for one couldn't couldn't agree more. The Viggen is one of my absolute favorite and I can clearly see that a lot of love went into it. So count me into the happy :cheer3nc:camp!

I know. That's why I said "the REALLY advanced stuff". I just wanted to make sure he doesn't consider stuff like TERNAV to be part of a late 60s plane. The stuff you listed...pretty advanced for 1967...stuff like TERNAV...not possible without alien tech...but then again this beauty of a plane, as I said, obviously does half of the pilot's job when others still needed a crew of two... :-)

I'm with you on almost everything you said but just wanted to make sure you realize that most of the really advanced stuff is part of the mid-90s AJS upgrade, not late 60s tech. That said, this plane is still my most favorite because it appears they thought about everything to make the pilot's workload as easy as possible while keeping the aircraft capable as hell. I love it!

No! That's nozzlebreaking! :lol:

Or could it be that you're playing on a laptop and the game is somehow using the integrated graphic chip while it used the dedicated before?

You might want to check this out: https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=215887 Edit: See page 2!

Thanks for PM. Looking up for meeting you in the skies!

I'd love to join! This is exactly what I am looking for. Since I am from the east side of the pond, I'm not even sure if I can attend this often, but would love to hang out in discord with you and jump into a cockpit whenever time allows. So I hereby apply! ;-)

Thank you so very much! The "fun" in F5 is back again!:pilotfly:

Have tried it: Still nearly opaque hud and stars & stripes for a radar...:cry:

A10C