Ravenus

Incredible simulation and release. (I can´t recall a better release feature wise in DCS history). However I do think more optimization is needed. Heavy missions are unplayable for me. I am on the lower en regarding CPU, but I don´t have issue with other jets in DCS. THe performance drop is significantly lower compared with other jets. Tried special tab simulation reduction and messing with the affinity cores. Affinity helps a tad bad but not much. I hope this is improved.

Are there any plans to expand south to tel aviv and including bases like Tel Nof?

Holy Sh*t. This works!

please tell me this ain´t dead

I´m in the same boat. Nothing has worked. The only difference with my specs is I have a RTX 2060

Thank you for clarification !

Has it been included in the OB? I haven´t seen it in the patch notes.

What is the source of this? Could you redirect me in DM if needed?

i´M both for the F-105 to help complete the Vietnam war scenario and the F-84E/F/G to help the Korean war. Maybe more biased towards the F-84 as with it, along with the F86,mig 15, corsair, skyraider, la-7( close to la-9) we would have a pretty complete theatre.

I believe you have fooled around with this mod, so you can tell me what happens when you attack a combat box of B-29s, even when its on "passive defence". That´s right, its a nicely made model but they don´t behave like b-29s.

When is this going to be fixed? Are we going to wait another 4 years like the aileron lock-up bug for the F86?

The group that I´m part of just hosted Korea themed mission. We used A20s but they just don´t make the cut. A b-29 that isn´t locked by the asset pack would get a lot more ppl in the Forgotten war theatre and add substantially to the eco-system. Please.

can´t wait

My vote would be Korea Vietnam Sinai Peninsula, including parts of the nile delta, Cairo and southern israel ( Six day war, war of attrition, Yom kippur...)

What is this talk about the F4E spanking the mig 23 ML in WVR? There is some huge misconceptions about the reality of the ML's capabilities. The Mig had better turning capability, depending on which wing sweep was used. The evaluation testing in cope peg etc.. were done at the recommended 45º angle. At the 16º sweep and below a certain speed, the mig spanks the F4. Furthermore, the testing was made on the previous unreliable versions, M, MS etc. The big caveat to all of this is how fast the wings could switch from one sweep angle to another and how ergonomical it would be in a dogfight scenario (which I don´t know) I suggest looking at this comparative report : Compared Air Combat Performances Mig-23ML versus F-4E by Topolo. Not 100% accurate but in the ball park. It´s a treat EDIT : I just saw G.J.S. post on his real life experience. Interesting insight on how vis and handling hindered the on paper performance potential of the ML