Mad Dog 7.62 Posted December 2, 2015 Posted December 2, 2015 I am having issues in 2.0 with both frame rate and graphics. The graphics I am getting even on high settings are NOT what people are posting in their vids, I am getting a lot of missing buildings, "popping", and choppy performance. I have tried lower graphic settings and I just get missing buildings and muddy looking terrain, at the higher settings I get less missing buildings but a lot of "popping" buildings and slow choppy fps. I did not have these problems before but I know Nevada is more demanding. Thinking my old ATI 5770 card is going to need replaced. Its a 2MB card and I am guessing it just can't handle Nevada! Or just I do a whole new system? Recommendations? If I do just the GPU, Probably going to go to a GTX970. Best bang for the buck? [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Gigabyte GA97XSLI Core i7 4790 @ 4.0 Ghz MSI GTX 1080ti 32 Mb RAM DDR3-2133 512GB SSD for DCS HP Reverb VR HMD Thrustmaster Warthog & MFG Crosswind
boedha68 Posted December 2, 2015 Posted December 2, 2015 Beginning at least GTX 970. But if you have the bucks a new system. Newest system: AMD 9800X3d, Kingsting 128 GBDDR5, MSI RTX 5090(ready for buying), Corsair 150 Pro, 3xSamsung 970 Pro, Logitech X-56 HOTAS, Pimax Crystal Light (Super is purchased) ASUS 1200 Watt. New system:I9-9900KS, Kingston 128 GB DDR4 3200Mhz, MSI RTX 4090, Corsair H150 Pro RGB, 2xSamsung 970 EVO 2Tb, 2xsamsung 970 EVO 1 TB, Scandisk m2 500 MB, 2 x Crucial 1 Tb, T16000M HOTAS, HP Reverb Professional 2, Corsair 750 Watt. Old system:I7-4770K(OC 4.5Ghz), Kingston 24 GB DDR3 1600 Mhz,MSI RTX 2080(OC 2070 Mhz), 2 * 500 GB SSD, 3,5 TB HDD, 55' Samsung 3d tv, Trackir 5, Logitech HD Cam, T16000M HOTAS. All DCS modules, maps and campaigns:pilotfly:
Mad Dog 7.62 Posted December 2, 2015 Author Posted December 2, 2015 Well according to Windows my card is only DX10. It was supposed to be a DX11 when I bought it...... [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Gigabyte GA97XSLI Core i7 4790 @ 4.0 Ghz MSI GTX 1080ti 32 Mb RAM DDR3-2133 512GB SSD for DCS HP Reverb VR HMD Thrustmaster Warthog & MFG Crosswind
Mad Dog 7.62 Posted December 2, 2015 Author Posted December 2, 2015 And it only has 1 GB of RAM, not two. Yep, time for an upgrade....damn!!! [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Gigabyte GA97XSLI Core i7 4790 @ 4.0 Ghz MSI GTX 1080ti 32 Mb RAM DDR3-2133 512GB SSD for DCS HP Reverb VR HMD Thrustmaster Warthog & MFG Crosswind
AtaliaA1 Posted December 3, 2015 Posted December 3, 2015 I have the i7 920 as you can see in my Sig. I have not problems with the Sim. All settings on High. Same Motherboard and Ram. Just have the 760 and wouldn't change a thing right now anyway, you know how that goes, never can "Future Proof" a PC. to many hardware enhancements. This was a Boutique Builder iBuypower rig. Until I got the tinker bug again i7 920 @3.6Mhz 12Gig Corsair XMS3 ram 1600 Nvidia 760 SLi w/4Gig DDR5 Ram Intel 310 SSD HDD 160 Gb + Western Digital 4Terabyte HDD Creative SB X-Fi HD Audio Logitech X-530 5.1 Surround Speaker System Dual Acer 32"Monitors. PSU 1200 w Thermaltake Win10 64Bit.
Brisse Posted December 3, 2015 Posted December 3, 2015 Well according to Windows my card is only DX10. It was supposed to be a DX11 when I bought it...... Windows got it wrong, which can happen especially if you don't have the correct driver installed. The card does indeed support DX11, but it is getting old. I wouldn't want to be stuck with one of those for DCS 2.0.
algerad3 Posted December 3, 2015 Posted December 3, 2015 I have two 5770's x fired ( took them out). When 1.5 rolled out I was in the same boat. With xfire I did see some gains (about 10-15). I have 16gb mem, I7-930 proc. I decided to upgrade and got two r9-270 (best buy model) and saw mass improvements. In 1.5 flying the ka-50 in the "Clear Tchavili" mission I was seeing 35-40 fps at mission start and pretty much hovered in that range throughout. (x-fire) I am now seeing 100+ fps in dcs 2.0. (settings high with medium traffic). With the new drivers ( which offer no improvement for the 5770 iirc) my frames have improved even more. So, in short newer vid card will/should do wonders for you. Hope this helps. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] CPIAS FOR Saitek: Saitek Flight instrument panels and X-52 pro mfd scripts for Dcs http://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=94174
wilky510 Posted December 3, 2015 Posted December 3, 2015 If I do just the GPU, Probably going to go to a GTX970. Best bang for the buck? Like i said in the other thread. Get the 970 FTW, it's 10-20 dollars more and will preform with a normal 980 in terms of FPS. What resolution are you playing at?
ShuRugal Posted December 3, 2015 Posted December 3, 2015 (edited) Best bang for the buck? http://www.videocardbenchmark.net/gpu_value.html compare with http://www.videocardbenchmark.net/high_end_gpus.html and we see that a GTX 950 is currently the most cost-effective (highest benchmark points per dollar) of all 900-series video cards. By comparison, the GTX 970 costs over twice as much, but only brings a 60% increase in bench score. As far as DCS performance goes, the 950 scores 25% better than the 780M in my laptop, and I run DCS 1.5 at near max settings and see 45-60 FPS, depending on aircraft, altitude, and location. Edited December 3, 2015 by ShuRugal
will487 Posted December 6, 2015 Posted December 6, 2015 Like i said in the other thread. Get the 970 FTW, it's 10-20 dollars more and will preform with a normal 980 in terms of FPS. What resolution are you playing at? Would you mind expanding on this? What 970 are you comparing the 970 FTW to? Would the superclocked EVGA 970 be even better than this? [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
Recommended Posts