MiG-21Bis Poll

[nagard]

$150 for MiG-21! MiG-21 is an aircraft for real men. :-)

 

100€ for MiG21bis, Orao J21, Galeb G4 and Serbian terrain (Balkan map)

[4c Hajduk Veljko]

100€ for MiG21bis, Orao J21, Galeb G4 and Serbian terrain (Balkan map)

Second that!

[Witchking]

ED ! Please implement teh mig 21. Atleast as an AI for now. :(

[graywo1fg]

The more realistic aircraft to fly the marrier 35 bucks for me i'm luvin the Mig-21 that is a historic aircraft would be a great joy to fly it :thumbup::smartass::pilotfly:

[paladrian]

OMG Deja Vu!! :wacko:

[thesystem]

€50 for sure when the mig 21 will be in it!!! i dream comes out!!!:pilotfly:

[VMFA117_Poko]

100$ for Fishbed! It's probably easy to simulate - rough, reliable but simple!

[nscode]

Easy? Simple? 21? No way..

[Stealth_HR]

MiG-21 was the best fighter aircraft of the third generation. Although it was the best at the time, we at this point don't need it in lock On game. that is the reason I did not vote.

I beg to differ. By and large, the MiG-21 was one of the most mass-produced airplances post-WW2, and quite a few of the in-game listed nations have operated and still operate them - especially if you consider the fictional Lock-On theater is circa 1980, where they were still reserve fighters if nothing else.

 

Iteresting to fly with MIG-21, but try something more interesting. I am not sure that it will be accepted by many users. What about Jak38 maybe Jak 141 :) (141, i know it was not serial aircraft :) )

I agree, having a Yak-38 or Yak-(1)41 would be excellent, especially the latter since it was a tech demonstrator with breakthroughs in quite a few fields, including post-Mach flight.

The problem is, for one, they'd have to make a decent cross between the Ka-50 and Su-25T flightmodels as the 141 is a VSTOL jet.

For two, and a much bigger problem, is the fact the 141 never made it top operational status - the ex-CCCP industry crashed, and the 141 was unfortunately mothballed. As for the 38, the problem is that there were too few produced, and the vertical landing procedure was something fierce - you absolutely had to autoland. :joystick:

 

IMHO A Mig-21 with out a Phantom is just pathetic...the two must be packaged together

I wouldn't call it pathetic, though one of them as a flyable would really need the other one. Kind of like the MiG-29 would really need an F-16, except it wasn't created because of constraints best known and left to ED. And, possibly, to keep the balance, Mirage-2000, except if you count the MiG-29G.

 

To recap on the VTOLs, the same thing would apply for the following combo - AV-8B Harrier II, BAe Harrier GR7/9 and Yak-38/41.

 

Frankly, I'd be very happy to see a MiG-21, be it flyable or not. If it's a non-flyable, it'd be all fine and well, because it means not having to worry about the F-4's player flight-model as well. The variant doesn't matter - I'd be equally happy seeing a MiG-21F-13, MiG-21bis, MiG-21-93 or MiG-21-2000 model. If it were flyable, the most realistic one would be the bis.

[VMFA117_Poko]

Easy? Simple? 21? No way..

 

Why is that? 21 doesn't have too complicated to simulate avionics. Rough I meant FM.

[nscode]

Yes, if you want to do it in a simplified way. If you want to do it at BS level, theres alot things to make and alot things to learn how to operate. And even just flying it isn't simple... need to keep that speed above 600 km/h or u're toast. So, there's some automation to help you with landing (>300 km/h, >70% N1 or you're dead) and that needs to be modeled too.

[3Sqn_Sven]

another poll, wtf is happening, is lo forums turning in lo polls ? :p

 

 

STEWIE FOR GOVERNER!