wsoul2k Posted July 9, 2006 Posted July 9, 2006 Microsoft Flight Simulator X I dont know if you guys have seen this before.....but the city the water everthing is so good...... wewill have some mission this time not only fly around Juts take a look Here: Rodrigo Monteiro LOCKON 1.12 AMD 3.8 X2 64 2G DDR ATI X1800XT 512 SAITEK X-36 AND VERY SOON TRACKIR-4
Pilotasso Posted July 9, 2006 Posted July 9, 2006 Too bad the perfomance will suck donkey balls and too bad it will be a sterile world, as all MS SIM have always been. The graphics are just marketing for sales. .
ED Team Glowing_Amraam Posted July 9, 2006 ED Team Posted July 9, 2006 Ive seen videos of moving traffic, so i dont think the world will be THAT sterile... I've also seen animals walking around lol https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCgJRhtnqA-67pKmQ3A2GsgA ED youtube channel https://www.facebook.com/glowingamraam My facebook page
Cosmonaut Posted July 9, 2006 Posted July 9, 2006 M$FS has always been a little sterile as stock but once you get the correct mods installed with real world airlines, dual runways in use etc then it really comes alive. Cozmo. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Minimum effort, maximum satisfaction. CDDS Tutorial Version 3. | Main Screen Mods.
Kula66 Posted July 9, 2006 Posted July 9, 2006 Too bad the perfomance will suck donkey balls . But significantly better than LO ... because it doesn't have to model all the radar/IR etc and the low level stuff that makes LO visually sooooo good! Although looking at those pictures, perhaps MS have over-taken LO :o
thesystem Posted July 9, 2006 Posted July 9, 2006 MS is nice and fun but, when you buy or download mil planes they just dont feel like mil planes because all the systems work like dogshit...nothing works and when you want FS to the max (realism) you will need to buy allot of addons!! DCS World, A10C, AV8B, M2k, FA18C, FC3, MIG21
Shaman Posted July 9, 2006 Posted July 9, 2006 :thumbdown: Unbeliavable FSX with "unbelievable" flight model. 51PVO Founding member (DEC2007-) 100KIAP Founding member (DEC2018-) :: Shaman aka [100☭] Shamansky tail# 44 or 444 [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] 100KIAP Regiment Early Warning & Control officer
Crusty Posted July 9, 2006 Posted July 9, 2006 Too bad the perfomance will suck donkey balls and too bad it will be a sterile world, as all MS SIM have always been. The graphics are just marketing for sales. what do you mean by "the graphics are just marketing for sales" ? oo err...missus:animals_bunny: ** Anti-Pastie**
Silent Warrior Posted July 10, 2006 Posted July 10, 2006 Crusty: You know of Final Fantasy? Yeah. :P I don't suppose there's a demo in sight here, is there?
dodger42 Posted July 10, 2006 Posted July 10, 2006 Man that looks sweet. One thing MS have done well is allowing 3rd party development. I'd pay money for deep addons to lomac also, but that will never happen. Think of some of the weather mods for MSFS. The details some have made for flyables. If you have never tried FS2004 with a PMDG aircraft like the 747 or 737NG, then you really ought to. They boast a 100% systems modelling of cold and dark starts and departures. Would be cool is M$ offered their terrain engine for license and at a reasonable price. . . . Lockon Advanced Realism with Touch-Buddy
SuperKungFu Posted July 10, 2006 Posted July 10, 2006 OT- does anyone know where is the most active MS2004 forum? Similar to this site being the best lock on site, where do most of the FS9 boys hang out? [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
Cosmonaut Posted July 10, 2006 Posted July 10, 2006 OT- does anyone know where is the most active MS2004 forum? Similar to this site being the best lock on site, where do most of the FS9 boys hang out? I’d say flightsim.com and Avsim; http://www.flightsim.com/cgi/kds/main/menuchoo.htm http://www.avsim.com/ Cozmo. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Minimum effort, maximum satisfaction. CDDS Tutorial Version 3. | Main Screen Mods.
VMFA117_Poko Posted July 10, 2006 Posted July 10, 2006 I can stand sterile graphic but the flight model not. There will be no changes with this subject. Pitty...:(
wsoul2k Posted July 10, 2006 Author Posted July 10, 2006 the world will not be sterille, i just read the roads will be alive ...and at nigth you will see the lights from cars and all the other stufs And thay have stated you can use the roads to do a and IFR ( I folow roads :P :P )land lol the low level flight IMO actualy is bether then Lock On jus tlook the pics and the most important it it will be upgradable to DX10 and this upgrade will be free About the low FPS in this interview they dont hide this from no one.....they have told you will need a ultimate machine to run it at max settings. Rodrigo Monteiro LOCKON 1.12 AMD 3.8 X2 64 2G DDR ATI X1800XT 512 SAITEK X-36 AND VERY SOON TRACKIR-4
ALDEGA Posted July 10, 2006 Posted July 10, 2006 the world will not be sterille, i just read the roads will be alive ...and at nigth you will see the lights from cars and all the other stufs Lockon had civilian traffic (cars and trains) in 2003... (you can even tweak the density to fill the roads and railtracks) Looks like another graphics update, but relatively limited gameplay improvement. The helo's will probably still feel like flying saucers. Not that the airplane FM's were great anyway ;) I bet airports like JFK will still be ... virtually empty (even with "100%" traffic) ... as in the previous editions, nothing like reality.
