Jump to content

Skyhammer

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    82

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Skyhammer

  1. Skyhammer
    i have seen the news about the Su-25 get an (long needed) graphic update ...My question would the Su-27/ Su33 also get the a visual update because they are also dated...
  2. Skyhammer
    then its pretty much uselees to bring "newer" REDFOR...even now they are nothing more than "Target drones" for Spamraam Trucks/ Blue
  3. Skyhammer
    atm we HAS nothing of that, and that only 1950- to very early 80s stuff at best....
  4. Skyhammer
    No still not fixed...Fc3 aircraft have always a low priority
  5. Skyhammer
    REDFOR is officially dead with the Typhoon on the horizon and F-35..damn even Bluefue even getting an FF F- 15C :(( 80s Flanker vs 2010+ Aircraft Really?! Thanks ED!!!!!
  6. Skyhammer
    still up
  7. Skyhammer
    I found a bug that this new Gyrocoptern is indestructible by IR SAMS ..the Missile went through it and nothing happens. gyrocopter indestructible to Stinger.trk gyrocopter indestructible to Igla.trk gyrocopter indestructible to short range IR SAM.trk
  8. Skyhammer
    What is not properly working at the MPU? working fine at my track Isn´t the MPU the version with the greatest range? KH-25MPU.trk Tacview-20240923-132939-DCS.zip.acmi
  9. Skyhammer
    you are using the "Fantasmagoria" ELINT pod on the Su-25T? when you lock the SAM radar they can switch there radar off so that your KH25MPU has no source anymore an can therefore miss the target
  10. Skyhammer
    would be still better than what we current have ....
  11. Skyhammer
    I agree... sadly it seems any FC is pretty much dead by now ..redfor players waiting for years now for any visually / other improvements ....
  12. Skyhammer
    ok fine ..but why a Su25T (1984) in DCS has element of a Su27SM HUD then in it ?! so i would argue that symbology was already implanted before the SM and was already available in the S versions (1985)
  13. Skyhammer
    if F-16 can have unrealistic 4 HARM loadout, Redfor can have for sure an SM HUD i think
  14. Skyhammer
    Its from a Su-27SM but i found literally not 1 RL picture of an Su-27S HUD with its symbology ...anyway would be nice to have it because it gives more information to the the pilot
  15. Skyhammer
    thank you both it finally worked
  16. Skyhammer
    Pinging digitalcombatsimulator.com [93.115.211.146] with 32 bytes of data: Request timed out. Request timed out. Request timed out. Request timed out. Ping statistics for 93,115,211,146: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 0, Lost = 4 (100% loss),
  17. Skyhammer
    when i try to start the game it shows me that Login failure, then it shows me that all modules are disabled, then the game start in offline mode Its already exluded and marked as a trustworthy program..repair doesn´t work it always it shows "Timeout has been reached"
  18. Skyhammer
    My Problem is that my DCS starting only in offline Mode even if my PC have an internet connection. Nearly all Moduls are offline. I hope anybody can help..even repairing the came does not work autoupdate_templog.txt
  19. Skyhammer
    thanks for your reply but why DCS encyclopedia say that the PS-system can also use 48N6E missiles!?..the 5v55 seems is only the Standard missile for the PS
  20. Skyhammer
    so i tested the F-18 and the JF-17 and they also get spikes on there RWRs it just seems the target acquisition from the SA-13 is just wrong modeled SA-13 spike F-18 .trk SA-13 spike JF-17 .trk
  21. Skyhammer
    ?
  22. Skyhammer
    what i found on the Internet its definitely described as designed against Air targets "R-27P - with passive radar CNS 9B-1102 (see photo). It is intended to engage DRLO and other radio-emitting airplanes at any time of the day, in simple and difficult weather conditions, in the front hemisphere, including the background of various underlying surfaces, providing defeat of aircraft that put the active interference radar to cover their aircraft. Explosive device - a radio detonator and contact target sensor. Battle unit - rod bearing type. "
  23. Skyhammer
    wow that was a nice favor ...20 years ago..what was done since then? .... to be fair the R-77 in its current state is politely said garbage and can barely fly 50 km if shot from 30k ft, above 1.0 Mach or they need to add PL-12 to Su-33/J-11...that the gameplay is somewhat on one level in terms of Fox3´s because otherwise they would need to limit bluefor to Fox 1
  24. Skyhammer
    I found a strange behavior from the Strela-10. When the SAM "locking" me with there IR seekers it triggers my RWR what not should happing from an IR targeting System. The "radar" from the SA-13 should also not trigger an RWR spike because it is actually only for passiv range finding not to lock a target, Target acquisition only takes place visually. IR Strela 10 triggers RWR Su25.trk IR Strela 10 triggers RWR F15.trk
  25. Skyhammer
    Redfor would be even more outclassed than it already is with more SPAMRAAM variants.....
×
×
  • Create New...