Jump to content

-orlok-

Members
  • Posts

    14
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by -orlok-

  1. can you enlarge on this? I dont follow? is not the IP thing a seperate issue?
  2. we also need to bear in mind that some posters may not exactly be acting in good faith. it *does* seem, to me, to be a very messy and unfortunate situation but any "unofficial news" I'm going to take with a pinch of salt even if from a "trusted" source because I simply don't have a full 360 knowledge of what *all* the facts are. that's not to say any/all leaks are false or untrue but they're only a segment of a far greater picture. mix all this with a few folks who might be pre disposed towards or against one or both parties and things can really get out of hand. its a horrid, unfortunate mess, trust has been lost for some and for others a seemingly last straw. me? I'm keeping my tentacles crossed for an amicable solution. DCS is a weird dysfunctional soup of a sim, but it's a dysfunctional soup of a sim I get a lot of pleasure out of. I want to see it become the sim it could/can be.
  3. that's really good news, thank you!
  4. I'd also like to know if we ever managed to mount live weapons on this. I need some old fashioned Hawk flying.
  5. I think we. as end users, forget the risks of EA, stuff can change, be added to or removed. It's not just a way to get acess to cool stuff quick. that said, there's been a definite misstep in communications and it hasn't helped that "other things" have recently occurred in the DCS space. we know there's an ongoing issue (afaik) between the map makers and rightly or wrongly ED were unaware of the issue. Let's keep on communicating to all parties that we'd like to see the removed content returned but let's not get too angry until we have all the facts as discussions are ongoing.
  6. can any one explain why maps covering part of the same area would cause issues? is it purely down to "we want folk to buy our map if the fly over landmass X and we did it first" or something deeper, technical etc?
  7. if we roll back DCS will the content be restored? Or is it seperate to that process?
  8. ah, ok, so it's not just me and my incompetence! I can throw the aircraft around and land on a penny, so I found it odd that I can't engage the AP without weird inputs. DCS and it's peculiarities!
  9. I'm current fighting this issue. I get near stable, the auto hover kicks in and the AP dials go crazy. if I correct I fallout of AP, if I'm hands off, I fall out of AP. There's a definite "jerk" as it kicks in and the airframe soon drifts out of AP. I'm assuming it's pilot error but I'd like to be sure!
  10. i seem to remember a hoped for implementation of George (?) AI was on the "would be nice to do but in no way confirmed" list, have we had any further info about it?
  11. Had DCS for decades but only realised this was a thing (even if id seen it my brain didnt take it in) but ensure any slidey axis are set as sliders.
  12. id like to know this as well. PLUS, othaer than using the editor can we manually add modded airfcraft (oh-a6 in my case) to the aircraft selection?
  13. Ive also noted this in the su 33 I recently changed my setting to "match my stick" ill try to change that and feedback to you.
  14. hello there Very excited about this one since losing my other Hawk. Good luck with it! Rgds LoK
×
×
  • Create New...