Jump to content

Skyhammer

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    82

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Skyhammer

  1. Skyhammer
    Tacview-20231012-044951-DCS.txt.acmi
  2. Skyhammer
    I don´t know it seems odd that that the SAMs just fly close right by the MLRS rocket but didn't explode...they should have proximity fuses
  3. Skyhammer
    i reported the same but thre was no reaction to that ..and btw the 300mm at 45.000 ft are faster with ~1.9 Mach than the Uragan 220mm at the same altitude with 1.5Mach
  4. Skyhammer
    I like the Flanker and its the only possiblity to fly it in DCS via FC3
  5. Skyhammer
    as AI a J-11B shure whould be nice
  6. Skyhammer
    we don't even have a proper J-11A where it should have 4 MFDs...and only have the intial Su27SK copy labeled as J-11A with Fox 3s so bad that people prefer to use the ERs instead of the 77
  7. Skyhammer
    yeah, i agree on that. On the GS server you can see very good what only better missiles could do. The j-11 with 4 PL-12 finally have some teeth to fight against Bluefor..and they get pushed to there base every time XD
  8. Skyhammer
    up!
  9. Skyhammer
    Hello, i don´t know if its a Bug or something but SAM sites like SA-10/ Patriot are unable to shoot down incoming MLRS rockets despite they can detect them and they try to engage them? Patriot SAM unable to shoot down MLRS rockets.trk
  10. Skyhammer
    It would be great to have PL-12 on the J-11A
  11. Skyhammer
    then i wonder how they managed to do a FC3 Su33 that is literally from 1993/94
  12. Skyhammer
    the possibility for a "modern" Redfor jet is (sadly) pretty much zero..they will be existing only as mods
  13. Skyhammer
    Yes ok, I learned something there, they correct it now. and i hope that they add the wing/airframe edge vapors that are completly missing on all Flankers
  14. Skyhammer
    Ok thanks, will the airframe/wing vapors (like in the IRL picture) also corrected on the Su27/33 or only the overwing vapors?
  15. Skyhammer
    Su33 no Vapor effect .trk Su27 no Vapor effect .trk
  16. Skyhammer
    The wing vapor effect is completely absent on the Su-27/33...you can pull as many high G´s as you you wish there s no effect on the aircraft. Also the vapor effect on Flankers are wrong that they have no vapors on the wing/airframe edge like on the pictures. Only on the J-11A module are visible vapor effects but none also at the wing/airframe edge.
  17. Skyhammer
    in the DCS encyclopedia there are only other number for the 5N66M: Radar Target Detection Range:: (Maximum range (target at 500 m) 90 km (Maximum range (target at 1000 m) 120 km..but in-game its shows only something about 60km
  18. Skyhammer
    Why are the SA-10 search radars so underperforming compared to the Patriot search radar? According to the DCS encyclopedia, the SA-10 5N66M has a maximum detection range of 120/90 km... but in-game it's more like 60 km and the 64H6E Big Bird has a detection range of 300 km in the encyclopedia, again only 170 km like in-game Patriot AN/MPQ-53
  19. Skyhammer
    I noticed that the SU-27/J11's canopy does not fly away from the aircraft when ejected on the ground and when open. This problem seems to affect only the flankers because I've also tested it on the Mig 29A/S/G and the canopy snaps off when you stand on the ground and opened Im using version 2.8.3.38090 MT
  20. Skyhammer
    Yes iam using DCS Open Beta MT ..but still massive Problems....
  21. Skyhammer
    I dont´t know how to describe it proper but the screen on the J-11 jumping all over the place and
×
×
  • Create New...