ED Team Glowing_Amraam Posted July 10, 2006 ED Team Posted July 10, 2006 (you can even tweak the density to fill the roads and railtracks) Since when? :huh: and how? https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCgJRhtnqA-67pKmQ3A2GsgA ED youtube channel https://www.facebook.com/glowingamraam My facebook page
thesystem Posted July 10, 2006 Posted July 10, 2006 Lockon had civilian traffic (cars and trains) in 2003... (you can even tweak the density to fill the roads and railtracks) Looks like another graphics update, but relatively limited gameplay improvement. The helo's will probably still feel like flying saucers. Not that the airplane FM's were great anyway ;) I bet airports like JFK will still be ... virtually empty (even with "100%" traffic) ... as in the previous editions, nothing like reality. There are realy good addons for increasing traffic! DCS World, A10C, AV8B, M2k, FA18C, FC3, MIG21
wsoul2k Posted July 10, 2006 Author Posted July 10, 2006 And they have the best clouds i have seen Rodrigo Monteiro LOCKON 1.12 AMD 3.8 X2 64 2G DDR ATI X1800XT 512 SAITEK X-36 AND VERY SOON TRACKIR-4
Cosmonaut Posted July 10, 2006 Posted July 10, 2006 Lockon had civilian traffic (cars and trains) in 2003... (you can even tweak the density to fill the roads and railtracks) Looks like another graphics update, but relatively limited gameplay improvement. The helo's will probably still feel like flying saucers. Not that the airplane FM's were great anyway ;) I bet airports like JFK will still be ... virtually empty (even with "100%" traffic) ... as in the previous editions, nothing like reality. Never fly the default aircraft in M$FS they’re crap!! You’ve got to install third party aircraft .. they’re ten times more detailed and the FM’s are great too.. even helicopters. Most of the major airports should be streaming with aircraft landing and departing .. well it will be after you pay a visit to this site: http://www.projectai.com/packages/ and then start using the installer to load most of the major airlines (it also upgrades parking areas) . The airlines that are installed run on close to real world flight schedules so be careful when choosing a departure time or you’ll be waiting a long time just to get clearance. Basically stay away from Heathrow (EGLL) between 6am and 11am… my pc cant even handle the traffic at those times… Cozmo. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Minimum effort, maximum satisfaction. CDDS Tutorial Version 3. | Main Screen Mods.
thesystem Posted July 10, 2006 Posted July 10, 2006 But for the most realism...the engine isnt the best for that. When you fly a fighter.....you can easely pull max 12G or somewhat and the flight cumputer will do nothing against that...or like AOA isnt modeled DCS World, A10C, AV8B, M2k, FA18C, FC3, MIG21
ALDEGA Posted July 10, 2006 Posted July 10, 2006 Since when? :huh: and how? Since version 1.0. I once created a large amount of cars and really long trains ;D It does decrease performance iirc. I'll look it up. Update: \Lock On\Bazar\Routes\RouteTypes.sht Road vehicle parameters are at the top of the file. (reduction of "period" reduces space between two vehicles iirc, and thus increases density). You can change minimal and maximal length of a train, speed and type at the bottom of the file. I played with the settings in LO1.0; had some crazy screenshots of it. ;D
ALDEGA Posted July 10, 2006 Posted July 10, 2006 Never fly the default aircraft in M$FS they’re crap!! You’ve got to install third party aircraft .. they’re ten times more detailed and the FM’s are great too.. even helicopters. Most of the major airports should be streaming with aircraft landing and departing .. well it will be after you pay a visit to this site: http://www.projectai.com/packages/ and then start using the installer to load most of the major airlines (it also upgrades parking areas) . The airlines that are installed run on close to real world flight schedules so be careful when choosing a departure time or you’ll be waiting a long time just to get clearance. Basically stay away from Heathrow (EGLL) between 6am and 11am… my pc cant even handle the traffic at those times… I know about all these things. Too much trouble and still not what it should be, sorry. I've given up on MSFS. As long as they keep working with the same people and the same recycled vision ... They have/had a video of the MSFS team on Channel9.msdn at some point. After watching that video, I understood why they keep delivering such a product. Never fly the default aircraft in M$FS they’re crap!! You’ve got to install third party aircraft .. they’re ten times more detailed and the FM’s are great too.. even helicopters.Nowhere near AFM quality. Sorry.
Cosmonaut Posted July 10, 2006 Posted July 10, 2006 But for the most realism...the engine isnt the best for that. When you fly a fighter.....you can easely pull max 12G or somewhat and the flight cumputer will do nothing against that...or like AOA isnt modeled Well you should G-lock before 12 g’s and if you have aircraft damage on then you’ll damage your aircraft as well and force a restart or pause … Although flying fighters can be extremely realistic in FS9 I would have to agree with you that a flight simmer should look elsewhere for a chance to fly extreme maneuvers in modern fighters… Personally, after the release of lomac I don’t even bother installing fighters anymore in M$FS. Cozmo. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Minimum effort, maximum satisfaction. CDDS Tutorial Version 3. | Main Screen Mods.
Cosmonaut Posted July 10, 2006 Posted July 10, 2006 Nowhere near AFM quality. Sorry. Agreed. Cozmo. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Minimum effort, maximum satisfaction. CDDS Tutorial Version 3. | Main Screen Mods.
Recommended Posts