The Falcon

I already knew him but thanks for sharing it. That man did a really good job. I wonder how he managed to get the power to the monitor ect... :huh:

Ma è ancora in vigore questa regola?

On the other hand I find the voice of the alarm system funny, in particular when she says "warning", it reminds me of those erotic pop-up advertisements :D

But his assertion remains more than current unfortunately

Dammit two years later :doh:

Yep the current F-16 wing flex is pure art

absolutely negative, not all humans follow the rules, there is no realism in the community, many play as if it were war thunder:lol:

#ibelieveinDCS3.0 :weight_lift:

I really hope it's more than a 20 ％

Nice news :)

I hope they will complete it soon because i still don't have it

They need DCS to simulate well ;)

Windows... :hehe:

+1 I'm starting to think they ignore us :(

I would have liked to have this dual engine, too bad the vote is closed

+1

The job of a pro :thumbup:

For me there is definitely a problem. From mach 1.35 onwards it is as if DCS F-16 had this curve It would be very useful if we could do the same experiment with another aircraft, like mig29-su27

I was honestly thinking of something like jet streams, but in truth I don't know enough

In fact the videos were practically the same until the F-16 of the original video passed 37000 feet where it started to accelerate much faster than before.

yes but this only if you have to increase or decrease the temperature in a realistic way, for example if to match the video you have to put a big difference of temp like 40 °c at 30k feet, then there is a problem either in DCS or in FM

Yep like there was a wall, while in the original video the mach number was constantly growing, it is as if there is too much drag or lack of thrust, perhaps the cause is the different engine.

I really don't know, i'm waiting for the help of someone who knows. This external air temperature thing is just to test and confirm that there is a problem anyway.

From the video we understand that you were slightly slower in accelerating and it was as if there was a wall starting from mach 1.85 onwards, I remain of the opinion that neither the AoA nor the G can make the difference. To tell the truth you were also a little out of the altitude compared to the original video. For me without knowing the external air temperature we can't go on.

I think the outside air temperature changes the mach number, so if you can try to lower it and then see what happens