Jump to content

USAFMTL

Members
  • Posts

    972
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Everything posted by USAFMTL

  1. I have flown the "other" aircraft and the F-15C is the best. Despite it being assjacked.....its much more fun than the Su-27. The Mig-29 is much more fun than the 27. The Su-33 is a waste of an aircraft.
  2. Cali is on point. If you cant see that then you don't read history. Now if you're complaining about the F-15 in FC:2 then you are right, its has no balls. But all the Flankerwhiners will not admit that if the F-15 was not neutered, their ass would be in a world of crap. Period, jock them all you want... the record speaks for itself. Again Period.....
  3. Oh dear god.....someone put a bell on him..... j/k
  4. FC4: The Search for More SU-25T's...... no?
  5. Well think about it, it would be cool as hell to export the Albinos displays.
  6. I was hoping we could just get Vikhrs and no SU-25's..... :D Well I can dream cant I?
  7. That is SO weird, because I would sell your grandmother for it too. :D Good post though, that would be an awesome thing to have.
  8. I wonder if it will be possible in FC3 to export some of the displays using the same method as A-10C? Any of the testers know?
  9. Or we will get FC4: The Search for More Money..... lol
  10. USAFMTL

    Hey Ron

    Check your PM at CA when you get a chance. Thanks bro.
  11. Are we there yet? Are we there yet?
  12. disregard
  13. Nice work Ron.....
  14. Nice preview and the F-15 look outdamnstanding.
  15. Oh I know he wasnt complaining Pyro. Some people just do not know the process, so I was just giving an example.
  16. Thats a nice render.
  17. Kuky I can tell you from experience that new quality models take time. Team Viper (The team I'm on) took almost 2 years to make the C model Vipers to include pits for each Block. We ended up with every C model made and all the Euro MLU ones. I did 70 different skins covering USAF, USAFR and ANG. So it takes lots and lots of time. Maybe one of the 3rd party SU-27's out there can be ported over to DCS by the person who made it. post-230-0-05571200-1336844280.jpg
  18. True GG. I'm not sure how much I can say without going into the grey area of classified info. All I can say (until I hear from request I put into NASIC) is that the missile should be more lethal and have a higher PK.
  19. From my experience I have a few times seen just a little chaff in the air and it goes stupid. Manuevering can defeat it in certain aspect ratios but again beaming one is not easy. I have seen too where a person just spun and spun and it went stupid. The Slammer C and C-5 has ECCCM so fooling it is damn near impossible. I just can't see a scenario where after launching 4 C fido's, they A: never get to a target when it's well in its range or B: go stupid 15 to 20 seconds after launch. They are just broke.
  20. Good point. Has the misslie tracking been fixed? AIM-120C is the best out there and it shouldnt be fooled as bad as it does in FC2.
  21. Deadman I get a large check at the end of the month, is it possible to still order? Or should I wait?
  22. Well this sucks! I was hoping we would have to think in Russian..... j/k
  23. Well its all working, and here is why....when testing, start airborne, that way the displays will be on. Im such a dope....
  24. Ok I got the clock to show too but after that, nada. Anyone have any ideas? ED_A10C_LEFT_MFCD = { x = 1980; y = 600; width = 410; height = 410; } ED_A10C_RIGHT_MFCD = { x = 3370; y = 600; width = 410; height = 410; } ED_A10C_CDU = { x = 3370; y = 100; width = 410; height = 410; } ED_A10C_CLOCK = { x = 2500; y = 600; width = 400; height = 400; } ED_A10C_RWR = { x = 2500; y = 100; width = 300; height = 300; } ED_A10C_CMSP = { x = 1100; y = 0; width = 300; height = 300; }
×
×
  • Create New...