Jump to content

cronustr75

Members
  • Posts

    89
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by cronustr75

  1. This optimization guide for laptop users; https://youtu.be/20jxZvX0oM0
  2. Here I prepared a video at my channel for Nvidia; And for AMD; Hope these helps...
  3. When you stress your hw over its limits, all the features driven by sw drivers may result a big mess. Now I'm working on AMD RX 5700XT to prepare a video for AMD and I see thats to a point it works quiet good but after that everything is troubled. Thats why Nvidia limited the feature for some series of cards but it needs optimization and maybe, it will always like this. Game engine creates the stress on hw and it is very important. On some games, this feature works like a charm. Here it works for poerful hw quiet good but not for medium to light weight hw.
  4. You can not please everyone, whatever you do. Many people thanked me about the video. It'll be better in time.
  5. Some Reverb users reported it too. Thats anot issue with vr sets I think cause there are benchmarks in video for monitors and it is better. I'll investigate it. Waiting for my Reverb G2.
  6. PUMP UP Your DCS! HELPS TO SOLVE DCS VIDEO STUTTERS and FPS DROPS - POINT BLANK Hi guys, This is another video from my Optimization Guide video and about a special Windows feature and setting. PLEASE SUBSCRIBE FOR LATER VIDEOS!
  7. First version was a longer 34 minutes one explaining every single setting. Nobody watched, everyone explained how long it is. So, 99% of the people are requesting the result not the explanation. Please subscribe to my channel for upcoming videos, I'm very happy you watched and gave your feedback. Thank you!
  8. Thank you. In fact it covers the info about VR specigic settings and all the settings also effects for VR feed. Please subscribe for later updates.
  9. I've prepared this guide for my Youtube Channel "POINT BLANK" and tested all the settings with latest drivers one by one to see the effects on fps and stutter. Don't forget we can make it better and better with feedbacks. I've got so many up to date and worked on it.:) So many positive feedback received from facebook groups and youtube and I wanted to share this video here. I've worked hard on it, in fact it is the second version and I'll upgrade and continue the series with DCS updates and major changes to the Nvidia drivers. PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO THE CHANNEL NOT TO MISS THE UPCOMING VERSIONS.:thumbup: V.2 for DCS 2.5.6; FOR AMD DRIVERS and GPUS;
  10. It seems there is cause at the youtube review videos, some screen shots show f/a-18 grip button assignation and pictures.
  11. I have warthog base fw version 12. Installed f/a-18 grip but not recognized as f/a-18 in target, same old picture of warthog joystick. Uninstalled drivers, updated target but not sucess. removed usb ports, re-installed drivers and target. Picture changed to f/a-18 grip. opened dcs. It is working in DCS, buttons are ok in device manager, apart from recce switch and small roll switch all are assigned in f/a-18. But not recognized in settings as f/a-18 grip. closed dcs. Opened target again and it is again same old warthog picture. It is working in dcs. Not sure it is installed correctly.
  12. Spacebar is assigned to trigger second stage, but it does not work to continue.
  13. These sure will not be a 100% professionally correct cause I don’t know the platform sw structure. But my humble thoughts are based on the experience as a previous C++ software test&integration engineer on complex multifunctional service platforms and 23 years of IT experience. Before this latest update, Leatherneck announced new cabin textures and geometry corrections. As a Mig-21 enthusiast and DCS: Mig Sukhoi Redfor Pilots group admin I announced at the group. Many people updated. Cause I did know that it needs a very big overhaul and not working correctly. People messaged me about the problem at cabin textures not working at all. I feel responsible to them. Luckily I didnt have time to update for myself but I dont feel good about it. I’m pretty sure that Leatherneck tested it on the previus beta release on their hands but “their addition” should and will run on the latest package with other vendors’ contributions. What I mean is, they couldn’t test it on the real load and as always we see in “multi-contributed” platforms, probably different sw packs cracked each other. How I came to this conclusion? Cause it is very obvious that they (every vendor) do not want to release this patch with this broken state. I dont believe that Leatherneck wanted to release this update with this state, or the others. So WHY we face these problems. I’m guessing; 1. Maybe different module vendors does not want to give info or pack to each other to test because they do not have information security aggreements with each other for sw codes. So ED must test the package as a platform owner. 2. Or ED tests each pack individually and does not make functional sanity tests at latest package before release to see if the different packages effect each other or not. Of course they can not test all functions of all modules everytime but even the latest update list is not working when they come together as a release. 3. Or Even the vendors does not test throughly their own updates on their load of previous beta, cause almost all of us run on “beta”...But I dont think this might be true. 4. Or there is not a test procedure, test platform specs or anything about test standard. 5. Or SW platform is near to crack and bleeding from many points and not stable to give same results everytime on different windows platforms with different memory hardware configurations. I must say that the “product sanity sw testing” is not the underdog of sw industry as well as DCS platform. As we see like the latest Microsoft release failures, if you don’t make real “tests” and use the ai to test individual code parts and use community as a test group, this becomes an unfair trade. You can not say “This is Beta” when you launch, trade and release all new features and modules on “beta”. Or change the release procedure and release all major updates on stable. I dont get paid for making tests and correcting the game install and spend my time spared from my family time after a hard working day. I must admit that I love this platform and I like spending time on it but this is the truth. This is a great platform and we love it, thank you ED for it. This is not an easy job, I know it well but I think it needs some attention from the integration testing point of view. Thank u for your time if you’ve read this till the end.
  14. New statement. When radar is off, fps drops does not occur.
  15. Hi guys, Here is the video, only Mig-21 module is having fps drops by now. System specs are in video. Best Regards.
  16. With the latest update, tool can not find the dcs build info...
  17. We all know these rules, mouse scroll does not work.
  18. Last night, literally I've fought with it at nav mission and at last I've gave up. It just doesnt lower the frequency. Big problem.
  19. PLEASE RAZBAM SOLVE Mouse SCROLL Problem for Mig-19 Nav tuning. It is exhausting and terrible problem. Why didnt you solve it for a long time? You may think it is not important but it really pisses of everyone who wants to use Mig-19.
  20. Any Mig-23 updates? A short, tiny test video would be great if it can fly ;)
×
×
  • Create New...